Hi guys.
I downloaded the last nighty build of struts.
I would like to know which releases of external libraries are packaged with
it.
I already uses some libraries of jakarta commons and I would like to know
which one I need to upgrade.
After studying the manifest of jars I listed this :
-Message d'origine-
De : David Mulligan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 10 juillet 2002 14:09
À : 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: Struts dependencies
I'm wondering the same!
Would it be possible to name the jar files like so
commons-beanutils-1.4.jar
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10622.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks for bringing light to this Craig. I brought
this up awhile back and got no response. There has
been some discussion on the Users' list as well about
this. A couple of the people on the Users' list have
posted tools generated DTDs. I'll forward those
messages to the dev list and that
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---BeginMessage---
Hi all,
by the way last night I wrote down the DTDs for validation.xml
and validator-rules.xml
Hope it
Nightly builds of Struts are always compiled from the latest source code
in CVS -- both for Struts itself and for all of the commons-x
dependencies. There are definitely features and bugfixes in the commons
libraries that the current code in Struts depends on. The only exception
for Apache
craigmcc2002/07/10 10:32:58
Added: conf/share validation_1_1.dtd validator-rules_1_1.dtd
Log:
Initial checkin of DTDs for the two validator configuration files. They are
not yet referenced by the validator-rules.xml file, or the validation.xml file
of the example app -- want
While we're on the subject of DTDs I wanted to propose
that we rename the Tiles DTD from tiles-config.dtd to
tiles-config_1_1.dtd to be consistent. Now that Tiles
is in the core I think there should be a distinction
between versions of the DTDs. Already the Tiles DTD
has more than one
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Take those DTDs with a hefty grain of salt. I think it would be *FAR*
better to derive them by looking at the digester code and the associated
attribute sets. If it would be of help, I can do this by the end of
this week.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL
If it helps, I have a draft of some API documentation that I was getting
ready to review and release.
http://husted.com/scaffolding/validator-grammar.htm
Byrne, Steven wrote:
Take those DTDs with a hefty grain of salt. I think it would be *FAR*
better to derive them by looking at the
Steve,
That would be great. If you could just send in
patches or complete files to this list, I or another
committer can get them into CVS.
Thanks,
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Byrne, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take those DTDs with a hefty grain of
husted 2002/07/10 13:20:09
Modified:web/blank index.jsp
Log:
Update blank application for tiles, validator, et cetera.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +9 -24 jakarta-struts/web/blank/index.jsp
Index: index.jsp
husted 2002/07/10 13:20:17
jakarta-struts/web/blank/pages - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
husted 2002/07/10 13:21:03
Added: web/blank/pages Welcome.jsp
Log:
Update blank application for tiles, validator, et cetera.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-struts/web/blank/pages/Welcome.jsp
Index: Welcome.jsp
husted 2002/07/10 13:21:25
Modified:web/blank/WEB-INF web.xml struts-config.xml
Added: web/blank/WEB-INF validation.xml tiles-defs.xml
Log:
Update blank application for tiles, validator, et cetera.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +13 -23
husted 2002/07/10 13:23:10
jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/src - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
husted 2002/07/10 13:23:18
jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
husted 2002/07/10 13:23:29
Added: web/blank/WEB-INF/src build.xml
Log:
Update blank application for tiles, validator, et cetera.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/build.xml
Index: build.xml
husted 2002/07/10 13:23:36
jakarta-struts/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
husted 2002/07/10 13:23:49
Added: web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources application.properties
Log:
Update blank application for tiles, validator, et cetera.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
shame-faced
OK, OK, I just committed a fix based on this to eliminate having to set
the stupid dynamic attribute for DynaActionForm subclasses. It shoulda
never been there in the first place.
/shame-faced
Craig
On 10 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 10 Jul 2002 18:38:39 -
From:
Doing the fix for 7751, I ran into a case where the undo of the / adding
change caused the unit tests to fail, because I'd added some tests for the
new behavior. I've commented those tests out until we figure out what to
do about that particular situation.
I'd like to ask all Struts committers
This is great Craig, I can't believe it wasn't thought of earlier.
One quick question...(I'll probably try it later tonight anyway)...but:
does this mean I can do this...
form-bean name=logonForm
type=com.myform.that.extends.ActionForm
form-property
jholmes 2002/07/10 15:25:14
Modified:doc/resources tutorials.xml
Log:
added Oracle JDeveloper tutorial
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/tutorials.xml
Index: tutorials.xml
: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/doc/news.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- news.xml 9 Jul 2002 23:10:25 - 1.7
+++ news.xml 10 Jul 2002 22:28:42 - 1.8
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@
section name=News href=news
+h3a name=20020710
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:54:49 -0400
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7751] -
jholmes 2002/07/10 15:47:57
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
remove 7751
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +1 -2 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/STATUS,v
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10622.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9364.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9364.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10006.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi:
Are there any understandings about who marks Bugzilla bugs as
resolved? Earlier tonight, I marked #10006 as Resolved/Wontfix
because it refers to BeanUtils as a Struts component, and it is now a
commons component.
Is this kind of resolution something which is meant to be done only by
33 matches
Mail list logo
