RE: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines

2001-03-19 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
-Original Message- From: Michael Hackett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: March 19, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a mild preference for "TextX"

RE: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines

2001-03-19 Thread Michael Hackett
From: Colin Sampaleanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you sure you don't mean that the usual convention for JUnit is to use 'Test' as a suffix? If you look at the documentation on junit.org, a number of examples use 'Test' as a suffix on the classname. [...] Well, what do you know! I guess I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines

2001-03-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: I think we need to give some guidelines for anyone who would like to participate in writing unit tests for Struts. I'd like to start this process by giving you my views on the subject and discuss it. When we have a final agreement, we can put a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines

2001-03-18 Thread Martin Cooper
Please see comments inline. - Original Message - From: "Vincent Massol" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 11:51 PM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Struts Unit Test Guidelines I think we need to give some guidelines for anyone who would like to p