[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:31 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Are we absolutely sure this program works as intended? Personally I
wouldn't trust anything like
enough.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:31 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Are we absolutely sure
PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:31 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Are we absolutely sure this program works as intended? Personally I
wouldn't trust anything like this but smartbits.
Well...
It works
not report this error well enough.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Zaitsev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:31 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote
At 01:31 PM 11/1/2005, you wrote:
Can we please let this thread die already? I'm tired about hearing
of benchmarking the *WRONG* way.
Must. Control. The. Fist. Of. Death.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please describe the hardware your using fully. NICS, etc. This is
not normal behavior.
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:14 +0100, Espen Johansen wrote:
Hi Peter,
I have seen you have done a lot of testing with apache benchmarking.
I find it
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 12:03 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Please describe the hardware your using fully. NICS, etc. This is
not normal behavior.
Sure It is Dell Poweredge 750
512MB RAM, SATA150 disk, Celeron 2.4Ghz
ACPI APIC Table:
is
choking? (send the output.txt file btw)
Are you able to try this test using routing ver bridging?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:09 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On 10
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:26 -0600, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
Benchmarking 111.111.111.158 (be patient) Completed 1 requests -
isn't 10,000 the default limit of the state table? That sure would
explain a lot.
I boosted it to 10 of course
client to have 10K(ish) of open TCP sessions.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:28 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if part of the problem is PF isn't seeing the TCP tear down. It
seems a little odd that the max gets hit and nothing else gets through.
I guess it could be the benchmark isn't shutting down the session right
after its
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:39 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if part of the problem is PF isn't seeing the TCP tear down. It
seems a little odd that the max gets hit and nothing else gets through.
I guess it could be the
Are you viewing the traffic queue status? This would be normal if you are...
Scott
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:39 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 10/31/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if part of the problem
enabled
which seems to show it is not bridging itself at least.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 1:09 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Network Device pooling
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL
apr_poll: The timeout specified has expired (70007)
What is the above from? Your benchmark testing box?
On 10/31/05, Peter Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 15:48 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Are you viewing the traffic queue status? This would be normal if you
Have you seen this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110887
Looks like a apachebench problem to me.
Scott
On 10/31/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we absolutely sure this program works as intended? Personally I
wouldn't trust anything like this but
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 16:31 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Are we absolutely sure this program works as intended? Personally I
wouldn't trust anything like this but smartbits.
Well...
It works if filtering is disabled on pfsese - this is what worries me.
If the program would be broken it
17 matches
Mail list logo
