[cc += dfarning, alsroot, syst...@]
El Wed, 14-10-2009 a las 17:47 -0700, Josh Williams escribió:
I've made some bug fixes to the new ASLO design, I've tested it lightly
and it seems to work in all major browsers (even ie6). If you have a few
moments, please test it out (download/upload
Thanks for that Sayamindu, very informative
I hadn't known about the bookreader list, I signed up.
We are leaning towards an e-reader spotlight for the Sugar on a Stick
Blueberry launch and this info will help us in that reflection.
Sean
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:42:15AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += dfarning, alsroot, syst...@]
El Wed, 14-10-2009 a las 17:47 -0700, Josh Williams escribió:
I've made some bug fixes to the new ASLO design, I've tested it lightly
and it seems to work in all major browsers (even
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:34:50AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:42:15AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
All links to activity bundles appear to be broken :-(
For example:
I've just tried an equivalent of this patch on OLPC build 802 on an
XO-1, and it feels much more responsive. It affects all mouse-over
menus in Sugar. I'm adding it to my list of patches that improve
performance perceptions.
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/graphics/
--
James Cameron
El Tue, 13-10-2009 a las 20:47 +0100, Thomas Leonard escribió:
How about getting together on IRC to exchange ideas regarding packaging
strategies? I'd propose next Saturday @ 1500UTC [2], of course
negotiable.
Sounds like a good idea. Having a repository for Sugar-related apps
makes
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:58:12AM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
It makes all menus that currently have a delay appear instantly?
No, it doesn't. Try it. I think you'll like it.
It is quite easy to run the cursor over the activity ring ... nothing
appears until you stop for long enough. But
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:34:50AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:42:15AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += dfarning, alsroot, syst...@]
El Wed, 14-10-2009 a las 17:47 -0700, Josh Williams escribió:
I've made some bug fixes to the new ASLO design, I've tested
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
I know I myself hacked the image-builder script into this direction,
but in hindsight I feel that it got too hacky and that was the wrong
approach. It presented various surprises along the way and at the very
end left me with
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Zero Install appears to have identified reasonable compromises for many
of these trade-offs. While I'm not yet claiming that z-i would be a
(Keeping it in the Sugar side... )
I think it's a very good idea to look into
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:33, Daniel Castelo
dcastelo.sugarl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am testing the client gnome-ppp to connect the Xo with a modem 3G. When I
execute the client using consolehelper and pam (or the root user) the
application looks without the sugar theme. When I execute the
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:49, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Tomeu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:57, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Tomeu wrote:
I'm more concerned about developers proposing big user experience
changes because they feel it's better.
Yay, more
Hi,
I have posted an initial schedule for the Sugar Camp at Bolzano after
feedback from Walter, Sebastian, Tomeu, Aleksey and the Zeitgeist
people. Please let me know, if you have things you want to present that
are not yet part of the schedule or have any concerns or things I have
overseen.
I take two points from this exchange:
#1 User interaction changes are always subjective. Patches, requests,
suggestions, etc. should not be submitted with duh as a rationale. They
should be backed up with a clear rationale; better yet, hard data.
#2 The Sugar UI is not sacred. There needs to
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 14:47, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
I take two points from this exchange:
#1 User interaction changes are always subjective. Patches, requests,
suggestions, etc. should not be submitted with duh as a rationale. They
should be backed up with a clear rationale;
Tomeu,
If you insist on thinking that I have something against you, then I
will stop having this discussion with you.
I insist only on the reasonableness of taking you literally at your word.
Naturally, I'm quite certain that you have nothing against me that you
don't also have against
yes, what is you exec overview/
why are you proposing to discard .xo bundling?
or is this an option?
With the XO 1.5 including a gnome desktop
and just for development purposes,
and environmental running environments
having a broader base
(read multi linux distro and even aspartamine)
and multi
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM, DancesWithCars danceswithc...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, what is you exec overview/
why are you proposing to discard .xo bundling?
or is this an option?
I don't think that we're discussing discarding .xo bundling. I think we're
discussing augmenting .xo
Thank everyone :-). If a demo version is required - you can download
it from http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/GetBooks-1.xo
Thanks,
Sayamindu
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Samuel Klein s...@laptop.org wrote:
Ditto :)
I will be showing off Sayamindu's new work at the Making Books
Apparent
El Thu, 15-10-2009 a las 10:32 +0200, Martin Langhoff escribió:
I think it's a very good idea to look into a userdir-centric packaging
system such as z-i. There are of course a few other alternatives, and
very well considered critiques of these systems (from OS-centric
packagers usually ;-) )
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Honestly? I think the most interesting feature of Zero Install is that
it has an active development community working to solve the same hard
problems that we are facing with our XO bundles.
Ok - that's good. I am
I'll try to document how mirror brain is setup and how it affects
other systems in the wiki this afternoon.
Changes to devel, testing, or product activities.sl.o should not
affect one another. They are three separate instances consisting of:
1. Separate code trees.
2. Separate database
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 19:13, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
2. Sugar .86 starts to hit the street and the updater starts
automatically pinging a.sl.o for updates.
Yeah, this could have become a big problem.
Thanks,
Tomeu
--
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving
We will have the first meeting of the newly elected 2009-2010 Sugar
Labs oversight board at 14:30 UTC (10:30 EST) on Friday, Oct. 15, on
irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting
Among the agenda items are: (1) to sing the praises of our outgoing
board members; (2) to make sure that important board
El Thu, 15-10-2009 a las 07:34 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
We just tried to utilize AMO feature when it lets user download
public .xos from mirror sources and from files/ for other cases.
Recently all .xo were downloaded from files/(even after creating symlink
in /upload to files/).. and it
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Honestly? I think the most interesting feature of Zero Install is that
it has an active development community working to solve the same
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1
http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS8
This release includes a fix for the black box in Gnome, an updated repository
definition, and replaces Firefox with Midori.
If you still want to use Firefox you can always install it by doing a yum
install
The Journal Icon in an activity should open the dialog box for feedback.
The Stop Icon should not.
Resume by default should happen if the activity is already open.
Start new should be the default if there is no instance of that activity
already open. It was very confusing and distracting to have
Tomeu wrote:
I'm more concerned about developers proposing big user experience
changes because they feel it's better. Before I look at the patch I
would like to know if there's agreement from people close to our users
that this behavior change is desired. How can we get that?
How about users
Perhaps. What would you define as the ailment, yourself? The primary
intent was to encourage use of a direct interaction model, in which
palettes we're supposed to play a big role. When it turned out that
young kids, who didn't read, and who didn't have motor skills for
selecting form
I doubt this is a SoaS only problem but I haven't tested it on an XO
Tickets - 1055, 1503
1503 is a total blocker for using Memorize and 1055 is going to give me hell
in the field trying to get kids not clear that inviting face.
Maybe revert a.sl.o to a previous version?
I'm going in to work
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Avi fiendi...@gmail.com wrote:
Tomeu wrote:
I'm more concerned about developers proposing big user experience
changes because they feel it's better. Before I look at the patch I
would like to know if there's agreement from people close to our users
that this
2009/10/15 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
Would be interesting to know more on concrete issues (that lead to the
feeling part :-) ).
I guess the turning point in my thinking was when I realised that I
had to update the .contents file inside the image after making
non-activity
2009/10/15 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org:
No, it doesn't. Try it. I think you'll like it.
It is quite easy to run the cursor over the activity ring ... nothing
appears until you stop for long enough. But what does appear appears
without a two second delay!
OK then, that sounds a lot
El Fri, 16-10-2009 a las 09:44 +0545, Daniel Drake escribió:
OK then, that sounds a lot better. I'm surprised that this point
wasn't raised earlier.
Given that this thread is largely about process, let me throw in one
more point then: all patches should be accompanied with a good
35 matches
Mail list logo
