I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty
sure
it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
system, but I couldn't find a reference to which versions I needed for
fre 2007-03-02 klockan 10:02 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton:
I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty sure
it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
system, but I
lör 2007-03-03 klockan 03:29 +1300 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
configure.in:34: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LTDL_DLLIB
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
Looks like aclocal not finding the libtool macros (LTDL
fre 2007-03-02 klockan 10:02 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton:
I know this is a minor problem, but I had problems getting the squid3
bootstrap.sh script to run, so I couldn't test the patch. I'm pretty
sure
it's got something to do with the version of automake and autoconf on my
system, but I
Hi Steven,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bootstrapping
helpers/basic_auth/Makefile.am:6: required directory
helpers/basic_auth/POP3 does not exist
configure.in:3297: required file `helpers/basic_auth/POP3/Makefile.in' not
found
automake failed
Autotool bootstrapping failed. You will need
lör 2007-03-03 klockan 08:39 +0800 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
helpers/basic_auth/Makefile.am:6: required directory
helpers/basic_auth/POP3 does not exist
cvs update -d -P
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
ons 2007-02-28 klockan 09:19 -0500 skrev Jeremy Hall:
Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
From my incomplete tests and experience:
Squid-3 is noticeably slower than Squid-2.6, but not by a huge amount.
Squid-3 is faster than Squid-2.5 in some workloads involving many
concurrent
Hi Henrik,
At 17.31 01/03/2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
But hopefully the forward porting of bug fixes from Squid-2 has helped.
At least it won't have most of the bugs fixed in Squid-2 since the two
code bases forked 4.5 years ago.. Many many thanks to Guido which has
done a great job in
-Original Message-
From: Guido Serassio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 5:51 AM
To: Henrik Nordstrom; Jeremy Hall
Cc: Squid Developers
Subject: Re: squid3 comments
I have always hoped than some other developer with a more strong C++
knowledge will try
-Original Message-
From: Guido Serassio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 2 March 2007 5:51 AM
To: Henrik Nordstrom; Jeremy Hall
Cc: Squid Developers
Subject: Re: squid3 comments
I have always hoped than some other developer with a more strong C++
knowledge will try to fix
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your answers. As I can understand you are talking about
the squid4 project. If you want an independent opinion, I believe that
it is not good idea to start striping the squid2.
You will get again the same mistakes done at squid3. For a such project
start from
Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
_J
Alex Rousskov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 5:04 PM
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
In the other hand I need a proxy with an icap client because I spent
time (and continue spending) to an icap related project. Squid3 has a
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:19 -0500, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Is squid3 faster or slower than squid2?
I will be doing performance tests with Squid3 shortly. Will post.
Alex.
Hi Alex,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
I agree that many Squid3 parts should be fixed, polished, or thrown
away. However, I think that we should focus on making Squid3 stable
first, and the performance/polishing work you are discussing should be
done for v3.1.
I am not
Tsantilas Christos wrote:
As an example of such changes I am attaching the rewritten
parseHttpRequest, prepareTransparentURL and prepareAcceleratedURL
Sorry to all
the code I send in previous mail will not compile. I am sending it
again. Needs some more testing to be sure that it is OK
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 20:48 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
As an example of such changes I am attaching the rewritten
parseHttpRequest, prepareTransparentURL and prepareAcceleratedURL
A second example: again In parseHttpRequest we have the HttpParser
struct which we are using it to parse
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:54 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
I think we should start from stating the goal of these changes in
Squid
3.0. If they are for performance improvement, I would suggest waiting
until v3.1 or until performance tests indicate that we must improve
Squid 3 performance
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 17:54 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
I think we should start from stating the goal of these changes in
Squid
3.0. If they are for performance improvement, I would suggest waiting
until v3.1 or until performance tests
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking in squid3 code last days. I read again Adrian's mails
in which he complained about squid3 speed, and cpu usage.
Looking in the code there are a number of code-pieces which can
improved. An example is the call of
Tsantilas Christos [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 6:27
AM
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
agree .
Yes, I'd like to do all of what you've suggested above but I'm going
to do it by
junking most of the client-side request/reply handling routines and
replacing them
with stuff written from
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Ok Adrian, I am watching the mailing list and I know what you want to
do. I believe too that some parts of squid needs redesign, if the
project wants to survive. Squid is an old and huge project. And you
must continue your work because you
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a production
environment, most shy away from that.
* noone's
Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 9:25 AM
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3
and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a production
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would you
recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
There's two parts.
One: Alex is working on improvements
Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/07 10:00 AM
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
I think we are on the same page for end-term goals, but what would
you
recommend I do for today? Squid-3 is still a moving target.
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
In the other hand I need a proxy with an icap client because I spent
time (and continue spending) to an icap related project. Squid3 has a
good icap client. The first problem someones can see in squid3 is that
there are some
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and when you ask questions about using it in a
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 23:00 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
So are you saying those of us that need icap need to just wait?
There's two parts.
One: Alex is working on improvements to the ICAP code in Squid-3 which
I hope will act as a kind of reference
Perhaps the storework branch will become a reference implementation to
speedup Squid3 when the time comes :-). I would prefer that folks spent
more energy on Squid 3.0 to make it stable faster (and only then
optimize Squid 3.1), but I am not going to call every project that is
not helping me
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 22:25 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Jeremy Hall wrote:
Let me second this. When you start asking questions about squid3 and
its stability, you get anything from it's stable to not for prime
time and
30 matches
Mail list logo
