Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Nick Fennell
Hey Amos. I was waiting for that! We have a few requirements not yet satisfied in Squid 3.x, storeurl_rewrite features are a big one, so we're having to hold off until we're able to conjure something up. Can't get them ported across can you? ;-) WIth regard to 2.7, ZPH, are you aware of any

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 8:41 p.m., Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote: Hi I have now enabled ipv6 3: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a6:07:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 160.85.104.14/24 brd 160.85.104.255 scope global

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 10:31 p.m., Nick Fennell wrote: Hey Amos. I was waiting for that! We have a few requirements not yet satisfied in Squid 3.x, storeurl_rewrite features are a big one, so we're having to hold off until we're able to conjure something up. Can't get them ported across can you? ;-)

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Sandrini Christian (xsnd)
That is what I guessed as well. But we can not control their DNS and the solution so far was not to check for records. It is silly for one domain but it is a quite important one that is used a lot. Not sure if there is any alternatives? I thought that squid 3.2 is doing parallel lookups

Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/12/2013 2:09 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: No. A bug report will not make any difference here. dns_v4_first is about the sorting the results found, not the lookup order. is faster than A in most networks, so we perform that lookup first in 3.1. This was altered in 3.2 to perform

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Try to contact the dns servers maintainer using postmaster or any other relevant address. You can consult about it in ISOC mailing list. BIND has very nice logging options about lazy and problematic dns servers which can help you prevent these issues. It's a very common problem in the dns

[squid-users] Is squi 3.3.1 stable released?

2013-02-12 Thread Amm
Hello, I am seeing squid 3.3.1 released on 9th Feb 2013, mentioned under Stable versions at: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/ Where it is also mentioned that: Current versions suitable for production use. But when I see release notes for 3.3.1, its written that: While this release is not

AW: [squid-users] AW: any chance to optimize squid3?

2013-02-12 Thread Fuhrmann, Marcel
Hello again, i found out, that this delay comes from squid_ldap_group and not from squid_kerb_auth. I thought it would be faster when I'm using Kerberos auth and ldap groupcheck: auth_param negotiate children 10 auth_param negotiate keep_alive on auth_param negotiate program

Re: [squid-users] Is squi 3.3.1 stable released?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 13/02/2013 12:05 a.m., Amm wrote: Hello, I am seeing squid 3.3.1 released on 9th Feb 2013, mentioned under Stable versions at: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/ Where it is also mentioned that: Current versions suitable for production use. But when I see release notes for 3.3.1, its

[squid-users] Squid 3.3x: UNLNK id(232) Error: no filename in shm buffer

2013-02-12 Thread David Touzeau
Dear I have these errors on Squid 3.3 What does it means ? 26988 UNLNK id(232) Error: no filename in shm buffer 26989 UNLNK id(547) Error: no filename in shm buffer 26988 UNLNK id(233) Error: no filename in shm buffer 26989 UNLNK id(548) Error: no filename in shm buffer 26988 UNLNK id(234)

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3x: UNLNK id(232) Error: no filename in shm buffer

2013-02-12 Thread TJM
Hello, I was going to ask for the same thing, I'm running 3.2 and I also see tons of these errors filling my cache.log. On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:29:07 +0100 David Touzeau da...@articatech.com wrote: Dear I have these errors on Squid 3.3 What does it means ? 26988 UNLNK id(232) Error: no

[squid-users] Squid 3.3.1 / Solaris 10

2013-02-12 Thread C. Pelissier
Hi, I've just tried Solaris 10 compilation of last squid 3.3.1. Here is my configure : CFLAGS=-std=c99 ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX --disable-strict-error-checking --localstatedir=/var/squid --with-pthreads --enable-default-err-language=French --enable-err-languages=French

Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid round-robin to 2 Apache's

2013-02-12 Thread PARAM KRISH
Hi, Just to update , it worked fine. The problem was with the redirect login cgi that had some permission issues in other server hence it did not failover earlier. It now listens only in 443, works beautifully. Thanks Amos for your help. On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:16 AM, paramkrish

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Nick Fennell
Hey Amos. I believe we're already testing the package provided by Eliezer and have encountered some issues with the current workings. I know we'll be in touch with him shortly to discuss. Hopefully it's something fixable but he'll know more when we do :) Thanks for the reply/info. Nick --

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Petter Abrahamsson
Christian, This sounds very similar to what I have seen with a few sites. My solution was to add the problematic domains to /etc/hosts (only ipv4 address) and restart squid. I'm not proud or happy about this solution but it does the trick for me. Kind regards, /petter On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at

[squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-12 Thread Scott Baker
I have a bunch of static content with appropriate Expires headers, but the URL contains a ?serial=123456 where the serial number is dynamic. Is squid smart enough to ignore the fact that the URL looks like a dynamic request, and use the expire headers to see that it's indeed static/cacheable

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Many admins will be happy to know about these domains. Admins should properly maintained and fix them or maybe get some help in finding the culprit for the problem. As I posted before the ISOC list is full of requests for help regarding similar problems and solutions for them else then the

Re: [squid-users] Caching URLs with a ? in them?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 13/02/2013 10:48 a.m., Scott Baker wrote: I have a bunch of static content with appropriate Expires headers, but the URL contains a ?serial=123456 where the serial number is dynamic. Is squid smart enough to ignore the fact that the URL looks like a dynamic request, It *is* a dynamic

Re: [squid-users] sharepoint pinning issue?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 13/02/2013 3:49 a.m., Alexandre Chappaz wrote: Hi, I know this is a subject that has been put on the table many times, but I wanted to share with you my experience with squid + sharepoint. Squid Cache: Version 3.2.7-20130211-r11781 I am having an issue with autehtication : when accessing

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3x: UNLNK id(232) Error: no filename in shm buffer

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 13/02/2013 1:29 a.m., David Touzeau wrote: Dear I have these errors on Squid 3.3 What does it means ? We recently added a number of messages similar to this one to report error codes coming out of the kernel which were previously ignored for no documented reason. This one appears to be

[squid-users] squid 3.3.1 - assertion failed with dstdom_regex with IP based URL

2013-02-12 Thread Amm
I had reported this bug earlier in Dec 2012 but probably went unnoticed in squid-dev group http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/201212/0099.html So just re-posting as it still exists in stable branch 3.3.1 Hello, I get following when using squid 3.3.1. 2013/02/13 08:57:33

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.1 / Solaris 10

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
For the record; please report these type of issues through bugzilla. On 13/02/2013 2:07 a.m., C. Pelissier wrote: Hi, I've just tried Solaris 10 compilation of last squid 3.3.1. Here is my configure : CFLAGS=-std=c99 ./configure --prefix=$PREFIX --disable-strict-error-checking