Re: [spamdyke-users] Off topic: Monitoring and reporting

The GraphStat logo is Great! Well done! :) Mirko At 12.52 30/01/2014 -0600, you wrote: I know many of you have the same problem I do with monitoring and reporting -- you need to collect data on pretty much everything and make it presentable (usually to a boss), but you don't have time to

Re: [spamdyke-users] Little Bug if domains are invalid

At 08.51 01/02/2011 +0100, you wrote: On 31 Jan 11, Ulrich C. Manns wrote: I typed by hand: - telnet www.msp-it.com 25 - 220 www.msp-it.com ESMTP - helo mail - 250 www.msp-it.com - mail from:ad@ak - 250 ok - rcpt to:bb@cc - 421 Refused. The domain of your sender address has no

Re: [spamdyke-users] [patch01] TLS hung processes

At 13.10 19/03/2010 +0100, you wrote: At 13.39 19/03/2010 +1100, you wrote: On 19/03/2010 07:15, t...@uncon.org wrote: Started a new thread for this improved patch. This should fix the SSL_accept, SSL_shutdown and SSL_read issues. It temporarily sets the socket to non-blocking and

[spamdyke-users] Frequent zombie processes related to spamdyke

Hi, I read in the mailing list archive that users of previous major version (3) of spamdyke had experienced this behavior. I sometimes find zombie processes (qmail-smtpd) whose parent process is spamdyke. Lately the frequency I'm experiencing this is increasing and now I have at least 2-3

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spam Stats

statistics script, as it need to serve only my own purposes. Virus stats are collected through clamav, bad_sender/rcpt are chkuser GREPs, and so on. Mirko At 16:10 02/09/2009 -0700, you wrote: Sergio Minini (NETKEY) wrote: Mirko Buffoni escribió: div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spam Stats

Hi Eric, At 06:50 03/09/2009 -0700, you wrote: Mirko, That answers the 'pretty formatting' part, but the meat of the sandwich is collecting the stats. I'm afraid that Virus stats are collected through clamav, bad_sender/rcpt are chkuser GREPs, and so on leaves us hanging. :( You can collect

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spam Stats

Goods average between 500 and 2000 daily. Figures are however pretty standard. Spamdyke filters out about 60k attempts daily. Here are yesterday stats: Good : 1025 = 0.68 % Unsure :183 = 0.12 % Virus : 62 = 0.04 % BAD Sender: 5114 = 3.40 % BAD Rcpt :212 =

Re: [spamdyke-users] Configurable rbl dns query types

Hi Teodor, I wrote Sam about this topic time ago. Here is his reply: == Actually, a number of RBLs use CNAMEs to aggregate records. A lot of ISPs use them for their rDNS records too. Removing the CNAME check would cause some problems. I'm much more interested, however, in

Re: [spamdyke-users] Spamdyke relay check ignored when rDNS whitelist keyword is found

Hi Sam, At 19:53 07/05/2009 -0500, you wrote: Actually, this behavior is by design. When a connection is whitelisted, it bypasses _all_ filters, full stop. There's no such thing as a partially whitelisted connection, which seems to be what you're expecting. If I understand your configuration

[spamdyke-users] Again on relay check

Hi, again on relay check topic: shouldn't RELAY_LEVEL_ALLOW_ALL always allow relaying (open relay mode)? in filter.c: case RELAY_LEVEL_NO_CHECK: break; case RELAY_LEVEL_ALLOW_ALL: break; it means, no_check and allow_all are equivalent? shouldn't