Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I think the basic Struts download needs at least an initial walkthrough on
all of the technologies it provides. Much a I'd love to be lazy and rely
on the incredible amount of effort others have put into this :-), we can't
just have nothing.
I could do an
I started a Core Technologies page that we could insert before the
Introduction as Chapter zero.
These gives a brief description of each of our enabling technologies and
links elsewhere for more detail.
If we wanted to add more detail later, it would be easy to expand on
this page.
+1 for me
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in 1.1, and improve the
existing documentation, with a goal to release a beta 2 of Strust 1.1 in
the near future (ideally by July 8 or so). Part of my motivation for the
timing is that Sun is shutting
+1 and more than happy to help with bugs and docs.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in
1.1, and improve the
existing documentation, with a goal to release a
beta 2 of
+1 on Beta 2 soon (although my company isn't shutting down next week :).
+1 also on reviewing the tags. I fixed one or two of these a while ago -
they showed up after I started using Resin 2.x - but there are likely more
that I didn't stumble across. A systematic review would be good.
Related
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
+1 on Beta 2 soon (although my
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Are the other committers interested in working towards such a goal?
+1, I'll try to finish up the UML for classes.
and put in place holders for the added package descriptions.
Plus pitch in else where.
-Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700
From
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
-Original Message
For the docs, do you think it might be useful to add a new 1.1 section
and march through the new features there, rather than patch the 1.0
docs?
A 1.1 section might be easier to create, since we won't have to worry
about segues, and will do double-duty as an upgraders guide. Of course,
we could
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700
From: Martin
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:44:48 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
For the docs, do
See intermixed.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:39:04 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
-Original
If the tag implementation (not including release()) modifies the values of
properties, then yes, we're in big trouble. This is the case I've come
across before.
I thought we had caught all of those, but want to make very sure.
For example, if the second use of a tag sets the same
Meanwhile, I've set up a diff section in the release notes with
pointers to every thing with 1.1 features or deprecations, that could
then be used to help create the 1.1 doc section.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/release-notes.html#diff
AFAIK, the JavaDocs are all
On 27 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: 27 Jun 2002 14:33:11 +1000
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
Meanwhile, I've set up a diff section
16 matches
Mail list logo
