[spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Boris Hinzer
Hello, can anybody verify this behavior? We are facing the situation, that if we whiteliste local emailadresse the smtp auth is completely skipped. Server is then acting like an open relay for these mailaddresses. In spamdyke.conf we have the following:

Re: [spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Eric Shubert
Boris Hinzer wrote: Hello, can anybody verify this behavior? We are facing the situation, that if we whiteliste local emailadresse the smtp auth is completely skipped. Server is then acting like an open relay for these mailaddresses. In spamdyke.conf we have the following:

Re: [spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Eric Shubert
I believe Sebastian's right. Greylisting won't come into play if the sender is authenticating successfully. Your problem is that authentication isn't happening, for whatever reason. In order to track down the problem, we need to know a bit more about your configuration. Are you using any

Re: [spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Boris Hinzer
We are running standard Plesk qmail and also have SMTP auth enabled. Am 20.05.2010 um 19:40 schrieb Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net: I believe Sebastian's right. Greylisting won't come into play if the sender is authenticating successfully. Your problem is that authentication isn't happening,

Re: [spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Sebastian Grewe
That would still require your clients to actually enable SMTP authentication on their end to do the process of authentication. They have to send the username and password and once approved they are allowed to send. On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:58 +0200, Boris Hinzer wrote: We are running standard

Re: [spamdyke-users] whitelist_senders skipping smpt auth ?

2010-05-20 Thread Eric Shubert
Sorry, I can't answer this. I use qmail-toaster, not plesk. Perhaps a plesk user (or a plesk list) would be helpful. -- -Eric 'shubes' b.hinzer wrote: Could this be, because of the fact that the settings are wrong in /etc/xinet.d/smtp_psa are wrong (or even in wrong order)?