As far as the problem goes concerning setting against valid indices,
my code does that simply enough using a check against ArrayList.size()
and the index from the request parameter - if the size is too small, I
just add new objects - 3 lines of code. This is all in a for loop,
which
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:14:13 +1000
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nested Tags question
I know JSP will automatically
am 13.06.2002,
08:22:43:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:14:13 +1000
From: Arron Bates
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Nested Tags question
I know JSP will automatically save parameters
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:43:59 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Nested Tags question
So Craig,
does the process work
PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Re: Nested Tags question
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:43:59 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Adam,
Back to the old want lists, but no session objects issue. It's a
common problem these days. It's hard to get the list model working
nicely without knowing how big the list is going to be so that objects
can be set against valid indexes.
The post you speek of in the archives is that
Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Re: Nested Tags question
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:43:59 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
Hi there,
I'll take a look at it this weekend. I don't get your reference to no
session objects.
As far as the problem goes concerning setting against valid indices, my
code does that simply enough using a check against ArrayList.size() and
the index from the request parameter - if the size
Hi folks,
I'm going nuts having a very unproductive day here trying to save
these nested tags as I mentioned earlier. I've boiled down my ignorance
so to speak to the following question:
How or why is the following input tag name / http request param:
monkeyTeamAlpha.monkeyWorkers[0].salary
Adam,
Should say that the monkey example's not the mos simple example. It's
more of a what's possible than a learners tool.
I just posted the link to the tute's and primer. The Tute's walk through
from a plain, non-nested bean, to the initial nesting, to the lists, and
lists within lists...
Hi Down Under,
thanks for the reply. I figured that the form properties setting thing
must be struts, after checking out the JSP spec. JSP does do a certain
amount of it though, since you can specify a tag in your jsp and say
parameters=* - and JSP will match any parameters in the request to
You should be able to do that. In-fact, that's one of the ways to re-use
common page presentations. If you do your job write, then your main page is
composed of a bunch of includes to render different parts of the result
"tree". Be-careful, however, the last time I checked the nested tags only
The nested tags as of probably a month and a half ago, the nested tags
penetrate dynamic includes.
I tried to mail the few (but vocal :) people that were throwing things
at me to get it done, you may have been the one that got away. Apologies.
Putting up a tutorial on my site tonight to show the
13 matches
Mail list logo