On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:15:31 -0500, Ryan Rodrigue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sorry to butt in to this question, but i think it kinda goes along. Has
anybody tried the new Inet atom based processors for something like this?
They have made a few ITX boards for a pretty cheap price. They even have
Simon Dick wrote:
I have an Atom 230 based system I've just put together, unfortunately
it's not one I'm planning to install BSD nevermind pfSense on, I'll
actually be using it for VMWare (one of the guests will be pfSense, but
this is only for a small home network, I'm trying to combine old low
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:55:51 +0100, Paul Mansfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Simon Dick wrote:
I have an Atom 230 based system I've just put together, unfortunately
it's not one I'm planning to install BSD nevermind pfSense on, I'll
actually be using it for VMWare (one of the guests will be
I have a board on order and will let you know how well it works with
pfsense.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:02 AM
To: support@pfsense.com; support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup
On Fri
] Review New Hardware Setup
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:55:51 +0100, Paul Mansfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Simon Dick wrote:
I have an Atom 230 based system I've just put together, unfortunately
it's not one I'm planning to install BSD nevermind pfSense on, I'll
actually be using
Are main CPU hog is the Captive Portal, with 50-100+ people trying to
login at the same time, it can eat up the CPU big time. If i turn
captiveportal off, are 5501s barely peak over 30% cpu, with it on, I'm
seeing 100% spikes all the time.
I can't see me ever having a pipe bigger then 50mb/s
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are main CPU hog is the Captive Portal, with 50-100+ people trying to login
at the same time, it can eat up the CPU big time. If i turn captiveportal
off, are 5501s barely peak over 30% cpu, with it on, I'm seeing 100%
Sorry to butt in to this question, but i think it kinda goes along. Has
anybody tried the new Inet atom based processors for something like this?
They have made a few ITX boards for a pretty cheap price. They even have
intel chipsets.
I would try one of these. http://www.ironsystems.com/items.asp?Cc=ACLASS
1U's are nice.
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Paul Mansfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from a previous discussion, Opteron processors are best.
Not necessarily at this time. The biggest factor in pps throughput is
L1 cache size. AMD procs used to have significantly more L1 cache than
Intels and hence were
10 matches
Mail list logo
