And remember: Nothing says thank you quite as well as a nice big
donation!
-Original Message-
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2006 10:33 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] kudos to Mr. Ullrich and the rest of the
pfsense
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://patimg1.uspto.gov/.piw?
The
On 4/5/06, Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just upgrade successfully.
remove and re run the traffic wizard.
choose the lan and wan interface.
after wizard finish and done reloading,
i goto traffic shaper menu and it say rule changes and need to reload.
so i click the apply changes button.
I was having issues build embedded image and narrowed down issue to
freesbie
part of build preocess.
I think there was some activity on if_vlan.c, and pfSense's patches are
now removing the last usage of a variable. If you don't remove the
variable declaration too, you get a compiler warning
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL:
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 4/5/06, Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just thought I'd share this. While searching for a patent, I ended up
with an error page that mentioned pfsense:
The requested
Bill Marquette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msntp and openntp size comparison
pfsense
# ls -la `which msntp`
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 455176 Nov 28 16:29 /usr/local/bin/msntp
openbsd
$ ls -la `which ntpd`
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 38784 Feb 14 23:40
patch to our altq-vlan.diff :) If you replaced altq-vlan.diff with
Angelo's that's all that was needed.
--Bill
On 4/5/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the altq-vlan.diff patch, but what is the 2nd patch for?
On 4/5/06, Angelo Turetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was
Yep, already commited. Thanks Angelo!
On 4/5/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patch to our altq-vlan.diff :) If you replaced altq-vlan.diff with
Angelo's that's all that was needed.
--Bill
On 4/5/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the altq-vlan.diff
I think we're somewhat open to this. I personally am partial to
openntp due to it's small size (can't speak much for the FreeBSD port
of it) - with that said, as long as I'm not doing the work, carry on.
We'll import whatever good working solution is decided on.
Joshua, privately I've had
Joshua, privately I've had interest on this from one other person,
hopefully they'll contact you to coordinate efforts
That would be me - I'm no BSD developer, but am certainly willing to
muck about with setting up configs for it and such.
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Randy B wrote:
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's size and
simplicity; I'm not an NTP hero either, but in my short experiments
today, I find it only good enough as far as time quality. You can't
One of the most important things in forensic
On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Sam suggestede adding kern.rdntest.verbose=0 to /etc/sysctl.conf.
I've added it to our file so it should show up on the next snapshot.
It just seems curious to me that the FreeBSD driver for hifn would be
testing randomness of the chip's
BTW: that should have been rndtest instead of rdntest. That'll
teach me to commit stuff without testing ;)
Scott
On 4/5/06, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Sam suggestede adding kern.rdntest.verbose=0 to /etc/sysctl.conf.
I've
Am 05.04.2006 um 22:51 schrieb Vivek Khera:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Randy B wrote:
OpenNTP's only redeeming factors ATM seem to be it's size and
simplicity; I'm not an NTP hero either, but in my short experiments
today, I find it only good enough as far as time quality. You
can't
Only thing I can think of is install from the old media. We started
tracking RELENG_6_0 but I would have thought that it should have been
pretty much in sync with RELENG_6
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BIOS sees the drive properly and the system can boot enough to
Ya that install sees the hdd.. before I proceed though I'd like to track
down whats the issue, any suggestions?
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 18:42 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Only thing I can think of is install from the old media. We started
tracking RELENG_6_0 but I would have thought that it
Not really. It almost sounds like RELENG_6 is not in sync with
RELENG_6_0 but my understanding is that RELENG_6_0 is the FreeBSD 6
release tree so thats what we really need to track.
On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya that install sees the hdd.. before I proceed though
18 matches
Mail list logo
