;
softimage@listproc.autodesk.com mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: emTopolizer or emPolygonizer?
Polygonizer is easier/faster to set up has more features for doing
meshing. Topololizer's meshing tools are really there to supplement and
support all the features of Topolizer. To mesh
/
From: pete...@skynet.be
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: emTopolizer or emPolygonizer?
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:54:47 +0200
If you just want to polygonize pointclouds and be done with it – get
Polygonizer I guess.
But If you’re at all excited by the prospect
A question to Mootzoiding colleagues:
I am considering getting emPolygonizer4 or emTopolizer for current
polygonizing needs. I have checked Eric's video demos and read up on
features but I am still not quite sure which one is the better choice for
my needs.
It looks like emTopolizer is newer and
a hunch)
Paul Griswold
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:51 PM
To: Morten Bartholdy ; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: emTopolizer or emPolygonizer?
Polygonizer is easier/faster to set up has more features for doing meshing.
Topololizer's meshing tools are really
4 matches
Mail list logo