Re: [spamdyke-users] softlimit error
A, the ulimit limits. I'd forgotten about those and was focusing on the "softlimit" word in the error. Thanks, Sam. On 5/5/2016 6:35 AM, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote: You're correct that those messages are related to limits, but not the ones softlimit can set. Those messages are about "hard" limits, which are set using the "ulimit" command. I'd guess either BSD has a default hard limit or something on your system is setting them before spamdyke runs. Those limits are extremely high, so there's very little chance they're going to cause any problems, but spamdyke will keep complaining about them as long as log-level is "verbose" or higher. ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] softlimit error
You're correct that those messages are related to limits, but not the ones softlimit can set. Those messages are about "hard" limits, which are set using the "ulimit" command. I'd guess either BSD has a default hard limit or something on your system is setting them before spamdyke runs. Those limits are extremely high, so there's very little chance they're going to cause any problems, but spamdyke will keep complaining about them as long as log-level is "verbose" or higher. -- Sam Clippinger On May 4, 2016, at 3:04 PM, BC via spamdyke-userswrote: > > Now that I've set log-level=excessive, I can see these two errors that > spamdyke is spitting out a lot: > > May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: > ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3226): data segment hard limit is less than > infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 34359738368 > May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: > ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3244): stack size hard limit is less than > infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 536870912 > > Seems to be a harmless error report. > > Per Sam's suggestion quite some time ago, I quit using the 'softlimit' option > in the tcpserver startup "run" files. Available memory >5GiB free all the > time. Very fast CPU. The email part of the server is very lightly used as > the box is primarily an NAS and for me to play and experiment with > intellectually. > > Had no crashes that I know of - been up for 41+ days since my last > intentional reboot. > > Thoughts? > > ___ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
[spamdyke-users] softlimit error
Now that I've set log-level=excessive, I can see these two errors that spamdyke is spitting out a lot: May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3226): data segment hard limit is less than infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 34359738368 May 4 13:54:52 Xeon_Right spamdyke[18726]: ERROR(undo_softlimit()@spamdyke.c:3244): stack size hard limit is less than infinity, could lead to unexplainable crashes: 536870912 Seems to be a harmless error report. Per Sam's suggestion quite some time ago, I quit using the 'softlimit' option in the tcpserver startup "run" files. Available memory >5GiB free all the time. Very fast CPU. The email part of the server is very lightly used as the box is primarily an NAS and for me to play and experiment with intellectually. Had no crashes that I know of - been up for 41+ days since my last intentional reboot. Thoughts? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users