One thing we do give up (I think) is the implicit nesting of form field
names (specified in the property attribute) inside the variable name of
the form bean itself. I guess the same is true of the with-like
facilities of the entire nested tag library.
It will be interesting to see if we
craigmcc2002/08/03 10:45:47
Modified:doc/stylesheets userGuide.xsl
Log:
Take advantage of XSLT's sorting ability to ensure that attribute lists and
tag lists are always documented in alphabetical order. Thanks for the
patch!
PR: 11435
Submitted by: Steve Byrne sbb at
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4 Aug 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: 04 Aug 2002 03:39:32 +1000
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts-EL: Ideas about name and indexed name attributes?
One thing we do
This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask. In Struts, we
generate the tld files from our own XML format, which is actually quite
close to a tld itself. Is there any chance that JSP 2.0 might add enough to
the tld format so that we wouldn't need our own format? Then we wouldn't
need a
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 10:53:12 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/stylesheets userGuide.xsl
Bugzilla #11330 points out that the 'name' and 'type' attributes on the
html:form tag no longer work. I've been looking at this, and a couple of
issues came up. In particular, these two values are no longer sufficient to
locate/create any potential form bean - particularly dynamic form beans.
craigmcc2002/08/03 11:20:04
Modified:doc/stylesheets userGuide.xsl
doc/userGuide struts-bean.xml
Log:
Enhance the stylesheet producing tag library documentation to recognize a
default element that describes the default value if an attribute is not
specified. Go
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:17:12 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The 'name' and 'type' attributes on the html:form tag
Bugzilla #11330
craigmcc2002/08/03 11:43:40
Modified:doc/stylesheets userGuide.xsl
doc/userGuide struts-html.xml struts-logic.xml
Log:
The stylesheets for tag library documentation now support since and
deprecated at both the tag level and the attribute level. The body content
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: The 'name' and 'type' attributes on the html:form tag
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11302.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin,
While you are messing around with FormTag, you might want to swat 11387 at
the same time. It's part of our cleanup of tags to make them work right
in a tag instance recycling container.
Craig
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:48:43 -0700
From:
craigmcc2002/08/03 12:00:57
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Update current status.
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +2 -3 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file:
Yep, I saw that one, and will take care of it.
--
Martin Cooper
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: The 'name' and 'type' attributes on the html:form tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10761.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11382.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc2002/08/03 13:54:54
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions DispatchAction.java
Log:
If the method called by DispatchAction throws an exception, unwrap it from
the returned InvocationTargetException and rethrow it. That way, the 1.1
exception handling machinery
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10217.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello, all:
I've finally gotten around to putting together a summary of activity on
the struts-dev list in July. I haven't been able to monitor the list as
closely this month, so please point out any important topics which I've
overlooked.
I think Rob was hoping to post the newsletter this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10388.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc2002/08/03 16:53:45
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic IterateTag.java
Log:
Improve the performance of iterating over an array of objects, by avoiding the
need to copy the array into a list. Unfortunately, that still doesn't help
for arrays of primitives
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11394.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9443.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9461.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc2002/08/03 17:33:04
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions DispatchAction.java
Log:
Equip DispatchAction with a new method -- unspecified() -- that is called
if the request does not include a value for the request parameter used to
select the method to be
29 matches
Mail list logo
