Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-16 Thread S Page
Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire Sugar community (not just the OLPC portion of it). Then

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-16 Thread Gary C Martin
On 10 Feb 2009, at 00:29, S Page wrote: Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire Sugar community (not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:29, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Samuel Klein
Can someone create a project hosting page for new projects on the sl wiki? On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:29, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: Then http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Project_hosting is obsolete. What's the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: I like that part. Are there criteria for removing someone's project if it's deemed inappropriate? Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Samuel Klein
Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of the two mentioned so far in this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-01-14 Thread S Page
Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: Today I went through dev.laptop.org/git http://dev.laptop.org/git identifying those projects that contain Sugar activities. http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/ActivityStatus Still remaining is to go through Activities/All (and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-01-14 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:05 AM, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: I'm not sure what you're doing, but if you want activities... When the call went out for activities for 9.1.0 I put all the meta-lists of activities in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0#Lists_of_possible_candidate_activities

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-01-14 Thread Gabriel Eirea
Wade: I'm an activity developer with my code at dev.laptop.org. I'm a bit confused about this migration. Is it necessary to change the location for some reason? Is dev.laptop.org going to be killed? I believe the Activity Team is a wonderful idea but would like to have this point clarified.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-01-13 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hi Wade Thanks to you..there are too many people excited about the activity team. i'll keep helping :). the work is indeed massive! Rafael Ortiz On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: Awesome, thank you Rafael! Today I went through dev.laptop.org/git