People,
On 2016-05-06 13:10, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
Sam,
On 2016-05-06 02:50, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
You may need to recompile spamdyke-qrv with excessive output and run
it with two "-v" flags to see the details you need. You don't need to
actually
Sam,
On 2016-05-05 22:27, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
Very impressive numbers, thanks for sharing those!
No worries - I plan to keep it up so I can see if gradually improving
the spamdyking has an impact - my own previous setup had almost 100%
blocking rate but with some
Very impressive numbers, thanks for sharing those! Out of curiosity, of the
messages that were delivered, how did you judge if they were spam?
It sounds like the problem is that spamdyke-qrv is accepting messages to
invalid addresses? You can try running spamdyke-qrv manually with the "-v"
