Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Dan Yargici
Actually it looks like it wasn't one of the projects accepted by google. Or no one picked it up... https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/GoogleSummerOfCode/2016 Sent from my phone... On 26 Jul 2016 10:50 p.m., "Dan Yargici" wrote: > It's a summer of code project so

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Dan Yargici
It's a summer of code project so it's fairly likely. https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/GoogleSummerOfCode/2016/Ideas Sent from my phone... On 26 Jul 2016 10:49 p.m., "Dan Yargici" wrote: > It is quite usable but it currently has no lens distortion workflow >

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Dan Yargici
It is quite usable but it currently has no lens distortion workflow afaik. I think it may be coming in 2.78 however. Sent from my phone... On 26 Jul 2016 9:30 p.m., "Adam Seeley" wrote: > Innnteresting. > > On 26 July 2016 at 08:14, Gerbrand Nel

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Adam Seeley
Innnteresting. On 26 July 2016 at 08:14, Gerbrand Nel wrote: > Don't underestimate Blender. > I’ve used it on a few jobs alongside pftrack, and the results on some > of the shots were better in blender. > Plus it will cost you nothing but your free time to check it out.

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Chris Marshall
OK Thanks! On 26 July 2016 at 08:14, Gerbrand Nel wrote: > Don't underestimate Blender. > I’ve used it on a few jobs alongside pftrack, and the results on some > of the shots were better in blender. > Plus it will cost you nothing but your free time to check it out. > G >

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-26 Thread Gerbrand Nel
Don't underestimate Blender. I’ve used it on a few jobs alongside pftrack, and the results on some of the shots were better in blender. Plus it will cost you nothing but your free time to check it out. G -- Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Marshall
gt;>>>>> >>>>>> If you need to choose just one, I would pick PFTrack. The node based >>>>>> workflow is awesome, but the rest of the UI is awful. A good combination >>>>>> is >>>>>> to 2D track in Syntheyes and

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-21 Thread Jordi Bares
r simple shots if you already have a license. >>> >>> If you need to choose just one, I would pick PFTrack. The node based >>> workflow is awesome, but the rest of the UI is awful. A good combination is >>> to 2D track in Syntheyes and 3D solve in PFTrack. >

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Francois Lord
gt; >>>>>>> Rob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /-// >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19-7-2016 16:18, Cristobal Infante wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I woul

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Dan Yargici
good combination >>>>> is >>>>> to 2D track in Syntheyes and 3D solve in PFTrack. >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-07-19 10:46, Rob Wuijster wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There's PFTrack, and SynthEyes is used a lot as well. Synt

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Chris Marshall
e rest of the UI is awful. A good combination >>>>> is >>>>> to 2D track in Syntheyes and 3D solve in PFTrack. >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-07-19 10:46, Rob Wuijster wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There's PFTrack, and SynthE

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Andy Nicholas
On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com <mailto:chrismarshal...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All, What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these day

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Alok Gandhi
> decent pricing too. >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> \/-\/----\/ >>>> >>>> On 19-7-2016 16:18, Cristobal Infante wrote: >>>> >>>> I would recommend 3DEqualizer, it's prob

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Chris Marshall
is used a lot as well. SynthEyes has >>> decent pricing too. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> \/-\/\/ >>> >>> On 19-7-2016 16:18, Cristobal Infante wrote: >>> >>> I would recommend 3DEqualizer, it's

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-20 Thread Olivier Jeannel
t. >> FXPHD have some good intro courses I believe. >> >> On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I >>> haven't

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Adam Sale
good intro courses I believe. > > On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I >> haven't needed to do it for a while. >&

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Francois Lord
s Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com [2]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I haven't needed to do it for a while. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> -- &

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Rob Wuijster
courses I believe. On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com <mailto:chrismarshal...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All, What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I haven't needed to do it for a while. Cheer

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Cristobal Infante
I would recommend 3DEqualizer, it's probably the best one out there. You can now rent it. FXPHD have some good intro courses I believe. On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > What are people using for motion tracking / match movin

Re: Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Chris Marshall
I was wondering if Boujou is still used generally or are there any good inbuilt trackers worth looking at? Or any alternatives out there that can be recommended? Thanks On 19 July 2016 at 10:47, Chris Marshall <chrismarshal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > What are people usin

Motion Tracking

2016-07-19 Thread Chris Marshall
Hi All, What are people using for motion tracking / match moving these days? I haven't needed to do it for a while. Cheers Chris -- Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.