On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0200, Johannes Renner wrote:
Can you elaborate on the purpose of this change in general? The current
code uses the
Channel.kickstartableChannels
query everywhere (via getKickstartableChannels). The patch seems to
change the semantics for
On 04/05/2013 08:52 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Hmm, I wonder if the current logic is actually correct. It feel that
a kickstartable channel (for the purpose of creating kickstart profile,
for example) would be channel that has at least one kickstartable
tree, or channel cloned from one that has
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:37:07PM +0200, Johannes Renner wrote:
On 03/22/2013 02:55 PM, Michael Calmer wrote:
Hi,
please do not apply these patches. I found out, that it is not correct.
It removes the channels at more places than needed.
I guess the initial patch would be fine, as
On 04/04/2013 04:31 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:37:07PM +0200, Johannes Renner wrote:
On 03/22/2013 02:55 PM, Michael Calmer wrote:
Hi,
please do not apply these patches. I found out, that it is not correct.
It removes the channels at more places than needed.
I
Hi,
please do not apply these patches. I found out, that it is not correct.
It removes the channels at more places than needed.
Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013, 17:33:50 schrieb Johannes Renner:
Hey,
attached is a patch that should take care that only kickstartable channels
are actually returned
On 03/13/2013 05:33 PM, Johannes Renner wrote:
attached is a patch that should take care that only kickstartable channels
are actually
returned by the getKickstartableChannels() method in the ChannelFactory class.
Argh, this fixes ConcurrentModificationException, sorry!
--
SUSE LINUX
Hey,
attached is a patch that should take care that only kickstartable channels are
actually
returned by the getKickstartableChannels() method in the ChannelFactory class.
In addition to the existing query, it is checked if the 'anaconda' package is
included
in all of the returned channels. If
