Re: [sqlite] page checksums (was Re: Bad db feature request)

On Jun 29, 2016 10:14 PM, "Roger Binns" wrote: > > On 29/06/16 19:13, Scott Robison wrote: > > Given the nature of VFS, it is trivial* for anyone to create a module to > > provide this very functionality. So you can write it yourself! > > > > *Not really trivial, but

Re: [sqlite] page checksums (was Re: Bad db feature request)

On 29/06/16 19:13, Scott Robison wrote: > Given the nature of VFS, it is trivial* for anyone to create a module to > provide this very functionality. So you can write it yourself! > > *Not really trivial, but probably not horribly difficult either. VFS is one way you can't reasonably do it. The

Re: [sqlite] page checksums (was Re: Bad db feature request)

On Jun 29, 2016 5:08 PM, "Darren Duncan" wrote: > I notice that the ticket rejection didn't include any rationale or explanation, or I didn't find any when I looked. What was the rationale for rejecting that ticket? > > I believe that SQLite having page checksums would

[sqlite] page checksums (was Re: Bad db feature request)

On 2016-06-29 8:12 AM, Roger Binns wrote: On 29/06/16 07:51, Dominique Devienne wrote: I wish for the day SQLite has page checksums to detect any such random corruption. Agreed. The SQLite team rejected doing so: http://www.sqlite.org/src/tktview/72b01a982a84f64d4284 Yes, I know, it's