qlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Oracle joins the SQLite Consortium
>
>
> Greg,
>
> Thanks for the explanation. So it's Sleepycat license, ok, but we still
> can't use it in an application with proprietary code, right?
>
> It would be interesting to tr
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:46:08 +0100
Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 24 Jun 2010, at 10:38pm, Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
>
> > I can't see anything good coming out of this if there are lawyers
> > involved.
>
> Big North American companies like Oracle don't do /anything/ without
>
On 24 Jun 2010, at 10:38pm, Ted Rolle, Jr. wrote:
> I can't see anything good coming out of this if there are lawyers
> involved.
Big North American companies like Oracle don't do /anything/ without lawyers.
It can't be helped in a country like the USA. Not all lawyers are evil: almost
all
I can't see anything good coming out of this if there are lawyers
involved.
--
__
3.14159265358979323846264338327950 Let the spirit of pi
2884197169399375105820974944592307 spread all over the world!
res of a relational database and SQL92
> in a stunningly small package, we hope to add our world-class btree
> storage layer and experience to that package.
>
> We believe that this is good news for everyone, I hope you feel that way
> too.
>
> -greg
>
> Gregory Burd | Product Ma
://blogs.oracle.com/berkeleydb/
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:d...@hwaci.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 6:59 AM
> To: sqlite-annou...@sqlite.org; General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: [sqlite-announce] Oracle joins the SQLite Consortium
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2010 04:47 AM, Igor Sereda quoted Oracle:
>> The application-level behavior of the two products is identical,
I did test the Oracle version a few months ago and found that statement to
be false. Oracle know about the issues but gave the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:47:12AM -0700, Igor Sereda wrote:
>
> Wow, that's interesting news. Berkeley DB is still GPL/commercial, I guess? I
> hope SQLite will keep on going under public domain, including its B-tree
> level.
>
> Also, here's an interesting statement in the BDB/SQLite
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/sql.html
>
>
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@hwaci.com
>
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Oracle joins the SQLite Consortium
On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:10pm, Francisco Azevedo wrote:
> On 21-06-2010 11:58, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>> guarantees that SQLite will continue to be actively maintained and
>> developed and that i
On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:10pm, Francisco Azevedo wrote:
> On 21-06-2010 11:58, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>> guarantees that SQLite will continue to be actively maintained and
>> developed and that it will not fall under the control of a competitor.
>
> Sorry, but.. isn't oracle the "competitor" ? :)
On 21-06-2010 11:58, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> guarantees that SQLite will continue to be actively maintained and
> developed and that it will not fall under the control of a competitor.
Sorry, but.. isn't oracle the "competitor" ? :)
Francisco A
___
The SQLite developers are pleased to announce that Oracle has joined
the SQLite Consortium.
The SQLite Consortium is a collaboration of major users of SQLite
designed to ensure the continuing vitality and independence of
SQLite. In exchange for sponsorship, SQLite Consortium Members
13 matches
Mail list logo