Re: [spamdyke-users] Softlimit messages

2015-06-21 Thread Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
Sam, OK, I am convinced - will delete . . Thanks, Phil. On 2015-06-21 09:12, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote: IMHO, everyone should delete the softlimit program from their servers immediately. Not that I have a strong opinion on the matter or anything. :) The softlimit program

[spamdyke-users] Softlimit messages

2015-06-20 Thread Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
People, I played around with the logging verbosity and found if I used debug mode I saw suggestions (commands!?) in the log about remove the softlimit function from the start script for qmail-smtpd - while I was trying to sort out the last bug that was preventing eQmail from working, I did

Re: [spamdyke-users] Softlimit messages

2015-06-20 Thread Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users
IMHO, everyone should delete the softlimit program from their servers immediately. Not that I have a strong opinion on the matter or anything. :) The softlimit program seems like a good idea -- set an upper limit on the amount of RAM a program can use, to guard against memory leaks (but not

Re: [spamdyke-users] Softlimit messages

2015-06-20 Thread BC via spamdyke-users
Wow. So for example, the starting linefor my smtpd-run file looks like this: exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -4v -R -l $LOCAL \ and I can simply change it to this: exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -4v -R -l $LOCAL \ with impunity? On 6/20/2015 5:12