Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

Stephan Beal wrote: > Just to be pedantic for a moment: the shell is GPL if you #define > USE_READLINE to a true value. Such is the reality of viral licenses. From > shell.c: The shell in its lonesome is never GPL, only the combination with readline is. If you distributed a combination of the

Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Stephan Beal >wrote: > > > But the reality is still: if the sqlite3 shell links with libreadline, it > > is GPL. > > > > > Not. > Sorry, i wasn't clear: the

Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > But the reality is still: if the sqlite3 shell links with libreadline, it > is GPL. > > Not. If *you* distribution binaries of a program that links against readline, then *you* must also be willing to distribute

Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Just to be pedantic for a moment: the shell is GPL if you #define > USE_READLINE to a true value. Such is the reality of viral licenses. From > shell.c: > And to be even more pedantic: that code came from the WRONG

Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Roger Binns wrote: > They are part of the standalone shell (ie not the library). The shell > source code is under the same license as the rest of SQLite (ie as > public domain as possible) so you are free to make a copy and do > whatever

Re: [sqlite] forcing X'' literals in sqlite3's .dump?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/16/2011 04:59 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > In the sqlite3's .dump command's output, the binary blobs may > either be represented as hexadecimal X''-literals, or as text > strings. What evidence do you have for that claim? >