On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Marcin Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
incoming mails (maybe with exceptions) and even disable
DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it
The stats we have here (small 40 person company) are pretty much evenly
split between greylisting, early talkers and realtime blacklists :D
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
incoming mails (maybe with exceptions) and even disable
DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it yet causes too much
collateral damages I can accept, even 99% of the mails
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:24:47PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how effective
gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all incoming mails (maybe
with exceptions) and even disable DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it yet
causes
When i first installed spamdyke, I used only greylisting. No other
blocks with it.
Prior to spamdyke: 40-60 spams a day (my personal account)
Post spamdyke: 2 in 6+ months.
Now of course your millage may vary based on how you use your account,
server setup, etc. But for me on a personal note,
On 5/9/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So - graylisting - how effective it really is for you?
The only spam blocking I use presently is spamdyke with graylisting.
Pre-spamdyke I was getting 1000 spams/day into my personal mailbox.
Since installing spamdyke with graylisting I get 3-4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of BC
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 11:09 AM
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylisting - how effective it really, is?
On 5/9/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So - graylisting - how
