At 11:12 PM -0700 9/22/04, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
Ah, ok.. I assumed that since the mention of ?N and :N: was explicitly
added for version 3 that it would be supported, but testing and
looking at the code says otherwise. I'll rework my code to just use
unnumbered params then.
Thanks!
-
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:53:19 -0700, Darren Duncan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The documentation for SQLite 3 is very much out of date and needs to
> be rewritten. In fact, a lot of the site documentation still refers
> to SQLite 2. So you can't always trust what the documentation says
> right
At 10:20 PM -0700 9/22/04, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
Howdy,
I'm trying to prepare statements using the ?n and/or :N: notation
mentioned in the documentation and the sqlite3.h header. However,
trying something like "INSERT INTO foo VALUES( ?1 )" results in
SQLITE_ERROR, with the error string being
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:32:51 -0700, Cory Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was under the impression that the notation was just ? (no ending
> number) and :AAA (no ending colon). Using it like that works fine for
> me.
Yep, plain unnumbered "?" works fine -- however, the docs and
sqlite3.h
I was under the impression that the notation was just ? (no ending
number) and :AAA (no ending colon). Using it like that works fine for
me.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:20:46 -0700, Vladimir Vukicevic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm trying to prepare statements using the ?n and/or :N:
Howdy,
I'm trying to prepare statements using the ?n and/or :N: notation
mentioned in the documentation and the sqlite3.h header. However,
trying something like "INSERT INTO foo VALUES( ?1 )" results in
SQLITE_ERROR, with the error string being 'near "1": syntax error'.
Similar results with
6 matches
Mail list logo
