for myself, ways to wire in flexible configuration
into Solr and what his thoughts on it might be.
Erik
On 4/7/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my opinion on this matter... a StandardRequestHandler
shouldn't even need to be subclassed to plug in different query
Passing on Howard's reply...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 7, 2006 5:00:31 PM EDT
To: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microkernal architecture (was Re: XML Query)
Cool.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Yonik
Hoss, I've seen you mention plugin several times... I presume you
mean a custom request handler. If not, could you elaborate on what
you mean?
Thanks,
Erik
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Focus on the interface:
: - how clients will specify what extra
David,
Solr doesn't index XML files, but rather XML is used as the wrapper
of the text that does get indexed. The document structure is defined
in schema.xml, and the field text to be indexed is sent wrapped in an
XML request.
Regarding your scenario, you would need to write code that
On May 12, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Michael Levy wrote:
One nice feature of INQUERY is that you can create one large SGML
file, containing lots of records, each bracketed with DOC and /
DOC tags. Submitting that big SGML document for indexing goes
very fast.
I believe that Solr indexes one
Brian,
I'd love to give any RoR bindings a try if you're a point to share.
I can see all sorts of interesting fun that can be had with such
bindings, such as pulling schema.xml from the server and using its
field definitions to build mapping objects (like ActiveRecord),
support for all
On Jun 7, 2006, at 3:45 AM, Paul Terray wrote:
I am trying Solr for some projects and I am very impressed by its
simplicity
and clarity of use.
I am trying to make an index: Is there any way to get a list of all
indexed
terms for a field (especially a string or text one)?
Out of the
On Jun 7, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I do still
need to do these kinds of inverted sets somehow.
One problem is that not() needs to know how large the sets are. I
could add a DocSet.flip(int maxDoc) or a DocSet.flip(int startIndex,
int endIndex) or something like that... but a
On Jun 15, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: are linked to the one being written, think relationships here). I'm
: having difficulty customizing the output because XMLWriter's
: constructor is package protected. Is there a performance or API
: reason we need this class to be
On Jun 15, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 6/15/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a way to hook into the response writing by leveraging the ever
improving Solr codebase and its utilities rather than copy/pasting
would be a nice way to aim, I think.
It's a double
On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:07 AM, Pace Davis wrote:
Ok, before I go start writing a new request handlerlet me ask a
dumb
question and see if I am approaching this wrong in Solr. If I am
trying to
search a field where I have one doc with a field that has a value
of Hello
World...if the search
On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Vish D. wrote:
Erik, when do you plan on having your implementation refactored
with good
use of code?
This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked
implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size,
so I'm now at the point
On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked
implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size,
so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using
I'm trying to fully understand the LRUCache and the autowarmCount
parameter. Why does it make sense to auto-warm filters and query
results? In my case, if a new document is added it may invalidate
many filters, and it would require knowing the details of the
documents added/removed to
Just as a data point, my team (3 of us) develop on OS X using Solr
with no problems. Two of us are on MacBook Pro's and one poor soul
is on a PowerBook. I know that doesn't help, and I do recall
stumbling into this particular issue or one very much like it a long
while ago (not Solr
Is it possibly a Lucene version mis-match with your Luke using an
older version of Lucene?
I frequently use Luke to peruse Lucene indices (though all on the
same machine).
Erik
On Aug 17, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Lucene index generated by Solr.
On Aug 27, 2006, at 3:27 AM, James liu wrote:
lucene have ChineseAnalyzer and CJKAnalyzer,,,so i can search chinese
keyword with it.
solr have it? if not, how can i add it?
Those analyzers are not part of the core Solr distribution, but you
can add them easily by getting the JAR file from
On Aug 30, 2006, at 2:42 AM, Bruno wrote:
browsing through the message thread I tried to find a trail
addressing file
system crawls. I want to implement an enterprise search over a
networked
filesystem, crawling all sorts of documents, such as html, doc, ppt
and pdf.
Nutch provides
On Aug 28, 2006, at 10:25 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'd like to commit this to the Solr repository. Any objections?
Once committed, folks will be able to use script/plugin
install ... to install the Ruby side of things, and using a binary
distribution of Solr's example application
On Sep 9, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Tim Archambault wrote:
What is faceted browsing? Maybe an example of a site interface
that is
using it would be good. Dumb question, I know.
Faceted browsing is like this: http://shopper.cnet.com/ and http://
www.nines.org/collex
In Collex, the constrain
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Michael Imbeault wrote:
Is it possible in any way to use the MoreLikeThis class with solr
(http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/
similar/MoreLikeThis.html)? Right now I'm determining similar docs
by just querying for the whole body
On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Michael Imbeault wrote:
I haven't looked at the specifics of how MoreLikeThis determine
which items are similar; I'm mainly wondering about performance
here. Yesterday I tried to code myself a poor man's similarity
class (which was nothing more than doing a
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I've implemented the ability to override the default operator with
: q.op=AND|OR. The patch is pasted below for your review.
if i'm reading that right, one subtlety is that new
SolrQueryParser(schema,field) no longer pas attention to
You need to use an untokenized field for facets. I can see we're
going to get this question frequently now - it was mentioned earlier
today in fact. You can use a copyField that is untokenized such
that you can use one field for searching, and one for facets.
You are obviously using a
On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:37 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/Error-in-faceted-browsing-tf2267819.html
...i'll try to update the docs for facet.field to make this more
obvious.
Would it ever make sense to generate facets on a tokenized field?
Maybe the facet implementation
On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Tim Archambault wrote:
I believe there's a way to access MSSQL, MySQL etc. directly with
Lucene,
but not sure how to do this with SOLR.
Nope. Lucene is a pure search engine, with no hooks to databases, or
document parsers, etc. Lots of folks have built these
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
How about another approach - expose all Solr admin data via HTTP/
XML, just like it's done with search requests?
i think that would be fantastic. thinking of solr as a hard core
service above and beyond lucene exposing all of its
On Sep 24, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/24/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...perhaps some authentication/
authorization as well as HTTPS should eventually make it into the
core, but getting more fine grained is unnecessary...
If meaningful URLs are used
I certainly agree that a JMX interface into Solr would be nice to
have. [a different topic: I've also been thinking Solr under
NetKernel would be a nice fit also]
On Sep 24, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
Also security / firewall doubts would not concern the core and its
security
Kevin,
I've just tried this locally using the tutorial example data, using
both a default (in schema.xml) of AND and OR. (I use the Ruby
response writer because it's easier to read than XML ;)
Use the default operator from schema.xml:
, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, so I'm beginning to get it. If we build Solr with JMX support,
the admin HTTP/XML(err, Ruby) interface could be written into the JMX
HTTP adapter as a separate web application, and allowing users to
plug it in or not. If I'm understanding that correctly
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Well, for long-hanging fruit (autumn Virginia apples):
uh, it's been a long day: http://www.pacificviewpress.com/children/
longisadragon.html
but i meant low-hanging fruit.
* In a read-only fashion, everything from stats.jsp
Are you ensuring that the %s replacements are properly encoded for XML?
Erik
On Oct 11, 2006, at 7:54 AM, mark wrote:
that just returns the null pointer exception.
I have checked my schema and doc:
Schema:
field name=id type=string indexed=false stored=true/
field
On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:24 AM, climbingrose wrote:
Is it true that Solr is mainly used for applications that rarely
change the
underlying data?
No, not at all. Solr is very dynamic, and in fact shines even more
than plain Lucene when the data changes frequently.
As I understand, if
On Oct 12, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
I agree ... comments various people have made over the last few
weeks or
so have gotten me thinking that standardizing the way errors are
returned to the HTTP client (for both updates and selects) is one
of the
biggest API problems in
On Oct 20, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
We have a well-developed browsing design, so I'd rather not mix
facets in with that. Two other things work against using facets:
most of our queries are known-item searches, and I think that
facets work best when there is very broad agreement
On Nov 13, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
That reminds me ... i seem to remember someone saying once that
Nutch lso
builds word based n-grams out of it's stop words, so searches on the
or on won't match anything because those words are never indexed
as a
single tokens, but if a
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
CommonGrams itself seems to have some other dependencies on nutch
because
of other utilities in the same class, but based on a quick skim,
what you
really want is the nested private static class Filter extends
TokenFilter which doesn't
Mike,
Yes, Solr needs to be running within a Java web application server to
operate. Like a database server, for example.
Try Movie.find_by_solr, not lowercase movie. find_by_solr is a
class-level method, not an instance method.
Erik
On Dec 18, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Mike Beccaria
On Dec 18, 2006, at 8:36 PM, Mike Beccaria wrote:
Another question...
The controller:
@query= Movie.find_by_solr(params[:squery])
Then in the view:
label%= @query %/label
Debugging tip: use %= debug @query % to see exactly what you got.
Produces 2 hits (as per count_by_solr) that look like
What is the advantage to running multiple indexes from a single Solr
instance over multiple Solr instances each serving a single index?
Erik
On Dec 21, 2006, at 3:26 PM, escher2k wrote:
I looked at the forums and found that it is not possible to have
multiple
indexes associated
On Dec 28, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Giri wrote:
Do you have any simple tutorial that explains how to enable the
faceted
search in solr? I wouold appreciate if you point me to some resource.
The wiki is the best source of information on Solr. For facets, look
here:
Thorsten - there is support for the Lucene Highlighter built into
Solr. You can see details of how to use it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
Erik
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:26 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Hi all,
I need to implement a summary function with
application generator) needs to have the
ASL attached to it, or how this sort of thing should be handled.
Thanks!
Erik
-Yonik
On 1/2/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finally kicking off that long dreamed of Ruby/Solr DSL, including
an accompanying general purpose web
On Jan 2, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Zaheed Haque wrote:
Great! Wow!
Well, as you've noted, it's still in its infancy. Being impressed
will come a few weeks later, at least :)
What are the difference between flare and act_as_solr as of today?
As of today, tons... since acts_as_solr actually
On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:39 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
However I still think the highlighter should return unescaped tags for
highlighting. There is IMO no benefit for the current behavior.
That really isn't practical. Suppose the prefix were and the
suffix were ? It would return invalid
should
evolve fairly quickly over the next few weeks.
Erik
On 1/2/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finally kicking off that long dreamed of Ruby/Solr DSL,
including
an accompanying general purpose web interface to showcase the
greatness of Solr's capabilities
Zaheed,
All great questions. My answers will be vague, since I'm still in
the early stages of how this will work, but I'll provide what I can
below
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Zaheed Haque wrote:
1. Are you thinking of any user/password/my page/settings what not...
for
On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:59 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: The issue is best described with an example:
: search for canon - matches multiple categories, which will have very
: different schemas
: http://cnet.search.com/search?
chkpt=astg.cnet.fd.search.cnetq=canontag=srch
I just so happen to
The idea of having Solr handle various document types is a good one,
for sure. I'm not sure what specifics would need to be implemented,
but I at least wanted to reply and say its a good idea!
Care has to be taken when passing a URL to Solr for it to go fetch,
though. There are a lot of
On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: with a single schema -- but dynamicFields are used to store
category
: specific fields, so that if you are doing a category specific
search,
: category specific filters can be offered to you...
:
:
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Peter McPeterson wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying this solr ruby DSL called Flare/solrb and I
don't really know how the faceted search works because I cant add
whatever fields I want to to the index. This is currently not working:
conn =
Way to go Bess! This is great stuff you're sharing.
I have a question though...
On Jan 16, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Bess Sadler wrote:
Currently, we are assigning all fields, no matter what language to
type string, defined as
fieldtype name=string class=solr.StrField
sortMissingLast=true/
On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Maximilian Hütter wrote:
Is there
a XMLQueryParser yet? I didn't find it in the source.
Yes - it's part Lucene's contrib area:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/contrib/xml-query-
parser/
You'll have to build the JAR and put it into Solr's
On Jan 21, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 1/21/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I think different syntaxes in different places would be useful.
For example, a user enters a full-text search query that is suitable
to use with Solr's QueryParser, and then the user facets
On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Maximilian Hütter wrote:
Erik Hatcher schrieb:
On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Maximilian Hütter wrote:
Is there
a XMLQueryParser yet? I didn't find it in the source.
Yes - it's part Lucene's contrib area:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk
Tracey,
Thanks for sharing! This is a fantastic case study. Your
experiences and numbers will certainly be a major sales pitch for
bringing Solr into more organizations.
On Jan 27, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Tracey Jaquith wrote:
We've done essentially no optimizing outside of focusing on a
On Jan 29, 2007, at 1:08 AM, zha jimmy wrote:
hi, all
I am try to config solr to support chinese tokenize。
I saw the tips in schema.xml:
!-- One can also specify an existing Analyzer class that has a
default constructor via the class attribute on the analyzer
element
On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: We override defaultOperator of OR to AND.
:
: We really ought to make AND the default anyway.
No, no, no, no, No..
:)
Your argument is a good one, and I buy it. However, I've never had a
case where a user typing
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
if there are cases where DisMax isn't the right choice for raw user
input
... i'm not aware of them, but i'd love to hear about them :)
Ok, ok, ok... I'm a self-admitted dismax avoider thus far. I'll
remedy that by building in dismax
On Jan 29, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
After doing quite a bit of searching what I understand is that the
medicine to my problem of word count is in docTermFreq and
TermEnum ... as Chris Hostetter points out clearly for statistical
purpose in the post below. (Please note I am
On Jan 29, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 1/29/07, escher2k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about the syntax for doing an OR filter in my
URL. How
do I specify
where ((fq=colA[10 TO 20]) AND (fq=state:USA OR fq=country:USA) ?
Basically,
I am
doing a search for a
On Jan 29, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 1/29/07, Antonio Eggberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it a good practice to do commit after every insert .. is this
what is taking the time.. are there any general rule of thumb.
Definitely don't do a commit after every insert. Do a
I'm happy to apply this soon, as I could use it myself and deprecate
the custom stuff I've done in Collex.
At the very latest, I'll tackle this when unit tests arrive, or maybe
before.
Thanks for the reminder, Bertrand.
Erik
On Jan 31, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Is there an Ant task out there somewhere that can POST bunches of
files
to Solr, doing what the post.sh script does but with filesets?
Great question. And you'd think I'd be able to help, but alas I've
not done this myself.
I've found
Speaking of which, I know we are waiting on some settling of Lucene's
trunk before upgrading, but I'd love to have the *:* QueryParser
syntax. I had a weird issue where I indexed 50k objects recently
with the basic text field schema, and a [* TO *] reported 4
documents, so I tried -[*
On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
contain frequency information. I'd be happy to consider patches that
allow it to provide more information, though I'd like to keep
Good eye, Hoss!
I meant to mention the foreach task, but my Ant committership would
have been revoked :) (just kidding, but it is controversial and this
is why it doesn't exist in Ant itself).
And you can, of course, always exec to curl or to Solr's example
post.sh.
Erik
On
Ok, we have it on good authority that foreach is the way to go for
Ant - POST - Solr.
Erik
Begin forwarded message:
From: Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 1, 2007 8:34:33 AM EST
To: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Posting from Ant
On 01/02/07, Erik
PROTECTED]
Date: February 1, 2007 2:52:24 AM EST
To: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Posting from Ant
yes, there is an antlib (not released, you need to build it yourself)
that does posts, including http forms posting.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antlibs/http/trunk/
On 01/02/07
with it.
Erik
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Thanks, I'll try that out. I hope there aren't any encoding issues...
Nah, how likely is that? I'll report back.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6
Actually, Peter, this is another great starting point for some slick
Ant task wrappers. We could have a whole set of control tasks that
do the optimize, commit, add, delete, and even search.
Erik
On Feb 1, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
#6 solr-client.zip on SOLR-20 is
On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Zaheed Haque wrote:
I think trying to tackle two problem (Learning Solr as well as
solrb/flare) at the
same time is giving the problem. While I was writing the i18n unit
test I found
out the 100% test cov. thats really cool. Now in terms of docs.. I
think it would
Speaking of which, I know Yonik paid particular attention the Lucene
GData Server when it was under active development. How do you
compare Solr to it? Are we getting warmer towards Solr supporting
Atom natively? ;)
Erik
On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:18 PM, rubdabadub wrote:
Hello
of this sort of UI goodness.
Erik
Thanks.
Peter
From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: facet.query question
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 21:19:08 -0500
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Peter McPeterson wrote:
Well
I meant facet.query, not fq, in the example below. fq is a filter
query, whereas filter.query is a, umm, filter.query.
Erik
On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Peter McPeterson wrote:
Well, I think I figured it out. It can be used
Before Solr had facets, I built my own implementation in a much
cruder and less performant way into Collex as custom request handlers.
Now the performance issue of warming up the cache needs to be
addressed. I'm going to upgrade Solr and adjust the application to
work with the built-in
On Feb 2, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/2/07, Michael Kimsal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a devil of a time getting date seaching to work
properly. I've
created a 'date' field in my schema, and I put values like
2005-08-01T23:59:59Z in it.
However, when I run the
On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hmmm, classloader hell...
Yeah, I had a bad feeling about that external lib thing. It's a holy
grail to allow dynamic pluggability in Java, but its much more
difficult than it perhaps should be.
I assume you are putting your analyzer in
On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/3/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
One downside of doing joins is that it makes it pretty hard to
distribute/federate in the future because a document doesn't stand
alone
I'm quite open to NOT having a JOIN in Solr if flattening the model
still provides the querying capability desired. I've not fully
followed the specifics that Yonik has mentioned on this thread, but
it certainly is the case that denormalizing/flattening our domain
does not exactly lend
This week I'm going to be incrementally loading up to 3.7M records
into Solr, in 50k chunks.
I'd like to capture some performance numbers after each chunk to see
how she holds up.
What numbers are folks capturing? What techniques are you using to
capture numbers? I'm not looking for
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/5/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This week I'm going to be incrementally loading up to 3.7M records
into Solr, in 50k chunks.
I'd like to capture some performance numbers after each chunk to see
how she holds up.
What numbers
On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
I've looked through the archives but don't see any specific issue
relating
to my question.
Is there a way to have SOLR return partial matches - words that are
one (or
two or X) letters off the matching word? A search for 'field'
would
Yonik - this is great! Thanks for codifying the use cases and
providing a possible implementation. I'll tinker with this more when
I can.
Erik
On Feb 4, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I was confusing myself too much without nailing down more concrete
examples,
so I
Doesn't the built-in Solr Highlighting feature do the rewrite? If
not, it should. I looked into this once and I believe it does have
this particular bug, but I also vaguely recall it not being
straightforward to rewrite the query at that point in the code.
Erik
On Feb 6, 2007,
Yonik - I like the way you think
Yeah!
It's turtles (err, trees) all the way down.
Erik
/me Pulling the Algorithms book off my shelf so I can vaguely follow
along.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/7/07, Binkley, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the
And to add some fuel to this fire, I'm seeing in the (first 100k of
UVa MARC records) data I'm processing that the facets are sparse with
documents. There are a lot of documents that simply don't have a
subject genre on them, for example... like almost 50%. Maybe the
data will get
On Feb 8, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
You are doing some pretty cool stuff with flare! I am amazed! Now I
have some questions :-)
Thanks!
- Smile and Babel does everything and its so easy so I wonder why
you need ruby/rails for flare? What I mean is that one could get
XML
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/8/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming there is an fq=xxx in the query, could dismax support a
queryless query?
It does seem reasonable for both dismax and the standard request
hander, esp since we have faceting in the mix
On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/9/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try surrounding you mutli-word query in quotes: education_facet:High
School. Also do you want to use the filter query param instead
fq=education_facet:High School
Hopefully having the client
ft and fq work for me!
Erik
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping
whatsoever:
:
: Something like:
: fq=!term f='education_facet'High School
I know yonik isn't
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
Might I suggest:
filter.query
filter.term
filter.future expansion
I like it. While Hoss has a point, though descriptive names do make
a lot of sense too. It has been a bit confusing to explain
facet.query and fq as two different things.
On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Gmail Account wrote:
This would be great! I can't help with the solution but I am very
interested in using it if one of you guys can figure it out.
I can't wait to see if this works out.
And just for the record, Solr drives Collex @ NINES: http://
There is also the possibility of keeping tags with the original
documents and having them individually updated without having to
resend the original full text as well: https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/SOLR-139
And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff
with
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff
with Lucene and Solr already: http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/
search/?
search=rawpageNumber=1index=peelbibfield=bodyrawQuery=dogdigstat
us=
on
FYI, your mailer is always
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff
with Lucene and Solr already: http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/
search
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Kainth, Sachin wrote:
I'm new to solr. I've just installed it and am trying to run the
example. The problem is that the tutorial seems to suggest that you
need Unix to run solr. For example to add a document to the
solr?/lucene? Index you need to do this:
[EMAIL
On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:34 AM, Kainth, Sachin wrote:
Thanks for the replies,
I have now tried using cygwin and the result was this:
Posting file
C:\apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating\example\exampledocs\solr.xml to htt
p://localhost:8983/solr/update
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/12/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just for the record, Solr drives Collex @ NINES: http://
www.nines.org/collex which implements tagging along with faceted and
full-text search. I've recently hacked our system
1 - 100 of 1610 matches
Mail list logo
