Re: Deleting on exact match

On 6/21/2020 1:04 PM, Scott Q. wrote: The task at hand is to remove all documents indexed the old way, but how can I do that ? user is of the form u...@domain.com and if I search for u...@domain.com it matches all of 'user' or 'domain.com' which has obvious unwanted consequences. Therefore, how

Re: Deleting on exact match

I would add a new field with the new behavior. Then any document with content in the new field would not need to be deleted. Find the deletable content with: *:* -new_field:* I generally add a field that records when the document was indexed or updated. That can be really handy. wunder

Re: Deleting on exact match

Also note that I didn't apply the new schema yet because I don't think it will let me change it mid-way like this without deleting all data and starting anew... On Sunday, 21/06/2020 at 15:12 Scott Q. wrote: My apologies, it appears the configuration tags were escaped and completely removed

Re: Deleting on exact match

My apologies, it appears the configuration tags were escaped and completely removed from my original e-mail. I am including them via pastebin.com https://pastebin.com/BSUqgEke On Sunday, 21/06/2020 at 15:04 Scott Q. wrote: Hello, I use Solr with Dovecot and I made a mistake when I

Deleting on exact match

Hello, I use Solr with Dovecot and I made a mistake when I initially created my schema for my instance. I created the username field with partial matches enabled. Aka, like this:                                                                                                          

Re: Scoring partial match in title field higher than exact match in description field

wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Mar 31, 2020, at 6:00 AM, nileshwagh24 wrote: > > In need to score partial match in NAME field higher than exact match in > INFOTEXT field.Actually I need to sort my SOLR result based on following > five co

Scoring partial match in title field higher than exact match in description field

In need to score partial match in NAME field higher than exact match in INFOTEXT field.Actually I need to sort my SOLR result based on following five conditions 1.First, results with a whole word match on the first or second word in the NAME go on top. 2.Then, results with a whole word match

Re: Exact match

Hi, Here's our example of exact match fields: https://github.com/NatLibFi/finna-solr/blob/master/vufind/biblio/conf/schema.xml#L48 textProper_l requires a partial match from the beginning. textProper_lr requires a full match. I'm not sure if this works for you, but at least we have

Re: Exact match

Hi Omer, If you mean exact match with same number of words (Emir's), you can also add an identifier in the beginning and end of the some other field like title_exact. This can be done in your indexing script or using Pattern Replace. During query side, you can use this identifier. For example

Re: Exact match

There are two different interpretations of “exact match” going on here, don’t be confused! Emir’s version is “the text has to match the _entire_ input. So a field with “a b c d” will NOT match “a b” or “a b c” or “b c", but only “a b c d”. David’s version is “The text has to contain

Re: Exact match

Hi Omer, From performance perspective, it is the best if you index title as a single token: KeywordTokenizer + LowerCaseFilter If you need to query that field in some other way, you can index it differently as some other field using copyField. HTH, Emir -- Monitoring - Log Management -

Re: Exact match

if the query is in quotes it will work. also, not sure if youve been following, but get rid of: StopFilterFactory and all stopwords, or just make your stop word file empty if you need it to work in non quotes, add them to the query post submission ? On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:44 PM OTH wrote: >

Exact match

Hello, What would be the best way to get exact matches (if any) to a query? E.g.: Let's the document text is: "united states of america". Currently, any query containing one or more of the three words "united", "states", or "america" will match with the above document. I would like a way so

Re: attempting to get an exact match on a textField

; I am trying to use the API to get an exact match on clt_ref_no. > > At one point, I was using ""s to enclose the text such as: > > clt_ref_no: "OWL-2924-8", and I was getting 5 results. Which is accurate. > > Now when I use it, I only get one match. > >

attempting to get an exact match on a textField

I am trying to use the API to get an exact match on clt_ref_no. At one point, I was using ""s to enclose the text such as: clt_ref_no: "OWL-2924-8", and I was getting 5 results. Which is accurate. Now when I use it, I only get one match. If I try to build the url in perl, a

Re: exact Match and Contains

rad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Small Correction in the mail above: attachmentType is managed-schema is: > indexed="true" stored="true"/> > > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Rushikesh Garadade > Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:43 PM > Sub

Fwd: exact Match and Contains

Small Correction in the mail above: attachmentType is managed-schema is: -- Forwarded message - From: Rushikesh Garadade Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:43 PM Subject: exact Match and Contains To: Hi, I have field attachmentType in my collection whose schema is as follows

exact Match and Contains

Hi, I have field attachmentType in my collection whose schema is as follows: when I search for attachmentType:application/pdf i.e. /select *?q=attachmentType:application/pdf * I get results [image: image.png] When I search for attachmentType:*application/pdf* i.e. /select?

Re: Grouping on Exact Match

Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:31 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match > > Hi Gopesh, > No it is not - at least not in a way I was thinking. I should have been more > precise - I meant tokenized. So you are grouping on the field that

RE: Grouping on Exact Match

...@sematext.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:31 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match Hi Gopesh, No it is not - at least not in a way I was thinking. I should have been more precise - I meant tokenized. So you are grouping on the field that uses

Re: Grouping on Exact Match

r Arnautović [mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:16 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match > > Hi Gopesh, > You are probably grouping on field that is analysed so “Consulting” is group > term. Wh

RE: Grouping on Exact Match

...@sematext.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:16 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match Hi Gopesh, You are probably grouping on field that is analysed so “Consulting” is group term. What you need to do is to have name field that is not alalysed and group

Re: Grouping on Exact Match

he results but the groups are not happening on the exact > match. For Example : I have 5 documents with name Construction Company, > Construction Tower, Tower Company, Tower House and again Construction > Company. If I search for Construction Company with grouping I am getting > resul

Grouping on Exact Match

Hello All, I am grouping the results but the groups are not happening on the exact match. For Example : I have 5 documents with name Construction Company, Construction Tower, Tower Company, Tower House and again Construction Company. If I search for Construction Company with grouping I am

Re: Phrase Exact Match with Margin of Error

> > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select? > debugQuery=on=on= > > manu:%22Bridge%20the%20gat~1%20between%20your%20skills% > > 20and%20your%20goals%22=complexphrase > > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:59 AM, Max Bridgewater < > > max.bridgewa..

Re: Phrase Exact Match with Margin of Error

with multiple tokens. Then construct a query which searches both field1 for an exact match, and field2 using ComplexQueryParser (use the localparams syntax) to combine them. Boost the field1 (exact match). HTH -Simon On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Max Bridgewater <max.bridgewa...@gmail.com>

Re: Phrase Exact Match with Margin of Error

x Bridgewater < > max.bridgewa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to do phrase exact match. For this, I use > > KeywordTokenizerFactory. This basically does what

Re: Phrase Exact Match with Margin of Error

%20and%20your%20goals%22=complexphrase On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:59 AM, Max Bridgewater <max.bridgewa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to do phrase exact match. For this, I use > KeywordTokenizerFactory. This basically does what I want to do. My field > type

Phrase Exact Match with Margin of Error

Hi, I am trying to do phrase exact match. For this, I use KeywordTokenizerFactory. This basically does what I want to do. My field type is defined as follows: In addition to this, I want to tolerate typos of two or three

Re: Exact match works only for some of the strings

Hello Gintas, >From the first letter I've got that you use colon to separate fieldname and text. But here it's =, which is never advised in lucence syntax. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Gintautas Sulskus < gintautas.suls...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your replies. > Sorry,

Re: Exact match works only for some of the strings

Hi, Thank you for your replies. Sorry, forgot to specify, I am using Solr 4.10.3 (from Cloudera CDH 5.9.0). When I search for name:Guardian I can see both "Guardian EU-referendum" and "Guardian US" in the result set. The debugQuery results for both queries are identical

Re: Exact match works only for some of the strings

Hello, I've tested on an old solr 4.3 instance and the schema and the field definition are fine. I've also checked that only the query nameExact:"Guardian EU-referendum" gives the result, the other one you have commented (nameExact:"Guardian US") gives 0 hits. Maybe, you forgot to re-index after

Re: Exact match works only for some of the strings

You can try to check debugQuery to understand how this query is parsed: double quotes hardly compatible with KeywordTokenizer. Also you can check which terms are indexed in SchemaBrowser. Also, there is Analysis page at Solr Admin. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Gintautas Sulskus <

Exact match works only for some of the strings

Hi All, I am trying to figure out why Solr returns an empty result when searching for the following query: nameExact:"Guardian EU-referendum" The field definition: The type definition: The analysis, as expected, matches the query parameter against the stored value. Please take

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Hi, how about q=code_text:bolt*=code_text:bolt Ahmet On Thursday, March 2, 2017 4:41 PM, Сергей Твердохлеб <selik...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Again, depending on your case, you can use functions in fl to return additional indicator if doc is exact match or not: q=code_text:bolt OR whatever=*,isExact:tf('code_text_exact', 'bolt') It will return isExact field with values >0 for any doc that has term 'bolt' in code_text_exact fi

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

erently to get different score for different matches: >> >> code_text_exact:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt >> >> If you want to use wildcards, you can use similar approach: >> >> code_text:bolt^10000 OR code_text:bolt* >> >> HTH, >> Emir >> >

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

ifferently to get different score for different matches: > > code_text_exact:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt > > If you want to use wildcards, you can use similar approach: > > code_text:bolt^1 OR code_text:bolt* > > HTH, > Emir > > > On 02.03.2017 14:41, Сергей

Re: Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

: Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}. When I search for "bolt" I want to get both results, but somehow grouped, so I can determine either it was found with exa

Distinguish exact match from wildcard match

Hi, is there way to separate exact match from wildcard match in solr response? e.g. there are two documents: {code_text:bolt} and {code_text:bolter}. When I search for "bolt" I want to get both results, but somehow grouped, so I can determine either it was found with exact or non-e

Re: Boosting exact match fields.

In addition to what was proposed We use the technic described here https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch and it works quite well. Best regards Elisabeth 2016-06-15 16:32 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Benedetti : > In addition to what Erick correctly proposed, > are you

Re: Boosting exact match fields.

In addition to what Erick correctly proposed, are you storing norms for your field of interest ( to boost documents with shorter field values )? If you are, I find suspicious "Sony Ear Phones" to win over "Ear Phones" for your "Ear Phones" query. What are the other factors currently involved in

Re: Boosting exact match fields.

If these are the complete field, i.e. your document contains exactly "ear phones" and not "ear phones are great" use a copyField to put it into an "exact_match" field that uses a much simpler analysis chain based on KeywordTokenizer (plus, perhaps things like lowercaseFilter, maybe strip

Boosting exact match fields.

Hi, I have documents with a field (data type definition for that field is below) values as ear phones, sony ear phones, philips ear phones. when i query for earphones sony ear phones is the top result where as i want ear phones as top result. please suggest how to boost exact matches. PS: I have

Re: Query exact match with ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory

What query are you using? From what you've shown, the exact match should work. Perhaps use a phrase query? And while the analyzer is very cool, it has its limitations, particularly it doesn't show the interactions with the _parser_. So add to the URL and look at the parsed_query bits

Query exact match with ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory

in general but i have one use case is not working and I don't know how to solve it. when I try to make an exact match like below. q=docContent:"dq/ex report" It can't find the match because the worddelimiter is separating the positions on the index but not in the query as I don't want to retr

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

ption:dvd default_searchfield:bracket >> >> And the =query trick will show you exactly how things are actually >> searched, it's invaluable. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Mugeesh Husain <muge...@gmail.com> >>

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

e: Hi, if you are interested phrase query, you should use String field instead of text field in schema like as this will solved you problem. if you are missing anything else let share -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one-o

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

query consists of one term only. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >>> 29. jan. 2016 kl. 11.14 skrev Alessandro Benedetti < >> abenede...@apache.org>: >>> >>> Jan sorry If i insis

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

benefit. > > If you use the edismax and a copy field not tokenised, you can apply the > > boost you want to the exact match, and the query will simply be q=foo. > > And you obtain exactly what you do without the markers. > > > > But please, explain me how your solution a

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

Jan sorry If i insist, but I really don't see the benefit. If you use the edismax and a copy field not tokenised, you can apply the boost you want to the exact match, and the query will simply be q=foo. And you obtain exactly what you do without the markers. But please, explain me how your

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

Hi Derek, What if it does not match other fields but just exact match. From original question I assume it should return such results. It seems to me that you are AND-ing your fields and that is the reason why your query is not returning anything. Can you try just exact match field and see

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

> > Jan sorry If i insist, but I really don't see the benefit. > If you use the edismax and a copy field not tokenised, you can apply the > boost you want to the exact match, and the query will simply be q=foo. > And you obtain exactly what you do without the markers. > > B

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

> Yes I am trying to apply the same search term to all the 4 search fieldsand 1 > of the search field must be an exact match. > > You mentioned "In particular, the pf parameter will automatically apply the > search terms _as a phrase_ against the field specified, reliev

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

Hi Please look at my github repo with a template for a field type allowing exact match. Typical use is with disMax query parser and the “pf” param. See https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 28. jan. 2016 kl. 10

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

thing else let share > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one-of-the-search-fields-only-tp4253786p4253827.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

kenized) copy > field ? > > Cheers > > On 28 January 2016 at 15:22, Jan Høydahl <jan@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Please look at my github repo with a template for a field type allowing >> exact match. Typical use is with disMax query pars

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

gt; if you are interested phrase query, you should use String field instead > of > > text field in schema like as > > > > > > this will solved you problem. > > > > if you are missing anything else let share > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one-of-the-search-fields-only-tp4253786p4253827.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

rtial matches". What does "while" mean - it has to match in other fields as well or result should be scored better if it does but not mandatory to match? For exact match you can use string type instead of text. For querying multiple fields you can take a look at (e)dismax quer

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

a like as this will solved you problem. if you are missing anything else let share -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one-of-the-search-fields-only-tp4253786p4253827.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

ed better if it does but not mandatory to match? For exact match you can use string type instead of text. For querying multiple fields you can take a look at (e)dismax query parser. Regards, Emir -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Suppo

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

Hi, if you are interested phrase query, you should use String field instead of text field in schema like as this will solved you problem. if you are missing anything else let share -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one

implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

- P_ShortDescription - P_CatConcatKeyword - spp_keyword_exact For the spp_keyword_exact field, I want to apply an exact match to it. I have a document with the following information. If I search for 'dvd', this document should not match. However if I search for 'dvd bracket', this document

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/implement-exact-match-for-one-of-the-search-fields-only-tp4253786p4253827.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- -- Benedetti Alessandro Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

Hi Erick and all Yes I am trying to apply the same search term to all the 4 search fieldsand 1 of the search field must be an exact match. You mentioned "In particular, the pf parameter will automatically apply the search terms _as a phrase_ against the field specified, relieving

Re: implement exact match for one of the search fields only?

with a template for a field type allowing > exact match. Typical use is with disMax query parser and the “pf” param. > See https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > 28. jan. 2016 kl. 10.

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

Hi Alessandro Benedetti, Can you check what happens to the below given product_name , just check its score product_name:LAPTOP BATTERY DELL Inspiron 6400 1501 E1505 RD859 UD267 XU937 How is this product comes , ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

of the schema ( field attributes) 3) carefully take care of the handler config Cheers The corresponding results also given in the below link.Now am getting exact match first. http://pastebin.com/rAYrFiB8 Now the problem is Look at the 8th result product_name:Dell Inspiron 15R 15.6-inch Laptop

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

exact match first. http://pastebin.com/rAYrFiB8 Now the problem is Look at the 8th result product_name:Dell Inspiron 15R 15.6-inch Laptop without Laptop Bag by Dell, its not a relevant result can you check How this happens , check the scores. -- View this message in context: http://lucene

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

in the FAQ page of Solr wiki, it is found that if we need to get exact match results first, use a copy field with different configuration. That's why I followed this way. Can you show me this link, as I still find difficult to understand why you are getting this not by default. Have you tried

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

need to get Last three results first, rest of the results can be any order -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211826.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

that if we need to get exact match results first, use a copy field with different configuration. That's why I followed this way. Can you show me this link, as I still find difficult to understand why you are getting this not by default. Have you tried the Analysis tool to verify which kind of terms you

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

9.Laptop -BAG 10.Laptop-BAG I need to get Last three results first, rest of the results can be any order -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211826.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

understand Can you help? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211845.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- -- Benedetti Alessandro Visiting card

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211845.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211788.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

I have two fields, one is copy field. I have to get Exact match results first along with entire result of fuzzy search. field name=product_name type=text_wslc indexed=true stored=true required=true multiValued=false/ field name=dummy_name type=string_ci indexed=true stored=false required=true

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

Hi jack, do you mean exact match over the synonyms ? In that case, with your Analyzer you are not going to be able to see that. You apply index analysis synonym expansion. So for your Index there is no difference between the synonyms, there is no exact match . In this case I would suggest you

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

without bag dell inspiron laptop with bag if i query for dell laptop, the result should be like this dell laptop dell laptop with bag dell laptop without bag dell inspiron laptop with bag Exact match should come first, rest of the things will be in the any order, but should get the same number

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

I did a simple test using out of the Box Edismax ( not even configuring specific params or the phrase field). As expected the exact match comes first. This is because of the norms and the natural way the Edismax boost exact matches. Are you sure you are using a proper query parser ? I did nothing

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

words. When I do this my results is too less compared to search without quotes. But I need the same results without quotes along with exact matches should come first -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211409

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

The quoted search words will be different and it will be any word or more than one word. In the query it's just example -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211410.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

RE: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

:54 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results As explained above, actually I have around 10 lack data not 5 row. It's not about synonyms . When I checked in the FAQ page of Solr wiki, it is found that if we need to get exact match results first, use

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

As explained above, actually I have around 10 lack data not 5 row. It's not about synonyms . When I checked in the FAQ page of Solr wiki, it is found that if we need to get exact match results first, use a copy field with different configuration. That's why I followed this way. -- View

Re: Solr Exact match boost Reduce the results

inspiron laptop with bag Exact match should come first, rest of the things will be in the any order, but should get the same number of results -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211377.html Sent from the Solr - User

How to get exact match along with text edge_ngram

We have item_name indexed as text edge_ngram which returns like results... Please suggest what will be the best approach (like string index (in addition to ...edge_ngram... or using copyField...) to search ALSO for exact matches? e.g. url should return item_name as abc entries only... I tried

Re: Exact match on string field with special characters

I may have provided too much background story for my question. What I am trying to do at the core here, is an exact match on a single field. I do this programmatically by reading the field value from the facet query and setting it equal to the field name for a subsequent search

Re: Exact match on string field with special characters

Shoot I just noticed the error in my original post which would certainly cause confusion. Instead of query.addFacetField(fq); I meant to write query.setParam(fq, fg); Sorry. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-match-on-string-field-with-special

RE: Exact match on string field with special characters

: Exact match on string field with special characters I may have provided too much background story for my question. What I am trying to do at the core here, is an exact match on a single field. I do this programmatically by reading the field value from the facet query and setting it equal

Exact match on string field with special characters

I am trying to do SQL like aggregation (GROUP BY) with solr faceting. So I use string fields for faceting - to try to get an exact match. However, it seems like to run a facet query I have to surround the value with double quotes. That poses issues when the field value is green bath towels

RE: Exact match on string field with special characters

org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars(). -Michael -Original Message- From: tedsolr [mailto:tsm...@sciquest.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 5:33 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Exact match on string field with special characters I am trying to do SQL like aggregation (GROUP BY) with solr

Re: Exact match on string field with special characters

faceting. So I use string fields for faceting - to try to get an exact match. However, it seems like to run a facet query I have to surround the value with double quotes. That poses issues when the field value is green bath towels -or- red \cars Those two special characters must be transformed

Re: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

found query: srcphrase:in case if the phrase found -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Tricky-exact-match-unwanted-search-results-tp4158652p4158894.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

*Erick*, thank you for help! For exact match I still want: to use stemming (e.g. for sleep I want the word forms slept, sleeping, sleeps also to be used in searching) to disregard case sensitivity to disregard prepositions, conjunctions and other function words to match only docs having all

Re: Solr: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

, removed all the documents and then re-added them. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Tricky-exact-match-unwanted-search-results-tp4158652p4158748.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

I keep asking people this eternal question: What training or doc are you reading that is using this term exact match? Clearly the term is being used by a lot of people in a lot of ambiguous ways, when exact should be... exact. I think we need to start using the term exact match ONLY

Solr: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

Hi guys, could you help me with implementing exact match search in Solr. Say I have the following Solr documents: And my search query is: By default Solr for the given documents and the search query cat will give all the partially matched documents (cat, pussy cat and cats), but only the cat

Re: Solr: Tricky exact match, unwanted search results

The easiest way to make your examples work would be to use a copyField to an exact match field that uses the KeywordTokenizer (and perhaps a lowercase filter). Then your exact match would be satisfied by a simple wildcard search for cat*. You'll have to be a little careful to escape spaces

Exact match?

If I have a long string, how do I match on 90% of the terms to see if there is a duplicate? If I add the field and index it, what is the best way to return 90%? # terms match # of terms in the field? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: Exact match?

Maybe use dismax for this? Something like q={!dismax qf=field_name mm=90%}query_string, or more verbosely and separately, q=query_stringdefType=dismaxmm=90% Erik On Aug 19, 2014, at 2:43 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote: If I have a long string, how do I match on 90% of

  1   2   3   >