Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I'm -1 on making Struts 1.2.x dependent on Servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2.
Ditto. Contrary to popular brief, a great number of organizations have
*not* migrated to 2.3/1.2, including some of the largest companies in
the world.
-Ted.
My original point really was that if the standard for Struts continues to be
2.2/1.1 that we should be careful not to reply to the How do I do this with
html:??? questions with the stock answer of use JSTL.
If we're supporting Struts tags then I believe we should first answer the
question that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22828.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Robert Leland wrote:
Shall we move to Validator 1.1.0, for 1.2.0 ?
If it makes it from Alpha to GA in time, and it's a drop-in replacement,
then it would be OK with me =:0)
Though, I'd like to get out at least one 1.2.x point release before
doing anything drastic, like migrating to Commons
Each of us can only offer support from our own experience. If a person
is not using the html taglib, then they might not know the html taglib
solution. But if they are using JSTL, they might know a JSTL solution.
There's no limit on the number of responses we can post to a question.
If someone
husted 2003/08/29 18:22:49
Modified:doc/news news_2002_q4.xml
Log:
Routine updates
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +106 -3jakarta-struts/doc/news/news_2002_q4.xml
Index: news_2002_q4.xml
===
RCS
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
OSS community needs your power! :-)
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
P.S. If *really* needed , see this below and follow:
# To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:50:45 +0800
(Subject: RE: Resource Bundle Prototyping)
Andrew Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stay
Dear Commiters,
Now Ja-Jakarta finished the translation of all message resource
bundles for Struts1.1 into Japanese and posted to Bugzilla again.
The resource bundle for struts-example that I had posted at March
was also updated.
#Unfortunately it isn't applied yet.
So, please apply the
Hello, Jakarta Struts Committers,
I reviewed these resource described below. They look good enough
to be put into CVS repository. They help us (Japanese) alot.
Thanks in advance.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:13:08 +0900
(Subject: [patch] New Japanese Message
husted 2003/08/29 19:45:34
Modified:doc status.xml
doc/news index.xml
Log:
Routine updates
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +40 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/status.xml
Index: status.xml
husted 2003/08/29 19:48:12
Modified:doc/news project.xml
Log:
Routine updates
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +4 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/news/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file:
rleland 2003/08/29 20:28:20
Modified:src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example
ApplicationResources_ja.properties
Added: src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example
AlternateApplicationResources_ja.properties
Log:
Bug 18255
rleland 2003/08/29 20:34:23
Added: src/share/org/apache/struts/action
ActionResources_ja.properties
LocalStrings_ja.properties
src/share/org/apache/struts/actions
LocalStrings_ja.properties
rleland 2003/08/29 20:40:56
Modified:src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator
ApplicationResources.properties
ApplicationResources_fr.properties
Added: src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator
rleland 2003/08/29 20:52:43
Modified:web/validator index.jsp jsRegistration.jsp jsType.jsp
multiRegistration1.jsp multiRegistration2.jsp
registration.jsp type.jsp
web/validator/WEB-INF validation.xml
Log:
Bug 18255
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/08/29 20:57:45
Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml
Log:
Document Resource additions
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml
Index: release-notes.xml
rleland 2003/08/29 21:07:42
Modified:doc volunteers.xml
Log:
Add names to contributer list.
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +385 -735 jakarta-struts/doc/volunteers.xml
Index: volunteers.xml
===
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/08/29 21:26:29
Added: src/tiles-documentation/org/apache/struts/webapp/tiles/dev1-1
ApplicationResources_ja.properties
Log:
Bug 18255 Provide Japanese resources updates for Struts
Patches submitted by Tetsuo Ajima, Tatsuo Takahashi, Satoshi
rleland 2003/08/29 21:26:55
Added: src/upload/org/apache/struts/webapp/upload
UploadResources_ja.properties
Log:
Bug 18255 Provide Japanese resources updates for Struts
Patches submitted by Tetsuo Ajima, Tatsuo Takahashi, Satoshi Hioki
Yoshinori
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/08/29 21:26:04
Added: src/exercise-taglib/org/apache/struts/webapp/exercise
ApplicationResources_ja.properties
Log:
Bug 18255 Provide Japanese resources updates for Struts
Patches submitted by Tetsuo Ajima, Tatsuo Takahashi, Satoshi Hioki
Regarding the required environment for using Struts: The servlet 2.3 spec is now 2
years old. There seem to be agreement, that it is still too early to switch to that
platform.
There also seem to be agreement, that the required platform for Struts 1.x should be
servlet 2.2/JSP1.1.
If the
Should Struts 2.x aim to be a portlet framework as well?
I think the goal is that Struts should be both a servlet and portlet
framework. So, yes, it would be a servlet/portlet framework. I'm not
interested in portlets myself, but I do support the goal, for different
reasons. I would like
All development discussions do happen on this list. If anyone following
the thread wants to reduce the discussions to another format, including
a Wiki page, they can. But I think most people are used to using the
DEV list.
I do try to get the broad stokes up onto the Roadmap page, whenever I
I haven't seen a patch for the tags (except for James, David and Aaron) in
quite a while because the response to maintaining/enhancing the tags is so
negative. Most of us who really use/customize the tags have gone our own
way already.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn
I would like to see those responses.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:08 PM
(Hey, maybe I should start answering the html taglib
questions with the
Velocity Tools solution!)
It's my feeling that Struts 1.x has to support 2.2/1.1, because that's
where a significant number of users still live.
But, it's also my feeling that the refactoring of the Request Processor
could open the door to being able to offer more than one front
controller for Struts 1.x.
The default
David Graham wrote:
IMO, Struts 2.x should attempt to get out of the taglib business
altogether. Until then, we should just let the tags be and maintain
Struts 1.x as Servlet 2.2 minimum requirement.
+1
And along the way, we can start distancing the core distribution from
the taglib
husted 2003/08/30 07:59:50
Modified:doc status.xml
doc/resources examples.xml extensions.xml taglibs.xml
tools.xml utilities.xml views.xml
Log:
Routine updates
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +8 -2
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote:
My original point really was that if the standard for Struts continues to be
2.2/1.1 that we should be careful not to reply to the How do I do this with
html:??? questions with the stock answer of use JSTL.
Point well taken -- I've been guilty of
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:35:38 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465]
Many Jakarta products have subproducts with their own CVS. Perhaps there
should be a Struts taglib CVS where all three packages could live.
-Ted.
+1
What about also doing this for the contrib components? Some of these are
really only concepts or proposals rather than production quality
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22576.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19944.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20994.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21624.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc2003/08/30 14:25:56
jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-chain/src/java/org/apache/struts/chain/legacy - New
directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
craigmcc2003/08/30 15:01:24
Added: contrib/struts-chain/src/java/org/apache/struts/chain/legacy
CatalogConfiguratorPlugIn.java
ComposableRequestProcessor.java
Log:
Add a ComposableRequestProcessor.java class contributed by Greg
Sorry for the late response on this ... it seems like weekends are the
only time I get to play with open source code any more :-(.
See interspersed comments below.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:28:53 -0500
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
48 matches
Mail list logo
