On Friday 02 of March 2012 18:13:29 Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
On 03/02/2012 05:55 PM, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
On 03/02/2012 04:06 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote:
There's one more thing confusing for me, when we're in the errata
area.
I mean following two pages
On 03/02/2012 04:06 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote:
On Friday 02 of March 2012 15:41:49 Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
Hi Astronauts,
The errata hierarchy in the Errata tab is:
Errata
Relevant
All Errata - Bugfix Errata - Enhancement Errata - Security Errata
All
All Errata - Bugfix
On Friday 02 of March 2012 18:11:41 Johannes Renner wrote:
On 02/29/2012 05:38 PM, Cliff Perry wrote:
On 02/29/2012 11:05 AM, Johannes Renner wrote:
Hello,
I am investigating into a bug about cloned channels and errata. This
is how to reproduce it on the UI:
1. Clone a channel
On 03/02/2012 04:20 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:57 PM, Duncan Mac-Vicar P. wrote:
As we replaced
some errror messages Redhat with a configurable vendor string
we now get the error message as
Did I miss this patch?
- Or its generic version: make it a vendor restriction and
On 03/05/2012 03:40 PM, Tomas Lestach wrote:
On Friday 02 of March 2012 18:11:41 Johannes Renner wrote:
On 02/29/2012 05:38 PM, Cliff Perry wrote:
On 02/29/2012 11:05 AM, Johannes Renner wrote:
Hello,
I am investigating into a bug about cloned channels and errata. This
is how to reproduce
On 5.3.2012 11:10, Tomas Lestach wrote:
Is the removal of strings with this file as context needed?
That would be really nice, even if we usually do not remove the unused
strings.:(
Challenge accepted.
I run:
git grep 'trans-unit id=' |sed 's/.*trans-unit id=\([^]*\).*/\1/'
| sed
