RE: Solr Doc Site Down?

Thank, Look like it is backup now. Matt -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 9:42 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Doc Site Down? On 12/1/2016 9:11 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote: > FYI - This morning I

Re: Solr Doc Site Down?

On 12/1/2016 9:11 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote: > FYI - This morning I am no longer able to access - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide I tried it when I saw this, and it worked. Then I popped in the Infra hipchat channel to ask them whether your IP (found

Re: Solr Doc Site Down?

Yup, same for me - see -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Dec 1, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote: > > FYI - This morning I am no longer able to access - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide > >

Solr Doc Site Down?

FYI - This morning I am no longer able to access - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide Matt

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

which indicates >> > when these docs were generated. >> > >> > We also have to ensure that any old doc doesn't overwrite any new doc in >> > solr. So to achieve this we were thinking if we can make use of the >> > _version field in solr doc and set the _ver

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

On 12/23/2015 10:30 AM, Debraj Manna wrote: > For my use case I tried document centric versioning as mentioned here > . > But In my case this is not working I

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

Thanks Shawn. But after making the below changes (making versionable_chain as default) all my update,inserts & deleteByQuery are failing with the error "*Error from server at http://localhost:/solr/discovery : DistributedUpdateProcessor must follow

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

Thanks Shawn :) . On Dec 24, 2015 1:12 AM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote: > On 12/23/2015 12:25 PM, Debraj Manna wrote: > > Thanks Shawn. But after making the below changes (making > versionable_chain > > as default) all my update,inserts & deleteByQuery are failing with the > >

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

On 12/23/2015 12:25 PM, Debraj Manna wrote: > Thanks Shawn. But after making the below changes (making versionable_chain > as default) all my update,inserts & deleteByQuery are failing with the > error "*Error from server at http://localhost:/solr/discovery >

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

ts writing > concurrently > > to solr. Each of the doc is having an 'timestamp' field which indicates > > when these docs were generated. > > > > We also have to ensure that any old doc doesn't overwrite any new doc in > > solr. So to achieve this we were thi

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

4 Dec 2015 22:47:43 +0530 > : From: Debraj Manna <subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > : Subject: Providing own _version field in solr doc > : > : We have a use case in which there are multiple clients writing &g

Providing own _version field in solr doc

if we can make use of the _version field in solr doc and set the _version field equal to the 'timestamp' field that is present in each doc. Can someone let me know if the approach that we thought can be done? If not can someone suggest some other approach of achieving the same with minimum calls

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

o solr. Each of the doc is having an 'timestamp' field which indicates > when these docs were generated. > > We also have to ensure that any old doc doesn't overwrite any new doc in > solr. So to achieve this we were thinking if we can make use of the > _version field in solr doc and s

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

currently > to solr. Each of the doc is having an 'timestamp' field which indicates > when these docs were generated. > > We also have to ensure that any old doc doesn't overwrite any new doc in > solr. So to achieve this we were thinking if we can make use of the > _version f

Re: Providing own _version field in solr doc

r-user@lucene.apache.org : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Providing own _version field in solr doc : : We have a use case in which there are multiple clients writing concurrently : to solr. Each of the doc is having an 'timestamp' field which indicates : when these docs were generated. :

RE: Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates

:36:25] Thanks Regards, Arjun M -Original Message- From: ext Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 11:08 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates In order for Atomic Updates to work

Re: Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates

: Monday, August 04, 2014 11:08 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates In order for Atomic Updates to work, all your fields must be stored in the index. In this case, ClusterId is not stored and is therefore lost on an atomic update. -- Regards

Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates

Hi, I have a field in my solr schema as below. field name=ClusterId indexed=true type=string stored=false required=false / After updating some docs via SolrInputDocument, I am not able to query the updated docs with ClusterId field i.e., when I query using ClusterId

Re: Query regarding Solr doc atomic updates

In order for Atomic Updates to work, all your fields must be stored in the index. In this case, ClusterId is not stored and is therefore lost on an atomic update. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) arju...@nsn.com wrote: Hi,

Re: Duplicating a Solr Doc

On further investigation: DocumentBuilder.loadStoredFields() is used in one utility function which is only called from one unit test. This should be considered dead code. Don't use it. SolrPluginUtils.docListToSolrDocument() SolrPluginUtilsTest.testDocListConversion() On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at

Duplicating a Solr Doc

Right now I am doing some processing on my Solr index using Lucene Java. Basically, I loop through the index in Java and do some extra processing of each document (processing that is too intensive to do during indexing). However, when I try to update the document in solr with new fields (using

Re: Duplicating a Solr Doc

It seems like this is a way to accomplish what I was looking for: CoreContainer coreContainer = new CoreContainer(); File home = new File(/home/max/packages/test/apache-solr-1.4.1/example/solr); File f = new File(home, solr.xml);

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

no help ? =( -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p1114172.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

related technologies and have never needed to know the difference between a SolrDocument and a LuceneDocument or how the UpdateHandler chains. So I'm curious about what your ultimate goal is with these questions. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

i write a little thesis about this. and i need to know how solr is using lucene -in which way. in example of using dih and searching. so for my better understanding .. ;-) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p1118089.html Sent from

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

. can anyone give me some tipps ? SolrIndexWriter is using from UpdateHandler and SolrindexWriter use IndexWriter from Lucene ? thx for your help =)=) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p1088334.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

oh, i see that i mixed DIH classes with other Solr classes ^^ -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p1088738.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

, that make sense, but why is in class AddUpadeteCommand.java this: // Higher level SolrInputDocument, normally used to construct the Lucene Document // to index. public SolrInputDocument solrDoc; thx =) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc

Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p995922.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

Stockii, Solr's index is a Lucene Index. Therefore, Solr documents are Lucene documents. Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p995968.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

/solr/DataImportHandler?highlight=(dih) so its a little bit confused. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p996005.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

documents. Understand that Lucene is working behind the scenes, but you really don't need to worry about that all that often. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p996425.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

i want to learn more about the technology. exists an issue to create really an solrDoc ? Or its in the code only for a better understanding of the lucene and solr border ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p99.html Sent from

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

in Solr the details about the field types (stored, indexed, etc...) are handled by the schema, and are not distinct per Field instance. http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/common/SolrDocument.html : -- : View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

Document ?! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p997196.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

solr doc

Hello all, I'm looking for a doc that full-fill the following situation? How can two solr servers synchronised with each other ? And if one of them down for whatever reason the how other one can take over... does solr has anything like master/slave tajke over ? any docs or suggestions are

Re: solr doc

keep a slave handy as the second aster and if the real master goes down let the second one take over. On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM, dudes dudes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I'm looking for a doc that full-fill the following situation? How can two solr servers synchronised with

Re: solr doc

Take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM, dudes dudes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I'm looking for a doc that full-fill the following situation? How can two solr servers synchronised with each other ? And if one of them down

RE: solr doc

thanks :) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:54:20 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr doc Take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:44 PM, dudes dudes wrote