Hi!
On 21 Oct 11, Faris Raouf wrote:
Sam,
It would be nice to know if a message is ALLOWED as a result of whitelisting
as opposed to passing all the normal tests. I'd therefore like to see
WHITELISTED, and more ideally
WHITELISTED-IP/WHITELISTED-RECIPIENT/WHITELISTED-SENDER (etc) in
Sam,
It would be nice to know if a message is ALLOWED as a result of whitelisting
as opposed to passing all the normal tests. I'd therefore like to see
WHITELISTED, and more ideally
WHITELISTED-IP/WHITELISTED-RECIPIENT/WHITELISTED-SENDER (etc) in verbose
mode.
What do you think? Useful or just
I don't see why this can't be done. Once SPF support is added, it
should be pretty trivial to add a flag to control what spamdyke does
with it.
-- Sam Clippinger
Eric Shubert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Sam (et al),
I just came across a situation where I wanted to whitelist a
I would think that SPF would be fairly easy to implement. There are
libraries available (http://www.openspf.org/Implementations).
I'm just looking at this as a more secure (and lazy) way to whitelist a
domain. ;)
Is there something I can do to help move this along?
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I
Hi Arne,
Am 21.10.2008 7:46 Uhr, Arne Metzger schrieb:
Felix Buenemann schrieb am 21.10.2008 05:01:
Hi Arne,
Am 20.10.2008 13:57 Uhr, Arne Metzger schrieb:
Hi,
first of all - Thanks to Sam for this great software! And thanks to
Felix for his nice perl script.
I an not experienced
Hi Felix,
Felix Buenemann schrieb am 23.10.2008 21:33:
Hi Arne,
Am 21.10.2008 7:46 Uhr, Arne Metzger schrieb:
Felix Buenemann schrieb am 21.10.2008 05:01:
Hi Arne,
Am 20.10.2008 13:57 Uhr, Arne Metzger schrieb:
Hi,
first of all - Thanks to Sam for this great software! And thanks to
Vielen Dank für Ihre E-Mail. Ihre Anfrage wird so rasch wie möglich beantwortet.
Für Supportanfragen wenden Sie Sich bitte an:
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: 034 423 43 66
http://support.bexa.ch/
Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.
Freundliche Grüsse
Lucas Bremgartner
--
Bexa GmbH
Tiergarten
Felix Buenemann schrieb am 21.10.2008 05:01:
Hi Arne,
Am 20.10.2008 13:57 Uhr, Arne Metzger schrieb:
Hi,
first of all - Thanks to Sam for this great software! And thanks to
Felix for his nice perl script.
I an not experienced enough to add my feature request - i don't know perl...
How
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Im Auftrag von *nightduke
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 29. April 2008 17:35
*An:* spamdyke users
*Betreff:* Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
Well i prefer analyzing logs...
Plesk is plesk, i mean some people use it and some don't use
:* Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
Well i prefer analyzing logs...
Plesk is plesk, i mean some people use it and some don't use that.
Thanks a lot.
Nightduke
2008/4/29, David Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Nightduke,
sure, just
David Stiller
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. April 2008 12:41
An: spamdyke users
Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
Another thing - did you figure out, how to implement an own programm
into Plesk using the right
template and check for logins? I think the way i did
David i think it will be a great idea to have a php client and also cron
analyzing logs.
Thanks a lot for your sugguestion, can you do that?
Nightduke
2008/4/28, David Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
i made a full Programm for that incl. an overview for Plesk. If you're
interested i
Hi Nightduke,
sure, just give me an hour (or two) to make a package from that, as it's
not very general atm.
I'll publish that on my private site later on and give you a link to
check it out. Do you also
want the stuff for plesk, or just analyzing the logs?
David
nightduke schrieb:
David i
but i am busy with projects
right now and wont be able to work on those scripts for a few days.
--Stefan
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von nightduke
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. April 2008 17:35
An: spamdyke users
Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request
Hi,
i made a full Programm for that incl. an overview for Plesk. If you're
interested i would like
to give it to you. I'm using PHP-CLI and a cron analyzing the logs.
Regards,
David
Marcin Orlowski schrieb:
Jake Briggs wrote:
But seriously, getting simple rough stats from the logs really
users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
Hi,
i made a full Programm for that incl. an overview for Plesk. If you're
interested i would like
to give it to you. I'm using PHP-CLI and a cron analyzing the logs.
Regards,
David
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Stiller
Sent: 28 April 2008 08:07
To: spamdyke users
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
Hi,
i made a full Programm for that incl. an overview for Plesk. If you're
interested i would like
to give it to you. I'm using PHP-CLI
nightduke wrote:
It's possible to create an user interface for to configure
spamdyke.conf file.
Can be added blacklist domains, whitelist domains or ips.
Add or remove rbl,etc...
There already is one, its called vi. Most of the configuration is just
simple lists of things, and a UI
-users] feature request spamdyke user interface
nightduke wrote:
It's possible to create an user interface for to configure
spamdyke.conf file.
Can be added blacklist domains, whitelist domains or ips.
Add or remove rbl,etc...
There already is one, its called vi. Most
Jake Briggs wrote:
But seriously, getting simple rough stats from the logs really is a
simple grep and a quick calculation in the head.
or use of 'wc'
It would be good to know how much spam got through, but that would
require some sort of crystal ball Or a spam reporting mechanism and
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Jake Briggs wrote:
But seriously, getting simple rough stats from the logs really is a
simple grep and a quick calculation in the head.
or use of 'wc'
Since when could wc do addition, subtraction and division ;)
--
Jacob Briggs
Systems Engineer
Jake Briggs wrote:
Since when could wc do addition, subtraction and division ;)
well... since bc. sort of :)
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Suggestion:
For enable/disable type parameters config could change like this:
old form: reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
new form: reject-ip-in-cc-rdns=(on|off|log)
For current settings with values:
old form: ip-blacklist-file=/path/to/file
new form: ip-blacklist-file=(on|off|log):/path/to/file
('off' in
N.Novozhilov wrote:
Why do not comment string which you don't want at the moment?
You do it by commeting it out now).
That's what I wrote too. I just added that if we have a switch system
implemented anyway, it would be a more elegant way to handle it.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:40:59
Why do not comment string which you don't want at the moment?
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:40:59 +0200
Bgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suggestion:
For enable/disable type parameters config could change like this:
old form: reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
new form: reject-ip-in-cc-rdns=(on|off|log)
For
Hi,
I'd love to see sort of test mode. So I could i.e. enable
log-ip-in-cc-rdns which would work the same way known
reject-ip-in-cc-rdns works but without really denying
matching connection. It shall just log it (i.e. as
TEST_IP_IN_CC_RDNS) and that's it. That would be extremely
useful to run on
Very interesting idea. I'll definitely put that one on the list.
-- Sam Clippinger
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I'd love to see sort of test mode. So I could i.e. enable
log-ip-in-cc-rdns which would work the same way known
reject-ip-in-cc-rdns works but without really denying
matching
Now that one I like. :-)
Michael J. Colvin
NorCal Internet Services
www.norcalisp.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Marcin Orlowski
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:50 AM
To: spamdyke users
Subject: [spamdyke-users
Hello,
I really think mail servers shoud reject connections from IP without
rdns, I was tryng to impose it to my customers but I think I must
desist for too much good mail being rejected.
I't could be useful to have a per domain reject-empty-rdns, to
gradually implement this feature.
Just
Hi,
sorry I was not clear.
I mean to enable reject-empty-rdns only for some recipients domains .
Thank you
Ciao
Paolo
Il giorno 14 apr 2008, alle ore 10:30, Andras Korn ha scritto:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Paolo wrote:
I really think mail servers shoud reject connections
The next version of spamdyke already includes this feature.
-- Sam Clippinger
Paolo wrote:
Hi,
sorry I was not clear.
I mean to enable reject-empty-rdns only for some recipients domains .
Thank you
Ciao
Paolo
Il giorno 14 apr 2008, alle ore 10:30, Andras Korn ha scritto:
On
Technically it's possible, yes. However, I don't agree that spammers
don't use ESMTP. I think this feature would not have the effect you want.
Also, qmail does support ESMTP, even without patches.
-- Sam Clippinger
J-P Raymond wrote:
Question,
Would it be difficult/possible to add a
32 matches
Mail list logo
