I'm not singling Vic out for this (honest) but... The standard advice we are now giving everyone is "use JSTL", which I wholeheartedly agree with and have said myself. However, I think we need to make sure that we still adequately support non-JSTL solutions and continue to consider bug fixes/enhancements to Struts tags EVEN where it would duplicate JSTL functionality because Struts still supports JSP 1.1/Servlet2.2.
I haven't considered whether this particular enhancement would fall into the category of something we should do, it just prompted me to raise the issue. If we've reached the stage where the recommendations we are making *require* JSTL, then I think it's time to be honest about the required platform for Struts and up it to 1.1/2.3 Thoughts? Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 27, 2003 8:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465] - Enhancement of the html:link tag > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21465>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21465 > > Enhancement of the html:link tag > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------- > Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |WONTFIX > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2003-08-28 03:27 ------- > You can/should use JSTL instead. > .V > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
