Got it. udp_incoming_address works fine with peer sibling. Tried with but
can't communicate with mcast_group.
I need to understand about this:
icp_port 127.0.0.1 and mcast_group is 224.0.0.1, the multicast cant
broadcast or icp_port cant receive?
Assuming config: proxy1
cache_peer 224.0.0.1
Hi,
I have some problems with the following site:
http://www.wasteservmalta.com/
the .NET framework from site give me an exception. Without squid I have
not problems.
Thanks for any help.
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Vianello [mailto:lviane...@ambientesc.it]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:18 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] problems with a site
Hi,
I have some problems with the following site:
http://www.wasteservmalta.com/
I'd like to
Hallo, Luigi,
Du meintest am 08.03.13:
I have some problems with the following site:
http://www.wasteservmalta.com/
the .NET framework from site give me an exception. Without squid I
have not problems.
Here: no problem.
Squid 3.2.3
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 08.03.13:
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the
availability of the Squid-3.3.2 release!
Compiling it on one of my machines stopped with
depbase=`echo peer_proxy_negotiate_auth.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/
|;s|\.o$||'`;\
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
No problem with Squid 2.7
So it looks like some special option of your squid creates your problem.
squid.conf to be posted here might give some indication.
And output of squid -v
--
View this message in context:
And...
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.HEAD/changesets/squid-3-12715.patch
PS. I've now ported these, they will be in the 3.3 daily which is
created in ~8 hrs.
Amos
Amos,
i tried squid-3.3.2-20130308-r12514 and it compiled just fine without
any errors. though i had to use '--disable-strict
Does anyone have a simple example configuration for running Squid
3.3.2 with multiple workers?
I've taken a peek at the wiki online and would just like a real-world
example to try.
Thanks In Advance,
--
Adam W. Dace
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 08.03.13:
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the
availability of the Squid-3.3.2 release!
Compiling it on one of my machines stopped with
depbase=`echo peer_proxy_negotiate_auth.o | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/
|;s|\.o$||'`;\
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
people need your help, I have a problem in configuring squid
transparent, after having compiled it enabling ssl support using the -
enable-ssl (ie https support), with the only goal to block facebook,
do not know but what happens when I try to configure an error occurs
that blocks all https
people need your help, I have a problem in configuring squid
transparent, after having compiled it enabling ssl support using the -
enable-ssl (ie https support), with the only goal to block facebook,
do not know but what happens when I try to configure an error occurs
that blocks all https
Le 07/03/2013 18:18, Noc Phibee Telecom a écrit :
Hi
I have a problem with my squid server. Squid works with authentication
NTLM, it works very, well to access a website that requires also a
authentication it creates problems.
If i create a ACL with http_allow, the user have:
401
After a bit of reading squid.conf.documented, I went ahead and tried
to make a unified SMP squid.conf configuration.
However, once I add the workers directive, I get the following error:
FATAL: Ipc::Mem::Segment::create failed to
shm_open(/squid-cache_mem.shm): (22) Invalid argument
Squid Cache
What i have is :
http://pastebin.com/dbXNEj5F
In production with 700 costumers and is working good so far. Using
squid-3.3.2-20130305-r12513
Regards
After a bit of reading squid.conf.documented, I went ahead and tried
to make a unified SMP squid.conf configuration.
However, once I add the
On 03/08/2013 08:11 AM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
Does anyone have a simple example configuration for running Squid
3.3.2 with multiple workers?
You can just add workers 2 to squid.conf.default.
Alex.
On 03/08/2013 01:14 PM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
However, once I add the workers directive, I get the following error:
FATAL: Ipc::Mem::Segment::create failed to
shm_open(/squid-cache_mem.shm): (22) Invalid argument
Squid Cache (Version 3.3.2): Terminated abnormally.
Is this a bug? Or am I
- Original Message -
From: Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2013 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.2 and SMP
On 03/08/2013 08:11 AM, Adam W. Dace wrote:
Does anyone have a simple example
hi Guys ,
@alex , you said that just add the workers in squid.conf ??
how many workers do i need ?
i think i have 24 cores with 2 main cpu , i think 12 of them are idle
beacuse 1 main cou is working !!!
i will print my cores in my server :
*[root@squid ahmd]# mpstat -P ALL
Linux 3.7.5 (squid)
hi ,
ive compiled squid 3.3.2 with the following :
Squid Cache: Version 3.3.2
configure options: '--enable-linux-netfilter' '--with-default-user=squid'
'--enable-wccpv2' '--enable-snmp' '--enable-cachemgr-hostname=localhost'
'--disable-ipv6' --enable-ltdl-convenience
but i
Good day,
If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
share to other process?
On 03/08/2013 07:40 PM, Amm wrote:
is it possible that both workers will occupy same CPU?
Yes, it is not uncommon for two processes to share a CPU core,
especially when processes do not do much. You can even use SMP Squid on
single-core machines (e.g., for robustness). For best performance, it
On 03/08/2013 08:30 PM, Ahmad wrote:
@alex , you said that just add the workers in squid.conf ??
Yes, adding workers 2 (or similar) to squid.conf will turn on SMP
features.
how many workers do i need?
It depends on many factors such as your hardware, core hyper-threading,
offered load, disk
On 03/08/2013 11:21 PM, jiluspo wrote:
If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
share to other process?
No. Ufs-based store modules, including aufs, are currently not
SMP-aware. If you use them in SMP Squid (without protecting them with
SMP conditionals), your cache will
- Original Message -
From: Alex Rousskov rouss...@measurement-factory.com
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org squid-users@squid-cache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2013 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.3.2 and SMP
On 03/08/2013 07:40 PM, Amm wrote:
Lets say I have
Therefore squid SMP is not stable. if we need to store more than 32KB the
best way is to use multi-instance and peering...I wish I could use multicast
in localhost.
When would probably finish the rock for large content?
I've tried in production squid3head SMP rock storage only and crashed with
25 matches
Mail list logo
