There is no support for N in pfSense.
Even if you can get you're N-card to work, it will be in G-mode.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Josh Karli [mailto:josh.ka...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 5 mei 2011 22:58
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: [pfSense Support] 802.11n AP success?
On 5/5/2011 5:39 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Josh Karli josh.ka...@gmail.com
mailto:josh.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had any success in setting up a wireless N AP?
According to the 2.0-RC1 record of tests on wireless cards, only
the Marvell 802.11n
There are drivers, they just don't support N. Other functionality works, if
you are lucky.
_
Van: Josh Karli [mailto:josh.ka...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 6 mei 2011 8:43
Aan: support@pfsense.com
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense Support] 802.11n AP success?
On 5/5/2011 5:39 PM,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:21 AM, A Mohan Rao mohanra...@gmail.com wrote:
i have successfully installed pfsense 2.0 on my network and its working
fine, but some times content filter (ACL or GROUP ACL not working).
and i use user based authentication when user click login button its still
stop
Hi,
i used IPCop before i switched to pfsense. in ipcop i had 3 network
interfaces (lan,wan,wlan) which all had different ip (192.168.0. ,
192.168.1. , 192.168.2.). these interfaces where served by the dhcp server.
is this possible to achieve with pfsense 1.x?
the goal is to keep wlan users
Op 6-5-2011 10:57, J. Echter schreef:
Hi,
i used IPCop before i switched to pfsense. in ipcop i had 3 network
interfaces (lan,wan,wlan) which all had different ip (192.168.0. ,
192.168.1. , 192.168.2.). these interfaces where served by the dhcp server.
is this possible to achieve with
Am 06.05.2011 11:23, schrieb Seth Mos:
Op 6-5-2011 10:57, J. Echter schreef:
Hi,
i used IPCop before i switched to pfsense. in ipcop i had 3 network
interfaces (lan,wan,wlan) which all had different ip (192.168.0. ,
192.168.1. , 192.168.2.). these interfaces where served by the dhcp server.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:21 AM, A Mohan Rao mohanra...@gmail.com wrote:
i have successfully installed pfsense 2.0 on my network and its working
fine, but some times content filter (ACL or GROUP ACL not working).
and i use user based authentication when user click login button its still
stop
On 5/6/2011 2:42 AM, Josh Karli wrote:
On 5/5/2011 5:39 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Josh Karli josh.ka...@gmail.com
mailto:josh.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had any success in setting up a wireless N AP?
According to the 2.0-RC1 record of tests on
Hi Frank,
On Thu, 05 May 2011 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Frank Heydlauf wrote:
My console speed changes during the boot from 9600 to 38400
(alix.2d13 board). Maybe same problem in your case.
thanks for the hint. Unfortunately it doesn't help. I already tried
some usual speeds (among them 38400), but
Hello,
I would like to know if there is anyone on this list with a Comcast
cable internet subscription that has already had his/her connection IPv6
enabled.
Kind regards,
Seth
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 08:26, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Is there a simple way to block access to a windows machine? I'm setting
up a network in a remote, far away location and will have little
physical control. I want to control/stop people from sticking a wifi
router and
Jim,
thank you very much for your reply.
On Fri, 06 May 2011 at 08:43:33AM +1200, Jim Cheetham wrote:
However that doesn't sound quite like the original report, especially as
his Firebox worked on 1.2.3. Markus, what output do you get?
See below.
In between and according to some docus I
I signed up for the IPv6 trial and was accepted. I then signed into the
Comcast trial website but am really at a loss whether it is available to me
or not. I'm willing to help test things if I can be of any help.
--
Oliver Hansen
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com wrote:
I signed up for the IPv6 trial and was accepted. I then signed into the
Comcast trial website but am really at a loss whether it is available to me
or not. I'm willing to help test things if I can be of any help.
The
On 5/4/2011 11:37 AM, Vaughn L. Reid III wrote:
On 5/4/2011 11:18 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Vaughn L. Reid III
vaughn_reid_...@elitemail.org wrote:
On 4/29/2011 4:49 PM, bsd wrote:
Le 29 avr. 2011 à 19:08, bsd a écrit :
Le 29 avr. 2011 à 09:37, bsd a écrit
Hi,
Op 6 mei 2011, om 17:06 heeft Oliver Hansen het volgende geschreven:
I signed up for the IPv6 trial and was accepted. I then signed into the
Comcast trial website but am really at a loss whether it is available to me
or not. I'm willing to help test things if I can be of any help.
I've
In addition to this, and to controlling DHCP, as another poster mentioned,
there is an audit method that may take some time, but can be automated to some
degree.
It's an interesting use of TTLs I saw discussed on another list - you have to
keep track of the TTLs by the hosts on your network
In addition to this, and to controlling DHCP, as another poster mentioned,
there is an audit method that may take some time, but can be automated to some
degree.
It's an interesting use of TTLs I saw discussed on another list - you have to
keep track of the TTLs by the hosts on your network
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Oliver Hansen oliver.han...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds doubtful that I do have an IPv6 enabled connection but I do have a
DOCSIS 3 modem and have synced with the 2.0RC1 IPv6 branch at home. I won't
have time to check it out this weekend but at least I can attempt
20 matches
Mail list logo
