Re: [pfSense Support] Hardware... (old)

2005-10-29 Thread Chris Buechler
Forrest Aldrich wrote: Oops sorry about that. ;-) I was using Intel 10/100 cards (dual port). I also had Kensingtons. It could also be due to other factors, such as my running FreeBSD's natd. But, I did notice that SMB file browsing was much more fast when I updated to the new machine.

[pfSense Support] Hardware... (old)

2005-10-28 Thread Forrest Aldrich
I have an old Compaq AP200 (500mhz, maybe 512mb RAM). I think this would be sufficient for the firewall. I admit to some ignorance here. In the past, I had this old Dell that was 400mhz. Network throughput was slower (FreeBSD-4.x). When I put it onto a 2.8ghz box, I noticed a huge

Re: [pfSense Support] Hardware... (old)

2005-10-28 Thread Forrest Aldrich
Oops sorry about that. ;-) I was using Intel 10/100 cards (dual port). I also had Kensingtons. It could also be due to other factors, such as my running FreeBSD's natd. But, I did notice that SMB file browsing was much more fast when I updated to the new machine. My net connection is cable

Re: [pfSense Support] Hardware... (old)

2005-10-28 Thread Forrest Aldrich
In fact, I wonder if this old AP200 (Compaq) will boot of a CD!I'll find out tomorrow! ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]