I just wanted to follow up on this conversation. Mike, earlier in the
thread you mentioned that there were jsp:include calls within your
layouts that also called layouts. That is a known problem that I'm working
on trying to solve before I release 1.5.7. I've made a lot of progress
since 1.5.6 so
With a layout, a parameter can consist of a large block of JSP.
Like, the page body, or a large fraction of it, or a dialog body, or
page navigation block. There can be any number of such parameters.
You can do that with a Java-coded tag but not a tag file, other than
the single body.
That said,
As far as I understood the example at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1296235/jsp-tricks-to-make-templating-easier/3257426#3257426,
you can actually do it:
%@tag description=User Page template pageEncoding=UTF-8%
%@taglib prefix=t tagdir=/WEB-INF/tags %
%@attribute name=userName required=true%
wow. Learn something every day :-)
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Moritz Petersen m...@moritzpetersen.de wrote:
As far as I understood the example at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1296235/jsp-tricks-to-make-templating-easier/3257426#3257426,
you can actually do it:
%@tag
Hi Moritz,
Your code looks right to me. What error are you getting?
Another way is to use a JSP .tag file:
/tags/address.jsp:
%@ tag body-content=scriptless %
%@ attribute name=address required=true rtexprvalue=true
type=com.example.model.Address %
%@ include file=/jsp/taglibs.jsp %
Since 1.5.4, using nested layouts has been somewhat problematic. My
site works in 1.5.3 but fails all over the place in any of the newer
releases.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Freddy Daoud xf2...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi Moritz,
Your code looks right to me. What error are you getting?
Ditto. We can't upgrade out of 1.5.3 :-/
(Can we please get the old layout code back as an option, please?)
/Janne
On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:38, Mike McNally wrote:
Since 1.5.4, using nested layouts has been somewhat problematic. My
site works in 1.5.3 but fails all over the place in any of
I pleaded during the whole process of changing that code for people to test
it, and I didn't get much of a response. It has been well over a year since
it was finally released. Have either of you reported your problems via
Jira? (I just did a quick check and couldn't find any.)
I have debated
No, sorry. The reason is that our layout is getting so complicated that I
cannot provide a simple test case for this, so the bug report would be pretty
much useless. It eez b0rken, no worky, plz fix isn't the kind of a bug
report I'd like to receive myself... :-)
/Janne
On 31 Jan 2012, at
Well I can see if I can work up a simple test case. My site isn't
super-complicated, I don't think. I just invoke layout-render inside
of layout-components in many places, sometimes more than two deep.
There are also a number of jsp:include calls inside of
layout-components, and some of those call
I should also add that according to a colleague things are a good deal
better in the not-yet-released post-1.5.6 code. I'll see if I can
determine exactly what it is that's not working.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ben Gunter bgun...@cpons.com wrote:
I pleaded during the whole process of
Hi Mike,
The only pattern I had to change during the transition to streaming
layout was stripes:layout-render inside fmt:bundle.
It was kind of making sense to me, so I corrected them and everything
works fine after that.
And my JSPs have the most patterns you mentioned except: 'invoke
Thank you everyone for the constructive replies. That JSP 2.0 tag files was a
good advice and it works perfectly well.
Actually, I wasn't getting a real error message, but just weird behavior. The
tag files solved my problem and are quite an elegant solution.
Regards,
Moritz
Am 31.01.2012
On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Mike McNally wrote:
Tags are great for a variety of things. Stripes layouts are (to me)
really like super tags. One of the main qualitative improvements
over tag files is that a layout component can be a whole bunch of JSP
(including, once and I hope again soon,
14 matches
Mail list logo
