Hello. How advanced is the pattern matching for whitelist_senders?
Can I write something like: shiptrade*@mobileemail.vodafone.gr and
hope that it gets understood to mean shiptrade1, shiptrade2, etc?
(An actual issue I have right now)
Thanks, -turgut
Many thanks - I somehow failed to read or digest what you had
written.. *blush*
-turgut
On 12/09/2011 12:53 AM, Lutz Petersen wrote:
Hi there. what is the correct format for the whitelist_senders file?
I want to whitelist an entire domain with a borked DNS in the whitelist..
Do I do
Thank you, but these domains would like to be exempt from spamdyke for
their INCOMING mail.
Something like receiver-whitelist-file= option I guess..
-turgut
On 12/13/2011 04:50 PM, Eduard Svarc wrote:
spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org wrote on 13.12.2011 15:28:12:
Some domains I host
Hi.. I seem to have a loop with facebook, the header containing hundreds
of emails..Anyway, I spotted that they are being rejected when I
installed the new version.. is this normal??
Jan 4 23:01:00 panel spamdyke[3047]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from:
rdar...@facebook.com to:
For some reason, we have massive amounts of mail coming from facebook,
to one local user.
I am unable to stop it, because the From is different every time, there
are hundreds of users in the To: header,
and the local recipient is always one local poor guy.
I'm good at C programming and I'd like
Btw, it's hopeless trying to contact Facebook over such issues.
God, I hate big companies with free services.
-turgut
On 01/07/2012 04:39 PM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote:
For some reason, we have massive amounts of mail coming from facebook,
to one local user.
I am unable to stop it, because
the empf.. -t
On 07.01.2012 18:02, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/07/2012 07:39 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote:
For some reason, we have massive amounts of mail coming from facebook,
to one local user.
I am unable to stop it, because the From is different every time, there
are hundreds of users
I had the same problem -- because someone from China is brute-forcing
all info@... accounts.. Once they find an easy password, they abuse
it with millions of spam..
- wrote code to check everyone's passwords for easyness (?) and forced
ppl to change their passwords -- or I changed it for
Btw, did anyone else notice it: If in an SMTP batch, one local user is
over quota or undeliverable, none of the other recipients gets a copy of
the mail?
Even for a mailing list.. One local recipient was over quota, no one got
a copy of postings until I cleared that user's quota..
-turgut
I recently banned all of China from smtp_auth on my server.. No
complaints from legitimate customers so far -- China ranges are
available on the net.
fail2ban is great, use that too.. Perhaps connections-per-source
limiting from xinetd is also a good idea.. Good luck.. -t
On 09/02/2012
hi there. Many of the users who use our servers for SMTP use an
alternate port. So far I didn't have spamdyke running on that port (it
was only running port 25), but I just started it. I disabled many of
its checks, such as missing RDNS, as many of them do not have a reverse
DNS entry
On 03/26/2013 09:15 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Authenticated users pass all tests, so as long as your local users
authenticate (and they should if they don't), you don't need to ease
up any spamdyke rules for local users.
Thank you for your feedback.
I added the following to this new config
Hi there. I recently enabled spamdyke, but when someone uses the horde
webmail, they get an SMTP error 554..
Any ideas what to do?
Many thanks, -turgut
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Hi there.. I recently noticed in horror that a GUI change that I made
via PLESK 12 had removed my spamdyke from /etc/xinetd.d/smtp_psa
Upon reinstating:
server_args = -Rt0 /usr/local/bin/spamdyke
/var/qmail/bin/relaylock /usr/sbin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
ecompiling with excessive output and either
changing your log level to excessive or using the full-log-dir option
to capture a session (which will show the excessive output).
-- Sam Clippinger
On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:33 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org <
hi there. I recently re-installed spamdyke and noticed that it's not
giving a response. I have it on port 1999 now for testing..
here is what happens..
$ telnet pluto.kalfaoglu.net 1999
Trying 176.9.64.42...
Connected to pluto.kalfaoglu.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 pluto.kalfaoglu.net
16 matches
Mail list logo
