Scott Ullrich wrote:
mkdir /current cvsup current-supfile should get that fixed.
Thanks! That fixed it.
but why use /current/src and /usr/src ? The cvsup_current already does a
cvsup ./stable-supfile. Do you want to get some specific version of patches ?
raj
I have a network with three internal sub-nets and a pfsense gateway. I have
added the require routes and NAT entries to allow the sub nets to see the
internet. However now I can not port forward to our internal mail server
from the external LAN (Using the port forward tab under NAT tick yes to
You can port forward back through a NAT setup
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikelcat=10id=53artlang=en
You can 1:1 map DMZ machine addresses to virtual addresses on the WAN
(see same area of the control panel)
IF DMZ has no NAT you can just add a rule to the WAN tab of the rules
On 3/15/06, Simon O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And in what cases should each of these virtual IP's be used?
CARP would typically be used for a high availability setup. This
would be when you either have (or plan to have) two firewalls in a
redundant setup and a virtual address floating
The file explains why we use current
On 3/16/06, Rajkumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
mkdir /current cvsup current-supfile should get that fixed.
Thanks! That fixed it.
but why use /current/src and /usr/src ? The cvsup_current already does a
cvsup
As you have these cards available, can you test vpn throughput? I would be
interested especially in results for the wrap.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:56 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support]
Maybe the new card is overpowering the power supply. I have lockups
as well when I use certain 12v power supplies on my Soekris units...
On 3/16/06, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still observing lockups which appears to happen more often during
times when I'm connected to the VPN
I remember reading another post in a moonwall thread that someone had
the same issues.
John
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:56 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] lockups continue
I'm still observing
On 3/16/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the new card is overpowering the power supply. I have lockups
as well when I use certain 12v power supplies on my Soekris units...
He stated this was on a server, not a WRAP/Soekris. :) But I can
second the sentiment on the Soekris
Hi,
I try to use the outgoing load balancing with this method
http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=OutgoingLoadBalancingshow_comments=
1
But in all case my connection crashed.
Can you help me?
Regards,
-
To unsubscribe,
I don't have a soekris card but I have the brand 'Dell' in common, maybe
your problems are similar to mine
I have two new Dell PE 850's, which I can make crash very easily by stuffing
around changing IP addresses on interfaces etc. The most common problem
seems to be when I set an interface
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 12:49 +, Robert Mortimer wrote:
You can port forward back through a NAT setup
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikelcat=10id=53artlang=en
You can 1:1 map DMZ machine addresses to virtual addresses on the WAN
(see same area of the control panel)
IF
Creata a rule at your DMZ subnet to allow traffic to destination IP INT MTA at
destination port 25. Make sure that rule is above your block rules. It's
routing between DMZ and LAN by default. Then just send over the Mail to the LAN
MTA by using the internal LAN IP 172.16.130.4.
Holger
Please try to set this from a shell on any pfSense installations and try again:
sysctl net.inet.tcp.blackhole=0
sysctl net.inet.udp.blackhole=0
Scott
On 3/10/06, Lawrence Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 March
14 matches
Mail list logo
