FWIW I'm with Martin on this. I don't understand the advantage having
separate repositories will give us. Even under one top lever repository
directory, we can organize the Struts product(s) however we like.
The only advantage I can see in having separate repositories would be to
make it easier
Option 1 works for me. Simplest thing that could possibly work. As
you've said, we can always change things around later.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 20, 2004 9:44 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: branching 1.2 and 1.3
Like most people, I imagine, I still haven't had time to do more than
give JSF a cursory glance. It's clear that there is some overlap between
JSF and Struts. However, that does not mean that one or other will
simply disappear.
Craig has previously stated that there is still a role for Struts to
All sound good with the following comments:
1. CVS integrates very nicely with my IDE right now (Eclipse/WSAD). I
don't know how well Subversion would integrate and I'd not want to move
if I lost that integration. I'm sure that also applies to other IDEs.
2. Bugzilla/Jira make no difference to
Yay, Struts!
Congratulations to everyone and special thanks to Martin for preparing
the proposal. Thanks also to Craig for agreeing to be the scapego..
err.. VP of the new project.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 7:21 PM
I've updated the remaining Java source files to the Apache 2.0 license.
I didn't manage to make Paul's patch work, but I did get the
ReplaceLicense tool to do most of the work.
There are a few things that need to be dealt with:
1. CVS headers
My updates (and Paul's patches) left the CVS headers
enthusiastic interest though!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Michael Albrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 8, 2004 9:42 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts Logo
Zitat von Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As a sideshow to the Struts TLP proposal, I'd like
+1 Struts TLP
+1 Craig for President in 2004. (Sorry, VP)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 6, 2004 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Following up on a brief thread on this list in
As a sideshow to the Struts TLP proposal, I'd like to resurrect a
discussion from a few months ago regarding a new logo for the Struts
project.
At the time, I put together a site
(http://www.ninsky.com/struts/logo/logo.do) to allow submission and
voting for a new logo, should we decide we want
:37 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts Logo
This might be the link Steve meant to post:
http://www.ninsky.com/struts/logo/entries.do
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:04:28 -0800, Steve Raeburn wrote:
As a sideshow to the Struts TLP proposal, I'd like to resurrect a
discussion from
I think I committed anything I had a while ago.
If Tim, or anyone else, want to submit patches, I'll gladly look them
over and check them in but, in the short term, I probably won't be doing
much myself since I've just started a new job. Once that settles down,
I'll get back to it.
Steve
Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I committed anything I had a while ago.
So the demo website that you posted should be able to generated
using the current build ? Also you mentioned that you had a script
to automatically move over the docs to xdocs. If so could
The Maven xdocs are not supposed to be maintained (yet). I only copied
them there originally to experiment with the Maven build process.
When we're happy with the Maven build, the documentation will be
automatically converted so there is no need to maintain both.
Steve
-Original
* @author Martin F N Cooper* @author Michael Westbay* @author
Mike
Schachter* @author Niall Pemberton * @author Oleg V
Alexeev* @author
Paul
Sundling* @author Ralph Schaer* @author Robert Leland* @author Rob
Leland*
@author Scott Carlson* @author Steve Raeburn* @author Ted Husted
Is that a proposal I hear? ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 6, 2003 10:00 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25267] - Mavenise cactus tests
On Sat, 7 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Subject: Cactus tests (Re: Maven test run)
On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote:
2. Run the Cactus tests
OK, since the TLDs are out of the way (Thanks Tim, Steve!), I got
started on this one this morning. I've gotten decently far along but
have to quit now. If anyone else
+1
(He has to do all the Maven stuff, right ;-))
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 7, 2003 6:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
Joe has been involved in the Struts community for
http://maven.apache.org/repository-upload.html
Perhaps, if Maven is widely adopted by Apache projects, it would make
sense to set up an Apache based repository. Then projects would be able
to directly publish their own jars.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL
Struts *does* support both the input and validation of dates in
international formats. See struts-validator.war in the Struts
distribution for an example.
I suspect you are defining a field on your ActionForm as type
java.util.Date and expecting Struts to correctly populate it. That is
not
Rick,
What DataSource are you trying to set-up? GenericDatSource in
struts-legacy.jar is independent of DBCP so you shouldn't need those
jars.
The following configuration works for me, even when I remove
commons-dbcp and commons-pooling jars from tomcat (4.1.29)
data-source
This question should really be addressed to the struts-user list.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert H. Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Disadvantages of Struts?
I just wonder if Struts comes with any
Thanks, Wendy. I spotted you'd done that after I posted :-)
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Disadvantages of Struts?
This question should really be addressed to the struts-user
You can reduce the range that is checked for changes using:
maven.changelog.range in project.properties
It's currently set to 180 days (~6 months)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 2, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject:
Thanks to Tim Joe for supplying patches. They made it nice and easy
for me to take that last step and get the tlds generated and into the
jar.
As far as I can tell, the struts jar is now being built correctly and
should be a drop-in replacement for the one generated by the Ant build.
Please feel
Tim,
Thanks for the patch. I took a look, and it will certainly help. There
are a few more things that need to be tackled before we're ready to
create the distribution with Maven.
1. Generate the TLD files ( docs)
2. Run the Cactus tests
3. Build the web apps
4. Migrate the documentation
of
time and energy by extending the default task versus having
to write the
whole thing from scratch.
Regarding generating the TLD files I'm not exactly sure
what u mean
by that. Do you mean like XDoclets generates TLDs?
-Tim
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Tim,
Thanks for the patch. I took
.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of
a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
I'll keep playing with this for now, because it's not fit
to be checked in
yet and I've only built the core /src/share files
At the minute, I've just copied the docs over to see how it would work
out. My opinion is not bad, but more work required. As far as I'm
concerned, the Maven build is still experimental and not ready for
primetime.
It might be an option to build the website from Maven in the (very) near
future,
I'm also getting a failure on TestActionConfigMatcher (using Ant build):
Name isn't correct
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Name isn't correct
at
org.apache.struts.config.TestActionConfigMatcher.testCheckSubstitutionsM
atch(TestActionConfigMatcher.java:202)
...
cfg.getName() is returning
Not in struts-documentation.war :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 27, 2003 11:40 PM
To: Struts-Dev
Subject: RE: Legacy APIs - Short Term Plan
eh?
Arent they in some kind of wierd xml format?
takes another look/
I've updated project.xml to reference the validator 1.1.1 jar. You need
to manually download it from http://www.apache.org/~rleland/ and place
it in your local repository.
.maven
plugins
repository
...
commons-validator -- you may need to create directories below here
jars
Me too!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 28, 2003 12:56 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Maven test run
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point, thanks for solving the mystery. I've updated
what you started here with the
current Maven build?
-Ted.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of
a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
I'll keep playing with this for now, because it's not fit
Ted,
As you're updating the web site, the ApacheCon logo can be removed now.
If you've already finished, I'll get it later on.
Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Most likely you haven't closed a JSP tag correctly. Try commenting out
sections of your JSP to narrow down where the error is.
But you should be asking on the struts-user list not here.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Abhijeet Mahalkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 13, 2003
The committers of the Struts project are entrusted by the Apache
Foundation to determine the content of the Struts portion of the
website. None of us has objected to Craig's update, probably because
we've all grown tired of Vic being a PITA. (Incidentally he's always a
PITA about non-technical,
No attachment came through. Your best best is to open a buzilla
enhancement request against the Nightly Build and attach your code
there.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 13, 2003 1:42 PM
To:
to help her, so much easier to
cross the street. Well for better or worse, I did not cross
the street!
.V
ps: ah support open source?
Steve Raeburn wrote:
The committers of the Struts project are entrusted by the Apache
Foundation to determine the content of the Struts portion
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Revusky
Sent: November 13, 2003 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or, really, to put it bluntly, I was not addressing you, Steve.
If you wanted a private conversation, you should have emailed Craig
directly.
+1
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 3, 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Vote]Disable bugs for Struts 1.0
I would like to propose disabling filing of NEW bugs for Struts 1.0,
I know BugZilla 2.16.3 can do this
I ran the tests today on 33 and 41 with a new checkout and everything
worked. Strange. I'll do it it again tomorrow to double check that I'm not
crazy.
(I'm on 1.4.2_01, W2K, Cactus 13-1.4.1, TC3.3a, TC4.1.27)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
failures that you guys are.
I've posted the full results at http://www.ninsky.com/struts/build/
If I can look at anything else, let me know.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 22, 2003 11:32 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 20, 2003 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgrading from 1.1 to Nightly Build
I upgraded from 1.1 to last night's build and discovered a whole bunch
of steps needed to upgrade.
I wrote an answer, but it got a bit long for this list, so I posted it on my
web site for Hien and anyone else who's interested.
http://www.ninsky.com/struts/eclipse.html
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Hien Q Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 16, 2003 7:50 PM
To: Struts
James' version uses 'Check out As...' rather than 'Check out as Project'.
That's probably better as you can set up the classpath and get the code
completion feature etc. working more easily. My notes don't cover that at
all so use his first.
And he has pretty pictures :-)
Steve
-Original
In the spirit of rolling up sleeves, this is the result of a very quick look
at Maven:
http://www.apache.org/~sraeburn/maven/index.html
I'll keep playing with this for now, because it's not fit to be checked in
yet and I've only built the core /src/share files. There's also more work to
do in
Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 2, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [Vote] Choosing a build/doc gen tool(s) [was: Re: The
Forrest Option]
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I'd like to add Maven now, learn from the experience on 1.x and then
use that to optimize
Maven: +1
Forrest: -0
Forrest plug-in: Possibly, but not yet.
I'm more interested in streamlining the build and I don't consider the
website production to be broken, so Forrest is not a big priority for me.
I'm not saying never, but I see Maven as more of a priority and would rather
wait and see
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 29, 2003 3:46 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: XHTML Web site updates
+1 as to the new sidebar approach. I'm quite pleased with the way all
this turned out.
I hope you'll also like the new
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 29, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: XHTML Web site updates
And now the downside to using tableless css webpages... Take a look at the
taglibs api pages in mozilla. The borders
I think there is currently an unresolved problem that's causing the tests to
fail.
See
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.orgmsgNo=21406
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gastin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 27, 2003 11:02 PM
To: Struts Developers
I think I'm coming at this from a different perspective than you :-)
The acid test for me is whether you could sensibly create a Struts app
without using the tags (just talking JSP here). While you can get by without
bean or logic tags, I still feel that many of the html tags are *necessary*
for
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 28, 2003 3:18 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Standard HTML Tags (was Extending Standard Tags ...)
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I still feel that many of the html tags are *necessary
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 28, 2003 1:51 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Standard HTML Tags (was Extending Standard Tags ...)
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still happy to be in the view business
See below.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Bubna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 28, 2003 8:30 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Standard HTML Tags (was Extending Standard Tags ...)
Agreed. It's almost unthinkable, but you can even develop an app without
Sorry, excuse the formatting on that last message. I hope this is more
readable.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 28, 2003 10:46 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Standard HTML Tags (was Extending Standard Tags ...)
See below
Many of the tags (basically those that have been implemented in struts-el)
are closely bound to Struts so I don't see that they belong anywhere else.
(Separate jar, yes. Separate cvs dir, probably). The remaining tags have a
limited shelf life, having been superseded by JSTL.
I'd also like to see
http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/i/IMHO.html
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gastin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 27, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Off topic
I keep seeing IMHO in many posts. What does IMHO mean?
Chris Gastin
, 2003 9:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extending Standard Tags was Editable Fields V/S Static Text
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Many of the tags (basically those that have been implemented in
struts-el)
are closely bound to Struts so I don't see that they belong
anywhere else
Sorry Rob, I meant to respond but got distracted after reading your message.
FWIW, a belated +1 :-)
BTW, why isn't Validator 1.1.0 available in the normal download location?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 27, 2003 7:59 PM
To:
Thanks Ted and everyone else for checking. Glad it all worked out.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 11, 2003 2:54 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: XHTML Web site updates
With an update to Ant 1.5.4, it now WORKSFORME
I'll take a look at this now. I'm sure it's nothing major.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 11, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: What happened to the taglib attribute listings?
If it's not something we can
-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 11, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: What happened to the taglib attribute listings?
I'll take a look at this now. I'm sure it's nothing major.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto
I've added back the contributors list, moving it to the left column, under
the menu.
For and example, see:
http://www.ninsky.com/struts/site/userGuide/preface.html
Enabling the list is controlled by an 'authors' attribute at both project
level, via the project.xml file, and for each document.
Thanks, I found it in the end but Ted beat me to updating the site :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 11, 2003 5:05 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: What happened to the taglib attribute listings?
Ted Husted wrote:
We now have an XHTML 1.0 Strict compliant, CSS based tableless layout web
site with only one XSL stylesheet to worry about (plus the taglib) and no
need for a separate printer friendly version of the User Guide.
I've added a validation task to the build file to ensure that the generated
documents
\jakarta-struts\doc\resources\projects.xml
I'll try it again tonight with a clean checkout, but wanted to bring
this up in case anyone experienced similar problems.
-Ted.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
We now have an XHTML 1.0 Strict compliant, CSS based tableless layout web
site with only one XSL
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
This seems more responsive than a periodic cleanup and we wouldn't have to
cache HttpSession objects which may not be safe/legal. Also, I think
placing the cleanup in the RequestProcessor guarantees that it is
Sorry, I'm getting my versions in a muddle. Here's the correct state:
Sun 1.4.2_01 - No problem
Sun 1.4.1_05 - Intermittent failures
Sun 1.4.1_02 - Intermittent failures
Sun 1.3.1- No problem
2 many twos and ones :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL
look and feel. I don't mind this personally, but
I do feel that we need to either retain the original layout or migrate
to Forrest or Maven. Something different is not what we are gong for
right now. =:0)
-Ted.
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Sorry, I'm getting my versions in a muddle. Here's
it again in debug...see if I can track
this thing down.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
678.910.8017
AIM:jmitchtx
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 8
Thanks, Craig. I hope that last patch will cure it for everyone regardless
of the JDK.
Steve
WORKSFORME on a just-downloaded CVS tree (19:40 Pacific Time), using JDK
1.4.2-b28 on Red Hat 9.0 Linux. The generated pages do indeed look very
much like the original style.
Craig
I noticed you used log.trace() instead of log.debug(). Would it be better to
stick with debug for consistency?
Steve
-Original Message-
...
dgraham 2003/09/10 21:27:21
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util
PropertyMessageResources.java
Log:
: September 5, 2003 10:43 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Struts web site [was: Re: Conversion of web site docs to XHTML]
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have committed the first step in transitioning the web site
documentation
to valid XHTML.
As far as I know we were planning to move
+1 for only having to use one tool
+1 for being able to customize LF
I guess that makes me +1 for Maven, but that's qualified by the fact that I
haven't used either so I don't know what bumps we'll hit down the road.
As long as we can produce valid XHTML and customize the LF I'll be happy.
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 5, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Conversion of web site docs to XHTML
Are you sure about this? Are you saying that
pulliblah/li/ul/p
is invalid?
David
I'm afraid so. p can
FYI, even looking back at HTML 4.0, p could only contain inline elements.
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/struct/text.html#edef-P
That's what I love about this job - you never stop finding out you've been
doing it all wrong :-)
Steve
You could add that suggestion to the bug report if you like.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Rick Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 2, 2003 11:21 AM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22878] New: - LookupDispatchAction throws
arriving.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 29, 2003 8:27 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465]
- Enhancement of the html:link tag)
-Original Message-
From
As I opened my big mouth on this topic, I'll also keep a special eye out for
any new bugs or patches that come in.
Tiles Nested tags seem to be popular areas for issues to occur though, and
I'm not particularly familiar with those.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan
2003, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:07:25 -0700
From: Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT] List problem - Long delays before some posts hit
You are right, JSTL doesn't completely remove the need for Struts specific
tags.
I think for the purposes of this discussion, the next generation would be
JSTL plus the struts-el taglib and when we talk about the Struts tags, we're
really talking about the traditional, non-el tags.
So keep using
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 29, 2003 6:08 PM
Each of us can only offer support from our own experience. If a person
is not using the html taglib, then they might not know the html taglib
solution. But if they are using JSTL, they might
My original point really was that if the standard for Struts continues to be
2.2/1.1 that we should be careful not to reply to the How do I do this with
html:??? questions with the stock answer of use JSTL.
If we're supporting Struts tags then I believe we should first answer the
question that
Many Jakarta products have subproducts with their own CVS. Perhaps there
should be a Struts taglib CVS where all three packages could live.
-Ted.
+1
What about also doing this for the contrib components? Some of these are
really only concepts or proposals rather than production quality
I'm not singling Vic out for this (honest) but...
The standard advice we are now giving everyone is use JSTL, which I
wholeheartedly agree with and have said myself. However, I think we need to
make sure that we still adequately support non-JSTL solutions and continue
to consider bug
Rick,
It certainly sounds interesting but I'd like to have a working example to
play with.
It would be nice if you could:
a. Create a small working example as a war and post in on a website for us
to take a look at.
b. Create an enhancement request in Bugzilla and add your proposed patches
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 15, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Flexible form support (was Re: Simplifying DynaActionForms)
...
One suggestion might be to add a standard parameter properties to
form-bean and
I thought the whole point was that there would be only one forward
and the action would always forward to that forward? In that case,
you could count on using the first one.
Just thinking that if an anonymous/default ActionForward were allowed, then
it could also be useful for other actions.
I haven't actually look at the code yet, but as I understand it, wildcards
are not even considered unless no other match is found. In which case you
would be getting an error page anyway.
So I don't think there's any performance impact... unless you're in a hurry
to see that error page :-)
Steve
I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name.
[ ] ParameterDispatchAction
[ ] MappingDispatchAction
[ ] ConfigDispatchAction
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 4, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Addition
actions
--- Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a general purpose action.
IMO, limited use inflexible actions don't belong in the Struts distro. We
should provide common actions to ease development but they should be
configurable to the user's needs.
It is intended to do
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 9, 2003 7:43 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
Are we going to take the struts-legacy out this build or remove
it for 1.3.
I'm for removing it. I can do this if no one
Yup. What Ted said. :-)
I'm still feeling my way here, but does this kind of change *need* a formal
vote?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 9, 2003 6:03 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 9, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)
If Action actually does something useful, could we go crazy and default
the
type as
Rob,
You added the .gif UML diagrams for the actions package a couple of months
ago. I'd like to add MappingDispatchAction. Is there a source image anywhere
that I can edit or do I need to edit the .gif itself?
Steve
-
To
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 9, 2003 8:57 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
That was my understanding as well -- we agreed to switch to the x.y.z
style that Apache HTTPD and Tomcat are using,
I believe that the original version of the EL tags was correct.
ScriptLanguage is a boolean property indicating whether to output the
'language' attribute for the focus script block. It's actually inherited
from FormTag.
It's a little confusing because ScriptLanguageExpr *is* a String value, but
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 10, 2003 12:37 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
I'm a zero-relative guy at heart :-). My only concern is that people will
assume 1.2.0 really means 1.2, but
Got it. Thanks. People keep adding stuff when I'm not looking :-)
Steve
Also edit the maven project.xml for developer entries.
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
