On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Paul Bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kinkie wrote:
A quick googling brought me to a VMWare virtual appliance at
http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/57.
I've recorded your suggestion on http://wiki.squid-cache.org/WishList.
Are you willing
Erk, HTML email, thats not even done right! *smacks your client* :)
Uhm, start by looking at the header logging feature (mime_${SOMETHING} in
squid.conf) to log
request and reply headers.
I'd then use those client requests to create test cases to feed to Squid.
Adrian
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008,
Hi Indunil :)
First of all, thanks a zillion for ur help before,
I was implemented ur suggested rules, and
its working, my squid box become transparent ;-)
Um, but there is some other problem disturbing
me here. Those rules working for a http traffic,
in fact, i have to redirect ftp traffic
Ive volunteered to setup one machine with 4 logins + content
filtering/time based ACL for the 2 children to replace ( and improve
on ) my sisters' dying winXP machine.
I want to use basic authentication ( less work for me and i think) and
none are particularly computer literate to mess
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008, Alex Rousskov wrote:
I think it actually is a bug in the Vary handling in Squid-3.
The condition:
if (!has_vary || !entry-mem_obj-vary_headers) {
if (vary) {
/* Oops... something odd is going on here.. */
.. needs to be looked at.
Hey everyone,
I am currently running Pound in the DMZ as the reverse proxy but squid as a
normal proxy. They are running on the same box and all that.
I just wanted to know if anyone here had any experience with both and could
recommend to move my pound setup to squid to simplify things?
G'day,
I'd start by grabbing tcpdump/ethereal/wireshark and sniffing the traffic
on the Squid-2.5 and Squid-2.6 servers. Remember to snapshot the entire
packet with tcpdump (-s 1518) if you want to use tcpdump to capture
a pcap file that you can then read in ethereal/wireshark on another box.
Dwyer, Simon wrote:
Hey everyone,
I am currently running Pound in the DMZ as the reverse proxy but squid as a
normal proxy. They are running on the same box and all that.
I just wanted to know if anyone here had any experience with both and could
recommend to move my pound setup to squid
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:07 -0600, Paul Bryson wrote:
I have been looking for some sort of easy to install Squid transparent
caching proxy. Something like KnoppMyth (http://mysettopbox.tv/) but
just for Squid. Boot to a CD that has you partition/format your
harddrives, installs the OS
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:28 -0400, saul waizer wrote:
Recompile squid with this option if you haven't done it so far
--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for
Add these lines to your squid.conf:
forwarded_for on
follow_x_forwarded_for allow all
No, this is a quite different thing. This makes
Just to summarise the discussion, both public and private.
* Squid-3 is receiving the bulk of the active core Squid developers' focus;
* Squid-2 won't be actively developed at the moment by anyone outside
of paid commercial work;
* I've been asked (and agreed at the moment) to not push any big
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 10:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
At the end of the day, I'd rather see something that an increasing number of
people
on the Internet will use and - I won't lie here - whatever creates a self
sustaining
project, both from community and financial perspectives.
I agree
The only reason I haven't upgraded beyond the current stable 2.6 code is that
some third part companies (like Secure Computing, who we use as a Squid plugin)
only supports certain versions of squid. I haven't even played with 3.0 because
of this. I think squid hands down is an amazing proxy
My 2c WRT 2 v 3 etc;
- We currently run commercial proxies and are looking to replace them with
squid boxes, however recent list discussion is making me a little nervous. I
would have used 2.6 for performance (need to support 10K users) and for
- Secure Computing's Smartfilter. It currently
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:04 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Annoyingly, why the hell is the request from the client a range request?
Squid can't easily cache those unless it somehow fetches the entire object
first.
FWIW -3 has about 60% of the work needed to cache fragments done. Whats
missing is a
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Rachmat Hidayat Al Anshar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Indunil :)
First of all, thanks a zillion for ur help before,
I was implemented ur suggested rules, and
its working, my squid box become transparent ;-)
Um, but there is some other problem
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 06:25 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008, Alex Rousskov wrote:
I think it actually is a bug in the Vary handling in Squid-3.
The condition:
if (!has_vary || !entry-mem_obj-vary_headers) {
if (vary) {
/* Oops...
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008, Nick Duda wrote:
The only reason I haven't upgraded beyond the current stable 2.6 code is that
some third part companies (like Secure Computing, who we use as a Squid
plugin) only supports certain versions of squid. I haven't even played with
3.0 because of this. I
Kinkie wrote:
This is not a code-writing activity; it's rather about having
experience in one specific usage scenario and being willing to to
share it with others.
Then I will add what I can to the wiki when I get a chance. That really
is the limit of my abilities.
Atamido
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
There is the CacheMARA product from MARA Systems. But it needs a bit of
updates to work with current hardware (and current Squids), and
additionally the free version isn't quite ready yet (my fault).
Looks like an interesting product. I've become a big fan of these
Kinly explain in more detail. I do not understand your response.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Abidoon Nadeem [EMAIL PROTECTED]; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:09 AM
Subject: Re:
Paul Bryson wrote:
So, I'm not going to be able to roll my own solution by myself, or
realistically even 10% of the work myself.
You might surprise yourself. I moved from Windows to Linux, and while much of
it is hard, especially on the desktop, squid is not hard.
I think the most
22 matches
Mail list logo
