Re: [Elphel-support] 10393 Imagers Synchronization

2019-05-08 Thread Elphel Support
Mohamed, If you want to stitch images, you definitely want them synchronized (as we do with panoramic cameras). Without the synchronization you may consider them to have random times. And in any case Exif file header contains the precise timestamps, so you may compare/use them. Andrey

Re: [Elphel-support] 10393 Imagers Synchronization

2019-05-08 Thread Mohamed Morsy
If the camera is in motion and we wanted to stitch together the frames from all 4 imagers, would it be better to have them synchronized? If they weren't synchronized would the frames still match perfectly or would the offsets be noticeable? Mohamed From: Elphel

Re: [Elphel-support] 10393 Imagers Synchronization

2019-05-08 Thread Elphel Support
Hello Mohammed, You can save camera settings so they will be precisely synchronized. In "free running" mode each sensor can have different WOI and so different FPS. You may find info on synchronization here: https://wiki.elphel.com/wiki/Trigger_393 The disadvantage of synchronized mode is in

[Elphel-support] 10393 Imagers Synchronization

2019-05-08 Thread Mohamed Morsy
Hello Oleg, I understand that when 4 imagers are connected to the 10393, they are not in sync by default. Do you know how out of sync they are? Also, is the lack of synchronization noticeable? If the cameras are in motion, will there be significant gaps between the different imagers' frames? If