Have anybody tried to tweak AnalysingSuggester with ngram token filter to
expand such infix queries?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/2/2017 8:15 AM, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
> > regardless of the value of such a use-case, there is another thing
> >
Currently you would have to supply some custom Streaming Expressions to do
the kind of range faceting you are doing above.
There are two aggregation Streaming Expressions currently:
rollup: Does a MapReduce rollup over buckets. This means all tuples
matching a query are sorted and partitioned
David,
I hardly get the way which IDs are assigned, but beware that repeating
uniqueKey
value causes deleting former occurrence. In case of block join index it
corrupts block structure: parent can't be deleted and left children orphans
(.. so touching, I'm sorry). Just make sure that number of
Yes, think of the starving orphan records…
Ours is an eCommerce system, selling mostly shoes. We have three levels of
nested objects representing what we sell:
- Product: Mostly title and description
- Item: A specific color and some other attributes, including price. Products
have 1 or more
Hi,
are you using HDFS? According to the documentation the feature should be
only available if you are using HDFS. For me it did however also fail on
that. See the thread "Solr on HDFS: AutoAddReplica does not add a
replica" from about two weeks ago.
regards,
Hendrik
On 02.02.2017 07:21,
Following up on my previous email, the intermittent server unavailability
seems to be linked to the interaction between Solr and Zookeeper. Can
somebody help me understand what this error means and how to recover from
it.
2017-02-02 09:44:24.648 ERROR
Hi,
NLP4L[1] has not only Learning-to-Rank module but also a module which calculates
click model and converts it into pointwise annotation data.
NLP4L has a comprehensive manual[2], but you may want to read "Click Log
Analysis"
section[3] first to see if it suits your requirements.
Hope this
Hi,
on startup Solr 6.4.0 logs the following warning:
o.a.s.c.SolrResourceLoader Solr loaded a deprecated plugin/analysis
class [solr.SynonymFilterFactory]. Please consult documentation how to
replace it accordingly.
What documentation? As far as I can see, there's nothing at
Might be that your overseer queue overloaded. Similar to what is
described here:
https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/203959903-Bringing-up-downed-Solr-servers-that-don-t-want-to-come-up
If the overseer queue gets too long you get hit by this:
David,
Can you make sure your index doesn't have deleted docs? This can be seen
in SolrAdmiun.
And can you merge index to avoid having them in the index?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:29 AM, David Kramer
wrote:
>
>
> Some background:
> · The data involved is
Hello Sir,
I am writting query for getting response from specific index content first.
eg.
http://192.168.200.14:8983/solr/mypgmee/select?q=*blood*=id:(*/939/* OR
**)=id=json=true
In above query I am getting response, Means suppose I Get 4 result for course
"939" out of 10. It works fine by
Hi Mohan,
I ran your Case #1 through Solr 4.9.0’s Admin UI Analysis pane and I can see
the analyzer for the field type “text_ar" analyzer does not remove all
diacritics:
Indexed original: المؤسسة التجارية العمانية
Indexed analyzed: مؤسس تجار عمان
Query original: الموسسة التجارية
Query
When i try to rollback from 6.4.0 to my original version of 6.0.1 it now
throws another issue. Now I cant go to 6.4.0 nor can I roll back to 6.0.1
Could not load codec 'Lucene62'. Did you forget to add
lucene-backward-codecs.jar?
at
While migrating from Solr legacy faceting to Solr streaming API, how to
implement the below parameters:
= true
= {!key=age_ranges}age
= 0
= 100
= 10
= {!key=price_ranges}price
= 0
= 1000
= 50
= a_field
= 1
How can I implement these parameters using the new facet streaming with
On 2/2/2017 7:36 AM, Cliff Dickinson wrote:
> The SynonymGraphFilter API documentation contains the following statement
> at the end:
>
> "To get fully correct positional queries when your synonym replacements are
> multiple tokens, you should instead apply synonyms using this TokenFilter
> at
Hi Erick, All,
regardless of the value of such a use-case, there is another thing that
stays unknown for me.
Does SOLR support a simple and silly 'exact substring match'? I mean, is
it possible to search for (actually filter by) a raw substring without
tokenization and without any kind of
Can I assume that without a leader the shard will not respond to write
requests? I can search on the collection. If I can't update docs or add any
new docs then this becomes an emergency.
Erick Erickson wrote
> It's worth a try to take down your entire cluster. Bring one machine
> back up at a
Thanks Hendrik. Iam baffled as to why I did not hit this issue prior to
moving to 6.4.0.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Hendrik Haddorp
wrote:
> Might be that your overseer queue overloaded. Similar to what is described
> here:
>
On 2/2/2017 6:16 AM, deepak.gha...@mediawide.com wrote:
> I am writting query for getting response from specific index content first.
> eg.
> http://192.168.200.14:8983/solr/mypgmee/select?q=*blood*=id:(*/939/* OR
> **)=id=json=true
>
> In above query I am getting response, Means suppose I Get
I've been eagerly awaiting the release of the new SynonymGraphFilter in
Solr 6.4. We have the need to support multi-word synonyms, which were
always problematic with the old SynonymFilterFactory. I've upgraded to
Solr 6.4 and replaced the old filter with the new one, but am not seeing
the
On 2/2/2017 7:23 AM, Ravi Solr wrote:
> When i try to rollback from 6.4.0 to my original version of 6.0.1 it now
> throws another issue. Now I cant go to 6.4.0 nor can I roll back to 6.0.1
>
> Could not load codec 'Lucene62'. Did you forget to add
> lucene-backward-codecs.jar?
> at
Yes. If indexing went through you'd lose docs so indexing will fail.
Querying will fail too unless you set shards.tolerant.
You really wouldn't want your docs lost is the reasoning.
On Feb 2, 2017 6:56 AM, "tedsolr" wrote:
> Can I assume that without a leader the shard
Thanks, for responding. Mikhail. There are no deleted documents. Since I’m
fairly new to Solr, one of the things I’ve been paranoid about is I have no way
of validating my schema.xml, or know whether Solr is even using it (I have
evidence it’s not, more below). So for each test, I’ve wiped
Well, the *whatever* syntax will work.
(that's asterisk-whatever-asterisk if funky bolding happens). You'd
use it on a "string" field (unanalyzed, case sensitive) or perhaps on
some field with KeywordTokenizerFactory possibly followed by
LowercaseFilterFactory if you wanted case-insensitive
On 2/2/2017 8:15 AM, Maciej Ł. PCSS wrote:
> regardless of the value of such a use-case, there is another thing
> that stays unknown for me.
>
> Does SOLR support a simple and silly 'exact substring match'? I mean,
> is it possible to search for (actually filter by) a raw substring
> without
Steve and Shawn, thanks for your replies/explanations!
I eagerly await the completion of the Solr JIRA ticket referenced above in
a future release. Many thanks for addressing this challenge that has had
me banging my head against my desk off and on for the last couple years!
Cliff
On Thu, Feb
Thanks Shawn. Yes I did index some docs after moving to 6.4.0. The release
notes did not mention anything about format being changed so I thought it
would be backward compatible. Yeah my only recourse is to re-index data.
Apart from that it was weird problems overall with 6.4.0. I was excited
>
> so migrating by replacing nodes is going to be a bother.
Not sure what you mean by migrating and replacing nodes, but these two new
actions on the Collections API as of Solr 6.2 may be of use:
-
Hi,
I have a Solr instance setup with one core named as Book (contains total
100 records and a field isprimary:1 has 50 records)
When I querying, bring me accurate results (50), its simple I know:
http://localhost:7161/solr/Book/select?q=%3A=IsPrimary%3A1=10=xml=true
But When I query like this
Oh, missed that limitation.
Seems like something that would be very handy in all installations. I don’t see
a way to add replicas through the UI, so migrating by replacing nodes is going
to be a bother.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
bq: I don’t see a way to add replicas through the UI, so migrating by
replacing nodes is going to be a bother
There's a lot of improvements in the admin UI for SolrCloud that I'd
love to see. Drag/drop replicas would be really cool for instance.
At present though using
Hi Cliff,
The Solr query parsers (standard/“Lucene” and e/dismax anyway) have a problem
that prevents SynonymGraphFilter from working: the text fed to your query
analyzer is first split on whitespace. So e.g. a query containing “United
States” will never match multi-word synonym “United
32 matches
Mail list logo