Eugen Leitl schreef:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:16:51PM +1100, Morgan Reed wrote:
I remember reading that a 2.0 RC was planned for end 2009. Not sure
what the current plans are, judging from 1.2RC3 I have the impression
the schedule has slipped a bit. (No criticism implied whatsoever, I'm
Nenhum_de_Nos schreef:
On Mon, October 19, 2009 11:12, Seth Mos wrote:
I have a machine I run at home for DSL, and can help testing 2.0. Is there
any way to upgrade from 1.2.3RC1 and not loose all my data ? (I mean, the
traffic info, rules, package data).
Upgrades should work for the better
bsd schreef:
Hello,
We have been provided with an embedded appliance that includes the
latest EP80579 (Tolapai) and the default tests we have made showed that
the processor is not recognized yet by default kernel. Do you know if
there is any plan to add this proc to the list of supported HW
ozan ucar schreef:
Hello All,
I install pfsense 1.2.2 and full update on IBM x3100 server.
I use 3 day and 4 and 5 success rebooting, dont problem.
Try to configure the bios to set the disk mode from ahci to
compatible or IDE.
Regards,
Seth
Chris Flugstad schreef:
I cant reach an endpoint from 1 location, but can reach it from
somewhere farther up the stream. It's not dying on my end. The admin for
the other end is scratching his head.
So. anyone ever setup a relay or a way to bounce specific traffic(only
traffic going to this
Tim Nelson schreef:
Greetings all-
I apologize if this problem has been fixed in a later version and I've not seen
it yet...
I have a box running pfSense 1.2.2 (Full version) and whenever a DHCP leases is handed
out, there is a 50/50 chance it will actually show up in the Statis--DHCP Leases
tort...@paradise.net.nz schreef:
Hi
Can multiple file names be specified for diskless boot on LAN
functionality in pfSense on the same LAN? (e.g. thin clients and fat
clients from same or different servers on same LAN)
No, this is not possible.
Regards,
Seth
Tortise schreef:
- Original Message - From: Seth Mos seth@xs4all.nl
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:08 PM
Mmm well one can still do it one per LAN. I wonder if using VLANs might
give more scope?
Yes, when you create vlans in pfSense they become
Koray AGAYA schreef:
I Use Pfsense 1.2.2 and Error is below Can you help me please !
Oct 28 09:55:28 racoon: WARNING: /var/etc/racoon.conf:3: 0660
admin port support not compiled in
I don't believe this is 1.2.2-RELEASE, it does not have admin support
compiled into racoon, neither
Lenny schreef:
But I would really like to ask again, as this is very important: will
replacing the PCI-X NIC with PCI-e one give some boost in performance?
Unlikely, there is little reason to switch. The theoretical bandwidth
cases are not too helpful.
The intel dual port pci-e cards are
Nathan Eisenberg schreef:
Any easy way of telling how many DHCP leases are used/remaining in the pool?
Depends on the situation, if on a carp setup with failover it is pretty
hard to do.
On a single install the diag dhcp leases page is your best indication.
If you set a range from 50-100,
No you should not worry with your level of traffic. But as soon as you
cross 500Mb/s you should not trust RRD any more.
I was gradually increasing bandwidh usage using iperf udp -b option:
300Mb/s - ok, 400Mb/s - ok, 500Mb/s - ok, 600Mb/s - ooops -(
In pfSense 2.0 we use the 64 bit counters
darkf...@comcast.net schreef:
Going to the RRD Graphs page will lock up the pfSense box (rare), or
will cause it to reboot (typical).
Sounds like you have a faulty cpu cooler or a bad stick of ram.
for the last 6 months and 18 months. So perhaps during a power failure
These are the
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
Dear All,
kernel: arp: 19.19.19.19 is on le2 but got reply from 00:01:02:03:04:05
on le1
You have a system moving from one interface to another. That or you have
a cable loop.
Also possible is that somebody created a network bridge under windows XP
between 2
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
suppress ARP messages when interfaces share the same physical network
That surpresses the arp messages, just like it should.
Will this mean that packets now get routed, or will they still get
dropped?
Dropped.
Hi,
You mean the one they had on the front of the watchguard firebox 2 and 3 models?
They replicated those in the wsm ui.
In the Firebox X series they have a sort of star interpretation instead of the
triangle.
You could flip the role of the primary lan and wan interface on that one to
show a
Hi,
The quick and dirty answer is don't do it. It won't work.
Why are you using the same /16 on both ends? You'll need to break it up into
smaller parts, it will require renumbering any one of them. If you do it in a
smart way you can still use a summary to refer to all your network.
John Mitchell schreef:
No worries, thanks for your help,
I don't suppose there is any way to backup the RRD Graph data is there?
(More specifiically the Traffic portion). Trying to get a years worth of
data going ;)
Copy off the contents of /var/db/rrd
Regards,
Seth
Many many thanks
Chris Buechler schreef:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:31:38AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I just did the upgrade via the web GUI..
it went down w/o a hitch...
Same thing here. One thing that was a potential problem
in the past
I might be missing the boat here, but what about using a 2.5 SSD
instead of flash + normal HD? That way you get the benefit of solid
state, plus you have the space performance for a regular file system
so you can run all the packages you want. Granted, SSDs aren't the
cheapest things around,
apt@gmail.com schreef:
SSD woul definitely bring the power, speed sound benefits of flash. It only
lacks the perfect recovery of a read-only root fs. A big improvement over spinning
media nevertheless.
The writes should be fine really, worst case is that it will fail to
write at some
2.I connected the static IP to the ETH1 of the soekris and set it in
the WAN interface,and it is working fine,but now I need to set a failover,
let the pfsense prefers WAN2 when WAN fails.
3.I have set the PPPoe in the router,and it works,I connected the router
the ETH2 interface in the
charlyc...@yahoo.com.ar schreef:
Hi,
I have this configuration:
WAN --- 1.2.3.0/26 || --- DMZ 192.168.1.0/24
| pfsense V1.2.2 |
WAN2 --- 3.2.1.0/25 || --- LAN 10.1.1.0/24
I have to be able to connect from the LAN to the DMZ through the
Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 14/12/09 23:47, Jeppe Øland wrote:
As for the PCIe wireless card: it's a MSI brand card, using a Ralink NIC.
(MS-6894, Ralink chip: RTL8187SE)
I guess thats a RealTek wireless card ... probably next to useless for
pfSense or?
realtek != ralink
I've previously have
Op 15 dec 2009, om 22:03 heeft li...@mgreg.com het volgende geschreven:
Got a small issue here. Basically, I replaced a DLINK router with a base
pfSense setup. Now, although all of my machines can ping one another, they
don't seem to be auto-sensing one another -- no machines show up in
Cool! I caught the last 30 minutes. Thanks for the mention.
is there how to download the whole video ? I searched the site but no luck for
me ...
It is Episode 101 for Floss Weekly and will be available on Christmass Eve.
http://www.twit.tv/FLOSS
Regards,
Seth
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according to the guide
Pfsense MultiWAN Howto,
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/pfsense/tutorials/policybased_multiwan/
policybased_multiwan.pdf
I just looked at it. It's entirely correct.
If I am adding rules, and I
Op 17-12-2009 11:35, Paul Mansfield schreef:
has anyone upgraded a pfsense cluster running 1.2.2-release to 1.2.3?
Yes.
am using many CARP addresses on WAN and LAN ports, IPSEC, OpenVPN, and
advanced outbound nat.
I am using multiple WAN connections, 380 IPsec vpn tunnels, roughly a
Op 19 dec 2009, om 22:34 heeft Glenn Kelley het volgende geschreven:
is there a simple way to add an ISCSI or NAS storage to this system?
For systems with limited storage - I do not see a way of doing this out of
the box
I am missing the context here, why would you need it?
Regards,
Op 23-12-2009 8:19, Koray AGAYA schreef:
I use dashboard Have a error WAN Interfaces Statistics. I analysed
system log but I dont view anything What is the problem Where can I
learn What is Problem Where can I look ?
This refers to physical interface errors. Collisions on a duplex
mismatch,
Op 23-12-2009 14:20, Atkins, Dwane P schreef:
Is there a way to preload an upgrade on a device and then have it do
it’s install and reboot later? In other words, can I copy the new
release to a particular directory on a pfSense device and then ssh and
execute script and then have it reboot with
Op 28-12-2009 16:18, Ugo Bellavance schreef:
On 2009-12-28 04:18, Michel Servaes wrote:
My big question - how would I tell which network interface will be the
LAN, to run the WebGUI wizard on... (on an Alix, it's the first one -
but how can I tell on this P3-600 (old compaq) board, which
Op 29 dec 2009, om 20:05 heeft Mark Street het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
I ran nmap from remote servers and sure enough port 25 is not accessible. I
set rules on the WAN to allow SMTP to pass through to the external address on
OPT1 and still no pass. Running netstat on the mail host
get confused and traffic will be dropped because it is not
hitting the states.
That's normally more of a issue on normal routed and NAT configs though.
I recommend a dose of Chris.
Cheers,
Seth
Thanks,
- Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Seth
Op 5 jan 2010, om 17:02 heeft David Newman het volgende geschreven:
For pfSense, I *think* I want the 512-Mbyte embedded image, but am
unsure about what changes, if any, the installation requires. (The docs
for installing/upgrading the embedded images seem oriented toward CF
cards and I
Op 8-1-2010 18:21, Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 08/01/10 16:21, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Paul Mansfieldit-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
if you put multiple lines of configuration in an openvpn server
config,
all the end of lines are lost and the whole lot is run together on
one
line when you
Hi Vinod,
If you are familiar with a unix based system, be that linux or something else,
you should have no issue getting around to develop.
The methods differ wildly though. I personally develop pretty much all of my
code on the test box I have myself. I then create patches from that and
Op 12-2-2010 6:47, David Burgess schreef:
What would it take to get counters on the interface page to not roll
over at 4GB? Is that something that will just happen when PFS moves to
a 64-bit platform? If so, is that a change that will happen with 2.0?
We use 64 bit counters in 2.0 for the
Op 12-2-2010 11:05, Varga Levente schreef:
Hello!
How usable is the 2.0 beta version? I'm asking because I'm using 1.2.3
at the moment but there are a few things that are included (like XAuth
for VPN) in the 2.0 version which I would love to use.
It's pretty usable, just don't attempt to use
Op 17-2-2010 12:56, Hans Maes schreef:
Hello,
I remember reading about this somewhere but can't seem to find it
anymore through google or the forum.
There have been quite a number of posts on the forum with regards to
this. And I've seen a few on the list as well.
see the files in
Op 17-2-2010 13:47, Hans Maes schreef:
Seth Mos wrote:
Which is why I was wondering wheter copying over the entire /var
directory would break things.
Just don't copy the var/run etc, just the things you want.
Tar is your friend here.
Regards,
Seth
Op 24-2-2010 10:48, Abdulrehman schreef:
I have pfsense 1.2.2 with squid in transparent proxy mode. I have
blocked facebook with squid ACLs. But facebook is accessible with https.
I checked the logs and found that only port 80 is being redirected to my
squid port which is 3128. Please tell me
Op 17-3-2010 13:02, Chris Bagnall schreef:
Greetings list,
One of our clients has a requirement for a low-cost ADSL modem/router that'll
act as a VPN endpoint (IPSec or OpenVPN) to a central pfSense node (at their
head office).
Ordinarily I'd just recommend small pfSense nodes like the ALIX
Op 17-3-2010 13:34, Jim Pingle schreef:
On 3/17/2010 8:02 AM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Greetings list,
I have heard there are also some ADSL modem/routers that ATT is
distributing to its business customers which can do IPsec, probably
something from Efficient/Siemens or 2Wire.
I've looked at a
Op 26-3-2010 14:29, Philippe Lang schreef:
Hi,
I'm trying to install a Crystalfontz CFA-635 USB LCD, but apparently, I'm doing
something wrong.
I'm using pfSense 1.2.3, and lcdproc package v.0.5.2.
When plugging the lcd to the USB port 5 (internal port), lcd is well recognized:
Kernel:
The cpu will automatically throttle when the cooler fails to prevent a
burnout.
You should also see a message when it does.
Regards,
Seth
Op 1-4-2010 18:38, J.D. Bronson schreef:
I have noticed when I boot up pfsense 1.2.3, I see stuff
like this on dmesg:
kernel: acpi_throttle0: ACPI CPU
Op 12-4-2010 17:56, Charles Goldsmith schreef:
The computer its running on is about 2 years old, a Cyrix 1ghz with
Oh noes, a Cyrix. I thought they all died in 1997.
I've seen no end of problems with those with either windows or linux.
But then again, intel chips and cheap SiS chipsets were
Op 12-5-2010 3:13, Chris Flugstad schreef:
Cool.
I didnt think anything special would have to be done. Its prolly a
personal problem that the client isn't hookin up with there freinds on
xbox live. i havent a clue. never had a problem like this before
Like Chris said, you should have a rule
Op 10-6-2010 3:26, David Burgess schreef:
Hardware is a Soekris net5501 bios 1.33c with a Lexar 2G CF and no
added hardware. I suppose the issue is more software than hardware
related though, since the boot loader is found and a reboot functions
as expected.
Intruiging, I have a Soekris
Op 10-6-2010 9:29, David Burgess schreef:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Seth Mosseth@dds.nl wrote:
I just got mine back from a 7/8 repair, so I'm going to assume they
did their job and that's not my issue at this point. What I was seeing
before the repair was the disk light coming on
Hi,
Op 18 jul 2010, om 09:14 heeft David Burgess het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:06 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
July 23: Same thing, package will neither function nor delete. I see
this at the bottom of the page when trying to remove the package, even
Op 19-7-2010 7:34, David Burgess schreef:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Seth Mosseth@dds.nl wrote:
So at first glance the RRD Summary could be reconcilable with my ISP's
figures, while the RRD Graph numbers cannot be.
Intruiging, I'll have to look into it.
Interesting that RRD
Op 19-7-2010 8:42, David Burgess schreef:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Seth Mosseth@dds.nl wrote:
Except the monthly graph shows a gap from the previous week when
looking at the current month. Screenshot in the forum:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26789.0.html
No
no, if it finds any it will stop.
Regards,
Seth
Op 25 jul 2010, om 03:01 heeft support-pfsense het volgende geschreven:
Hi all
when i follow the document
http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso
install freebsd 8.1 , update source, etc
then run
#./set_version.sh
Hi,
Op 3-8-2010 20:16, Nenhum_de_Nos schreef:
hail,
all tests now are on BETA4. anyone has any clue ?
this is a via mini itx crusoe based mobo.
Have you considered a bios update?
Regards,
Seth
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
Op 4-8-2010 17:40, Curtis Maurand schreef:
On 8/3/2010 11:15 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
You could probably mitigate some of the writes to disk by having the
logging sent to a syslog server elsewhere inside the house that is using
traditional write media. That should lengthen the life of the
Hello,
Just inquiring here, does anybody already know of a SSL vpn client that
works on the Apple iPad devices?
Viscosity on the Mac works great, but that doesn't apply to iOS.
I see mentions of a Cisco and Juniper client, but no idea if these can
be made to work with pfSense.
Regards,
Hi,
I still need to write some curl code to monitor my own pfSense 2.0 systems at
work.
Hopefully I'll get round to that tomorrow and i'll post some PHP curl code to
do so.
Regards,
Seth
Op 10 aug 2010, om 17:42 heeft Chris Buechler het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:59
Op 11-8-2010 6:12, Chris Buechler schreef:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Chris TheEndch...@theendrecords.com wrote:
Hi,
You can try different settings on the card, like if you're using
channel 'auto', try picking a specific channel and see if it persists.
Also may want to try 2.0 as it
Op 11-8-2010 7:09, Chris Buechler schreef:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Fabricio Ferreiragu...@bol.com.br wrote:
Thanks Everyone!
Actually I made it work, but not using the same monitoring address on both
interfaces.
Yeah you can't do that, as the monitor IP always is forced out only
Op 11-8-2010 9:17, Fuchs, Martin schreef:
Hi !
I have 3 ipsec tunnels.
One of these endpoints has bad wan-connectivity, so it connects some
times day.
This problem exists since a week.
I had to restart my raccoon-service on the central firewall every day,
because it is stopped there ?
I
Hi,
Do you have a firewall rule that allows traffic on the IPsec interface under
firewall rules?
Regards,
Seth
Op 12 aug 2010, om 20:17 heeft Austin G. Smith het volgende geschreven:
I just performed an update on a 1.2.0-RELEASE-FULL firewall last night.
Today we started having
Hi,
Op 23 aug 2010, om 21:08 heeft Jim Cheetham het volgende geschreven:
Perhaps there's another way; what are you doing this for? Instead of
basing rules on a large set of aliases that you have to update
regularly, is there some other characteristic you can group your rules
by? (AKA
Hi,
Op 1-9-2010 17:00, Michael Riglin schreef:
have enough CPU power to support 100 Mbps and above. (Quality and
future-proofing is more important than cost.)
Well, if you search the forum for the Lanner FW7535 you should be able
to find the benchmarks. This firewall platform is sold with
Hi,
Op 7 sep 2010, om 21:24 heeft bsd het volgende geschreven:
Results are somewhat similar…
My main question is why when filtering is enabled do we loose 75% of the
throughput…
When i benchmarked the atom D510 I got in the office last week with 6 intel
nics I had 480mbit throughput
FYI, in pfSense 2.0 we stopped doing that and became a bit smarter about it.
But hey, it was a version 1 product.
Regards,
Seth
Op 18 sep 2010, om 17:21 heeft Nathan Eisenberg het volgende geschreven:
The interface rebuilds was an absolute killer for me. I've had to move our
shared
Op 20-9-2010 1:16, Dave Warren schreef:
In message
aanlktimhp=h08xsyt=bvkel4vhi_u2zroxp9xjxnm...@mail.gmail.com Chris
Buechlercbuech...@gmail.com was claimed
to have wrote:
Firewall Aliases. You should really get a copy of the book. :)
http://pfsense.org/book
Kindle?
I like my dead tree
Op 5-10-2010 20:58, Anil Garg schreef:
At my work, I have to enter: proxy.sucks.com:80 under the
ToolsOptionsnetworkconnectionssettings
I would suggest setting up a proxy wpad host at work that provides the
clients with that information.
Setup a wpad.sucks.com website that has a wpad.dat
I'll have 2 firewalls, and 2 UPS's one for each firewall.
As suggested before, cross the power supply cords between the 2 ups's.
If you have the option of 2 power feeds in your DC then put each UPS on
one specific.
Alternatively there are great breaker strips that take 2 feeds and can
Hi again,
Op 11 okt 2010, om 20:23 heeft Andy Graybeal het volgende geschreven:
Andrew,
From reading the PFSense book, I have now gathered that, like you just said,
having two ADSL providers is not a good way to go about redundancy. In my
case, one ADSL connection is free.. and I'm
Hi,
Op 11 okt 2010, om 21:22 heeft Jim Cheetham het volgende geschreven:
You'd be better off explicitly floating the idea of an RD test rig,
where you can play with things in order to prove which will be best for
production later ...
-jim
On that point, I rebuilt and duplicated my
Hi,
Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs you
need, that's a good solution. Or you can look at the jailctl package and
run a full jail for spamassassin and whatever else you want to throw on it.
This is in production at one site atleast, a all in one wonder with
Op 13-10-2010 23:55, James Bensley schreef:
Thank you too all for your input.
I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be
nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I
like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my
findings ;)
Hi,
Op 16 okt 2010, om 03:49 heeft Mehma Sarja het volgende geschreven:
This is getting interesting, someone on the list mentions that 2.5 drives
are not reliable for 24x7x365 situations - so are you using a 3.5 drive? My
setup is at home as well and it is just not fan noise - we see MUCH
Op 21-10-2010 15:20, James Bensley schreef:
Hello All :D
You are looking for aliases.
Seth
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial
Hi,
Op 21 okt 2010, om 20:06 heeft Christian Borchert het volgende geschreven:
I have a Dell Optiplex 745 SFF (Core 2 Duo) with an Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual
Port Server Adapter
What might be happening here is the somewhat peculiar setup of the pci slot(s)
on the Dell optiplex machines.
For
Hello,
I've been working on IPv6 support for pfSense over the past week and have some
questions on the importance off certain bits. Ofcourse I can't do everything at
once but I can certainly work in some order.
What I have now does:
native ipv6 static on wan and lan.
Route announcement on LAN
Op 31 okt 2010, om 21:16 heeft Nathan Eisenberg het volgende geschreven:
That's all I need - interface addresses and firewall rules! Thank you! Thank
you! Thank you! Come to Seattle, and I will buy you a beer!
When can I have it? :D
Right now, gitsync against my git repo and it should
Op 31 okt 2010, om 21:16 heeft Nathan Eisenberg het volgende geschreven:
That's all I need - interface addresses and firewall rules! Thank you! Thank
you! Thank you! Come to Seattle, and I will buy you a beer!
When can I have it? :D
Right now, gitsync against my git repo and it should
Oops, forgot. It's the thread, not the exact post. But that should get you
started.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26469.0.html
Regards,
Seth
Op 31 okt 2010, om 21:41 heeft Nathan Eisenberg het volgende geschreven:
The entire instruction for getting my code are in the forum post,
Hi Ryan,
Sorry, no, that is currently not possible. I doubt there is much demand for
this feature.
Regards,
Seth
Op 5 nov 2010, om 22:31 heeft Ryan Rodrigue het volgende geschreven:
From: Ryan L. Rodrigue [mailto:radiote...@aaremail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:16 AM
To:
Op 10-11-2010 10:39, bsd schreef:
Hello,
I am reselling hardwawre on my website http://www.osnet.eu/
One of my client has requested to have the ability to use the LCD display for
this device.
Hardware manufacturer has provided me an application in C which allows
communication with the LCD
Hi,
As we use an Alix 2d3 board with 3 ethernet interfaces, there is one
free at now : could we use this OPT interface to manage backbone
network, with an address in its subnet 192.168.1.0/24, and put an
address from 192.168.2.0/24 subnet on the LAN interface to serve
clients, provided these
Op 22-11-2010 9:03, Jeppe Øland schreef:
$ ls -l /var/db/rrd/
total 5000
-rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 47608 Nov 22 00:01 WAN-quality.rrd
-rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 194776 Nov 22 00:01 ipsec-packets.rrd
-rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 194776 Nov 22 00:01 ipsec-traffic.rrd
-rw-r--r-- 1 nobody
Op 22-11-2010 10:43, bsd schreef:
Hello Gavin,
From my point of view (and as far as I am informed) you will have to build
your own LCD driver.
As a reseller of this hardware, I was in touch with the manufacturer, and I
think you will have to use the provided C program and example (provided
Op 29-11-2010 10:51, James Bensley schreef:
I think it would be an useful feature to have; if you have a pfsense box
at the end of a leased line, private virtual circuit or vpn, it would be
good to check the device at the other has x MAC address to try and rule
out any security features like a
There are pictures and a thread of mine on the forum for the dual core 7535
unit with 6 ge ports. It's currently in production to full satisfaction.
Regards,
Seth
Op 17 dec 2010, om 04:26 heeft Kevin Tollison het volgende geschreven:
I had a quote for the 7535 a few months ago. $459 IIRC
There is a post in the forum, to my git branch and instructions for support on
2.0 BETA
http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/ipv6/
I'm currently using it in production on a carp cluster and appears to work fine
for basic firewalling.
Regards,
Seth
Op 20 dec 2010, om 20:19 heeft Bart Grefte het
Op 21-12-2010 1:52, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
after that, it asks if I want to sync with master which doesn’t do
anything.
It says press enter if done. Press enter. ;-)
The procedure for entering custom urls is that you enter it the 1st
time, accept and then press enter to signal it to start.
Op 22-12-2010 11:22, Vincent Hoffman schreef:
At work we've a couple of servers running a synced pfsense
cluster with IPsec tunnels to 2 other pfsense firewalls. While I can see
that CARP syncs the configs across within the cluster I cant find
anything that specifically says that if the primary
Op 21-12-2010 22:50, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
?ok. I got past the gitsync by hitting enter and letting it actually
continue.
now after the sync I get the nice error
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_SL in /etc/inc/vslb.inc on line
291
Oops my bad. I merged up with the current 2.0 code
Op 22-12-2010 16:15, Vincent Hoffman schreef:
I'm already using a CARP address as the VPN endpoint. So the failover
will fire up racoon on the backup node, or do i need to have racoon
started on the backup node already and it just wont negotiate until its
master for that CARP interface?
The
Hi Sean,
Op 23-12-2010 14:01, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:
?-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 :
IPv6?
Verified with wireshark that the DHCPv6 requests are going out
Op 24-12-2010 13:03, Eugen Leitl schreef:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:42:34PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
This should be working again now. If it doesn't, let me know. There was
an issue with the update server, but it should be fixed now.
No 2.0 as Xmas present this year?
I've been upgrade
Op 11-1-2011 18:00, Lan Tran schreef:
ello,
I'm running version 2.0-BETA5 (amd64) built on Fri Jan 7 02:54:00 EST
2011 and builtin RRD traffic graphs are blank when pfSense is acting as
a router (Disable all packet filtering option is checked). The graphs
work fine when I run it as firewall.
Hi,
Op 16 jan 2011, om 18:16 heeft Christoph Hanle het volgende geschreven:
On 16.01.2011 17:55 Seth Mos wrote:
I do know that passive FTP on a router without NAT is currently a issue.
Active works.
Regards,
Seth
THX, changing to active ftp did the job, but this wuergaround
Op 18-1-2011 4:32, David Burgess schreef:
Putting encryption and the various pfsense packages aside, can anybody
tell me (based on theory and/or experience) what kind of comparative
routing throughput I could expect to see from say an Athlon X2, Athlon
II X2, Phenom 2, Atom D510, Pentium D,
Op 21-1-2011 13:19, Danny schreef:
Yes.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FasthEthernet 0/0
err, no, there should be route to the public netblock you are using on
the LAN behind pfsense, pointing to the WAN of pfSense which will be in
the Cisco LAN subnet.
Also note that Ciscos have really long arp
Op 24-1-2011 14:39, Shibashish schreef:
Hi,
I have a mail server running on a vip which is natted to a real-lan ip.
I have added the VIP in load-balancer option and added my lan server as
the virtual-server-pool. But now my outgoing traffic is taking the ip of
firewall as the firewall is its
Op 26 jan 2011, om 21:54 heeft Charles N Wyble het volgende geschreven:
Now I want to utilize my /48 and do prefix delegation, multiple vlans
etc. Anyone doing this with pfsense? Also is anyone doing firewalling of
v6 in pfsense? Does the pfsense book cover any of this?
I saw your post on
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
