Hi all,
here's the next snapshot on our way to SoaS v2 Blueberry. This one fixes
some issues and introduces new features, namely:
* the updated FoodForce2, Slideruler and SocialCalc activities
* the gtk-recordmydesktop tool - execute it from the terminal
* new sample content - Alice's
Art Hunkins wrote:
Please do include csound-python. I'd like my new activities to work right
out of the box.
On a side-note, we've already included it in the latest SoaS snapshots,
so it'll make it's way into the Blueberry release.
--Sebastian
Hopefully, doing so will also encourage others
The file /etc/fedora-release might be where you want to look...
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
I can't seem to find either the lsb_release command, or a file by that name.
Typing lsb_release in the Terminal gives me file not found.
Find doesn't locate the file either, nor does a listing of
Hi everybody,
after considering input from the various teams involved in Sugar Labs
and the Sugar on a Stick creation, we're shifting the SoaS as followed.
2009-11-17 Fedora 12 Final Release
in the time between: wiki documentation must be readied!
2009-11-29 Image Gold Master Creation
Sorry for the late reply... I'm quite behind my e-mail. :/
Just add --nogpg to your yum call, and it should work for now. We're
looking to get this generally to work in Blueberry.
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
I'd really appreciate a response about this.
On sticks make with snapshots
Jim Simmons wrote:
Aleksey,
It would be helpful to have a way to distribute things like the
gstreamer espeak plugin you wrote. Fedora doesn't currently include
it. It would be even better if you could distribute versions that
work on the XO running .82, as well as versions for current
Sean DALY wrote:
I did manage to generate the .img and .crc files with the
live-iso-t-xo.sh script, but after successful nand-copy of
soas05xo.img the XO-1 does not boot, freezes at avatar with no dots
:-(
Sorry for the late reply. I was a bit busy with writing docs and fixing
bugs over the
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
adjustments. It's currently only available as a general .iso build,
others will
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
Sean DALY wrote:
that's the thing, there are no .img and .crc files for soas05xo that I can
find?
True, actually (sorry for the confusion). There are currently some
issues with the image creation for the XO, which just need to be worked
around (no big deal, really not) - we just need to get
Carlo Falciola wrote:
Hi,
I think that customization support is going to be an key point for Sugar/SOAS
deployement efforts and for nanaging relationship with field structures. So
I'm trying to start an effort in order to write down in as much as possible
detail all the potentially
Hi all,
this is a very quick update on the current state of SoaS v2.
We discovered on Tuesday that we wouldn't be able to ship content due to
legal concerns that was originally intended to be included and discussed
how to proceed in the last two days. Specifically, we won't include
anything
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
Confirmed that Read v78 has a jumpy cursor issue which can be
avoided by reverting back to v77.
Can't reproduce crash yet (trying to get hold of a F12 based system).
I can reproduce it using v77, too. The log is here: pastebin.be/22280
--Sebastian
-sdg-
On Thu,
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
Confirmed that Read v78 has a jumpy cursor issue which can be
avoided by reverting back to v77.
Can't reproduce crash yet (trying to get hold of a F12 based system).
I can reproduce it using v77, too. The log is here: pastebin.be/22280
Sean DALY wrote:
My call is we leave them out and concentrate on the wiki page.
(http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/ebooks). We can't keep
slipping the master as I'm sure you'll agree Sebastian :-)
+1 - to both! :) That's really reasonable.
Ideally, the default Browse homepage
Hi everybody,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this will change
in the
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi everybody,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though
Hi all,
you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora
packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true.
What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all
kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which
will get a Sugar environment with
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this
Walter Bender wrote:
What channel? #fedora-edu? #sugar-meeting?
Oh, right! I'd say let's just go for #fedora-olpc for now...
See you there!
--Sebastian
-walter
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi all,
you've probably heard the rumor, that
This is it. First meeting after some time, quite some folks joined.
Thanks to all those who dropped by! Here are the minutes and logs:
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.minutes.20091231_1013.html
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.log.20091231_1013.html
Next
Hi Wade,
thanks a lot for sharing your concerns that openly! I've dropped a few
comments inline...
Wade Brainerd wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
I'm concerned that you guys are planning to require activity authors
to package their activities in Fedora, in order to see them shipped in
SoaS. Is this
Hi all,
thanks everybody for attending! It was a great with cool questions and
discussions. We're currently readying the logs, notes and docs which Mel
logged in a GIT repo. So if you're interested in a practical step by
step guide, looking at the repository would already be a good start.
The
Please join us in #sugar-meeting tomorrow - directly after the SLOBs
meeting (so around 1600 UTC) - for a SoaS meeting. Topic will obviously
be the future of SoaS for v3.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.12.2009, at 00:57, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.12.2009, at 00:22, James Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
The changes look okay, though I'd just remove the read-only check,
that should make it work on both Mac OS
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors
Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
James Cameron wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:13:40PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
Briefly, how do I swing across to this on an OLPC XO-1.5 that is
installed with an OLPC F11 build? (There are several problems I'm
investigating where
Hi all,
I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
as well as the activity wiki page [2]. Recently, TamTam has been posted
for review, too. I'm a little disappointed with the speed we're
progressing with.
Here's a list of the currently most important things we need
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like
Tim McNamara wrote:
On 13 February 2010 09:15, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
mailto:sebast...@when.com wrote:
If nobody complains by the end of this weekend, I'll just upload the
images, put a GPLv2+ license in the archive and make a tarball, as this
is what they've been
I've a conflict coming up for the next weeks with our current meeting
time and would need to start something like half an hour later.
If you're interested in attending, please take a second to put down when
you're available here: http://whenisgood.net/fedora-sugar-mtg-1
Make sure to select
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 12.02.2010, at 12:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617
This should also depend on #520294.
- Bert -
Cool! Wasn't aware
James Cameron wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some
activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.
I've recently submitted patches to bugs.sugarlabs.org for two activities
because we
Daniel Drake wrote:
On 22 February 2010 03:13, Tomeu Vizosoto...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
You may want to ask in the soas ml, but in 0.88 we are going to make
it easier to users to change the default font size, so apps shouldn't
make any assumptions based on a fixed value for that.
But, in
Art Hunkins wrote:
Can we be certain that csound-python is included, please?
Art Hunkins
This is SoaS related, I'd say (and not for Sugar itself).
As stated in a previous e-mail, I've pushed an appropriate commit
earlier [1]. If you want to make sure, you can check the current
kickstart
Art Hunkins wrote:
It would be most helpful to me to know whether SoaS v3 will be called
Cloudberry or something else.
This was the original plan, as far as I'm aware. However, the final
release name will be determined through consideration of the various
involved teams, such as the Marketing
Art Hunkins wrote:
I am unable to test my activities (Our Music, Our Music MC) on recent daily
builds because Browse doesn't work, and other USB drives are not recognized.
(The neighborhood view shows nothing except me.) These are my only ready
ways of getting activities into the system.
SoaS engineering just proposed a major change-in-direction for the
upcoming (Mirabelle) release. See
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2010-March/000906.html and
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2010-March/002727.html for
more information - the short version is that instead
Hi all,
as you may have noticed, there are a couple of changes coming to Sugar
on a Stick to keep the whole project sustainable. In the upcoming month,
from March 28 (I'll be off starting Sunday night) to May 7, my ability
to devote time to the project will cease. I have to prepare for my
Hi folks,
I have been busy lately and will continue to be for the next couple of
weeks. However, summer possibility exploration happens, too. So. Here's
a GSoC proposal. Comments appreciated! :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/Improved_Sugar_on_a_Stick
Cheers!
--Sebastian
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
Yes it has jabber.sugarlabs.org in Control Panel / Network
It looks very much like this, which seems to be pretty much a blocker,
yup: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585413
Tom Gilliard
satellit
the people
involved for their awesome work on this release!
Sebastian Dziallas
Sugar on a Stick Project Lead
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:22 PM, samy boutayeb s.bouta...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
I tried to use the Read activity (version 86) in Mirabelle (either
running from within Virtualbox on a USB stick) and got the following
error: Failed to start.
However, the same activity (same version) do launch
We'd like to kick off the process for the upcoming Sugar on a Stick
v.4 already, while gearing up for the SoaS PR at LinuxTag, too. And so
we're looking forward to your ideas and suggestions on the codename
and colour selections for the next release iteration. These will be
discussed at the next
Regards
Harriet
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian, I guess you want to drop the name we had chosen together
previously, Cloudberry? If you remember we
releases and look forward to working with you!
Please email the SoaS list or our release team with any concerns.
--Sebastian Dziallas
[1] http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100607_1510.html
[2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS_Activity_Criteria
[3]
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go
I'm moving this from IAEP to sugar-devel. Aleksey, do you have an idea
what's going on here? I haven't tried GCompris in SoaS lately, but
could this be 0sugar-related?
--Sebastian
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Werner Westermann werne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, regards from Chile.
Working
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote:
I just made a 4 GB USB with persistence from soas-i386-20100623.03.iso
In testing:
Read 86, it still fails to start
log showed unable to find/open evince
[...]
Read does not work because the way it
I've been working on an integration of Smolt
(https://fedorahosted.org/smolt/) into Sugar as part of my GSoC. The
purpose of this is to help us gather information about the hardware
Sugar is running on, as well as to help users filing bug reports to
simplify the process of providing said
Sorry that it took me a bit to reply. Catching up on email backlog
once again. I dropped a couple of replies inline. :)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Sebastian Dziallas's message of Sun Jun 27 21:07:11 +0200 2010:
I've
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 09:37 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió:
Anything else we would like feedback on?
Please also consider http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/503.
I don't know... if we drop the Restart
Here are the minutes (follow the link at the bottom for the logs):
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100719_1506.html
Bernie, what's the state of the VM we had been talking about for Mel
and me (I'd really like to have a real bot there).
Points raised:
* Raffael asked
Hi all,
I'd like us to get a coherent way in terms of user interfaces for
creating Sugar on a Stick on as many distributions as possible. I do
have a first iteration of such a release using Fedora's LiveUSB
Creator ready and need some testers with - preferably different -
distributions. There are
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Reinier,
On 20 Jul 2010, at 00:45, Reinier Heeres wrote:
Hi Gary,
I agree that the AstParser class is a bit scary, but I still believe
it's a good ingredient for Calculate: it allows us to do symbolic
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
we could use some testing.
You can get it from here
The Short Version: As many of you might have noticed, my activities within
Sugar Labs have been fading lately. I'd like to take the only responsible
step and hand my responsibilities off.
The Long Version: I didn't expect to see myself writing this email. I'm
currently a student at Olin working
101 - 157 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
