On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Muthukumar wrote:
There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The performance of this is not known.
How many requests being generated by squid + poll() / squid + select() on 32 bit hardwares?
As I said there has not been any benchmarks of Squid-3 for a
Hi,
That is on a production server, not a Polygraph test. At busiest time: above 140
reqs/sec, using 8Mbit/s, average fds in use is between 3k-4k (50% is user-side and 50%
server-side), and CPU usage is about 12% on a P4 2.8Ghz, RAM=2GB (cache_mem 400MB),
and 95GB of cache_dir. cache_dir is
I've been using squid3 with epoll support for a couple of months.
In my case, squid with poll/select did consume up to 100% CPU. With epoll, CPU usage
dropped to less than 10%.
Long term average max CPU usage:
http://webs.uolsinectis.com.ar/garana/x/cpu.4.png
With epoll, CPU usage over the
Hello Henrik,
Thanks again.
Is there anyone benchmarked squid+epoll() on polygraph? How may I expect requests
satisfaction limit on Linux host
2.6.5-1.358 #1 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux platform?
There has not been any benchmark on Squid-3 + epoll in a long time. The performance
of
Hai Gonzalo,
I've been using squid3 with epoll support for a couple of months.
In my case, squid with poll/select did consume up to 100% CPU. With epoll, CPU
usage dropped to less than 10%.
It seems to be great. How many requests are being generated per second?
Are you using
