Huang Chen Min wrote:
Dear all:
Forgive for asking such stupid question. I use Xbase way to
understand SQLite.
It is allowed to modify dat type of column in clipper. In my personal
thoughts, Creating a brandnew table and copy those data from older version
might be an alternative way. Is
Agrawal, Manish wrote:
> All the sqlite examples I see use absolute paths to the sqlite database in
> Visual Studio projects, e.g.
> "C:\users\test\apps\db\test.db3".
>
> How can I specify the path to the sqlite database relative to the application
> root folder, e.g.
As of System.Data.SQLite version 1.0.79.0, design-time installer support
is included in the appropriate setup packages. The instructions on the
blog post you linked to should now be considered obsolete.
NOTE #1: Since Visual Studio itself is a 32-bit process, you will need
to install the 32-bit
Ah, I should have thought of that.
When I run the application (Ctrl+F5), the path is created in bin/debug. This is
also the folder where the .exe file is created.
Just a quick note though, when I move the .exe file to the desktop and
double-click on it, it crashes, which suggests that the
On 21 Feb 2012, at 2:49am, "Agrawal, Manish" wrote:
> All the sqlite examples I see use absolute paths to the sqlite database in
> Visual Studio projects, e.g. "C:\users\test\apps\db\test.db3".
>
> How can I specify the path to the sqlite database relative to the application
On 21 February 2012 04:45, Agrawal, Manish wrote:
> I am still playing with the sqlite setup in Visual Studio. Previously I
> found success following the instructions at:
>
>
> http://www.tsjensen.com/blog/2011/06/04/SQLite+On+Visual+Studio+2010+Setup+Instructions.aspx
>
> But
All the sqlite examples I see use absolute paths to the sqlite database in
Visual Studio projects, e.g. "C:\users\test\apps\db\test.db3".
How can I specify the path to the sqlite database relative to the application
root folder, e.g. "db\test.db3"?
This is helpful when I am developing the app
I am still playing with the sqlite setup in Visual Studio. Previously I found
success following the instructions at:
http://www.tsjensen.com/blog/2011/06/04/SQLite+On+Visual+Studio+2010+Setup+Instructions.aspx
But this requires the sqlite packages to be "installed" on the local computer.
Dear all:
Forgive for asking such stupid question. I use Xbase way to
understand SQLite.
It is allowed to modify dat type of column in clipper. In my personal
thoughts, Creating a brandnew table and copy those data from older version
might be an alternative way. Is there any instrument to
David Horne wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help. If you've any other ideas then please let me know.
>
I'm confused, do you actually mean the "System.Data.SQLite.dll" file
(not sqlite.dll)?
Judging from the error message, it seems you may have an extraneous
install of System.Data.SQLite somewhere.
Electric Eddy wrote:
>
> This then popped up an error message dialogue box stating:
>
> Invalid core file image runtime version.
>
You'll want to copy the "Installer.exe" file to your installation directory
first (where the "SQLite.Designer.dll" file resides).
--
Joe Mistachkin
Puneet Kishor wrote:
> is there are way to force the query to return only the "first" match so the
> resulting query has only as many rows as the left
> table?
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (
SELECT 1 FROM a LEFT JOIN b ON a.col = b.col GROUP BY a.rowid);
--
Igor Tandetnik
On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:01:17PM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>>
>> On 20 Feb 2012, at 4:11pm, Puneet Kishor wrote:
>>
>>> is there are way to force the query to return only the "first" match
>>> so
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:01:17PM +, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
>
> On 20 Feb 2012, at 4:11pm, Puneet Kishor wrote:
>
> > is there are way to force the query to return only the "first" match
> > so the resulting query has only as many rows as the left table?
>
David Horne wrote:
Thanks for the link. I ran the tool on sqlite.dll and got the following
error:
IESHIMS.DLL Error opening file. The system cannot find the file specified
(2).
Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found.
Warning: At least one module has an unresolved
Thanks for the link. I ran the tool on sqlite.dll and got the following
error:
IESHIMS.DLL Error opening file. The system cannot find the file specified
(2).
Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found.
Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing
On 20 Feb 2012, at 4:11pm, Puneet Kishor wrote:
> is there are way to force the query to return only the "first" match so the
> resulting query has only as many rows as the left table?
You have two problems:
A) You are JOINing two columns which contain some null values.
On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> Puneet Kishor wrote:
>> But, why is #5 329743 and not 329686? Where are the extra 57 rows coming
>> from? I thought a LEFT JOIN was supposed to include
>> *all* the rows from the left table with NULLs for the columns of
VS is installed on an x64 system so when I build using VS IDE I normally
specify x86.
I don't normally build using MSBuild however, I inserted the line:
x86
in the project file and changed references to Any CPU to x86 and then
rebuilt the installer but get the same error when I run the command.
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> Roger Andersson wrote:
>> This seems to work but I do not fully understand why ;-)
>> sqlite> .header on
>> sqlite> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS History (Path TEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL,
>> Hits INTEGER);
>> sqlite> insert or replace into
In another library, I had to specify "x86" processor because it wasn't designed
for 64-bit machines. Might you need to do that?
RobR
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Electric Eddy
Sent: Monday, February 20,
Puneet Kishor wrote:
> But, why is #5 329743 and not 329686? Where are the extra 57 rows coming
> from? I thought a LEFT JOIN was supposed to include
> *all* the rows from the left table with NULLs for the columns of the right
> table where there was no match. So, at most,
I performed the following steps:
1) Checked out the latest local copy using the command 'fossil update'
2) I opened a Visual Studio command prompt, changed into the tools
installer folder and executed the command MSBuild Installer.2008.csproj
3) I changed into the root/bin/2008/Debug/bin folder
On 02/20/2012 10:16 PM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
Could someone please shed some light on this mystery for me?
1. SELECT Count(*) FROM a;
329686
2. SELECT Count(*) FROM a WHERE a.col IS NULL;
3
3. SELECT Count(*) FROM b;
Could someone please shed some light on this mystery for me?
1. SELECT Count(*) FROM a;
329686
2. SELECT Count(*) FROM a WHERE a.col IS NULL;
3
3. SELECT Count(*) FROM b;
6268
4. SELECT Count(*)
a2 != '' seems redundant when a1 = a2 and a1 != ''
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Electric Eddy wrote:
>
> Maybe not going as far as including updates in the installer for support
> for 2005 but at least a manual process for getting it working in 2005
would
> be very helpful.
>
I've just checked-in preliminary support to the design-time component
installer
for Visual Studio
Just the SQLiteDataAdapter component to work in 2005. I've no immediate
need to compile SQLite from source as the downloadable Setup for .NET is
enabling me build my projects successfully. The problem is I initially
used the designer to create a number of SQLiteDataAdapters and related
components
Electric Eddy wrote:
>
> Maybe not going as far as including updates in the installer for support
> for 2005 but at least a manual process for getting it working in 2005
would
> be very helpful.
>
Out of curiosity, what do you need more, the design-time component installer
to work with Visual
I was just going on the basis of what I paid for the professional version
the last time. Although 2005 is an old version there are a huge number of
developers maintaining legacy systems on this platform, so I would consider
it worthwhile keeping them in the loop, and would be willing to setup a
David Horne wrote:
>
> I get the following runtime error -
>
> System.InvalidOperationException was unhandled
> Message=An error occurred creating the form. See
Exception.InnerException
> for details. The error is:
>
> Could not load file or assembly 'System.Data.SQLite, Version=1.0.79.0,
>
On 20 Feb 2012, at 8:09am, bhaskarReddy wrote:
> While running Data base with sqlite, i am getting error as Data
> base locked.
>
> How to resolve from this error.
Don't lock the database.
Bhaskar, have you ever read any of the documentation or is your first
On 20 Feb 2012, at 7:42am, Kf Lee wrote:
> New to sqlite3. Install 3.7.10 with --prefix=/usr/local and source in
> /usr/locsl/sqlite3-src. Can run sqlite3 test.db when attached to the
> source directory but would get sqlite header and source mismatch if try to
> start
As a new sqlite user, I've written a simple program in VB (Visual Basic
2010 Express), adding a reference to sqlite.dll in the project file. The
following code builds without errors.
Imports System.Data.SQLite
Public Class Form1
Private dbConn As SQLiteConnection
Public Sub New()
Joe
Here is an MS link that describes using/manipulating the command texts , but
I had misinterpreted the instructions .
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tf579hcz.aspx
so , you are correct , no bug , but the behaviour with SqlCommandBuilder is
a bit different which does not null the
Hi Friends,
While running Data base with sqlite, i am getting error as Data
base locked.
How to resolve from this error.
Regards,
Bhaskar.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Data-base-locked.-tp33355225p33355225.html
Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at
36 matches
Mail list logo