Hi!
Thanks for the response. Does it matter that its 2.6.18-rc4 and not
2.6.18-rc3? I compiled rc3 a while ago and just tried it out and
didn't get a significant improvment. Specifically, suspending to ram
using powersave still takes about 30 seconds to resume and suspending
Hi!
I found out that my X60 was not in the whitelist, because its serial
was not in range. I'll just commit 1709* addition to the whitelist,
but...
Could not we use ThinkPad X60 string to just whitelist all of them? I
see it would not work on older thinkpads, but on x60 we have
meaningful
On Wed 2006-08-09 10:02:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I found out that my X60 was not in the whitelist, because its serial
was not in range. I'll just commit 1709* addition to the whitelist,
but...
Could not we use
Hi,
With the libc6-dev in current debian sid, I need to include linux/fs.h
to compile. Else gcc will complain
swsusp.h:141: error: SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE undeclared
This problem was hidden by the fact that that constant is defined
in swsusp.h if SYS_sync_file_range was not, which wasn't
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 11:30, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
Hi Guys,
Again, thanks for all the input. Stefan my machine is new. I bought it less
than two years ago and it was a very expensive laptop ;- Its a Sony A190
(the ones with the giant screens that are completely unportable) and in
Hi!
My new HP dv8000t will not resume from suspend-to-RAM. It seems to be truly
dead, not just a display issue (though obviously, the display doesn't go on
either). Upon resume(=from RAM), there is no caps lock, and any command
issued blindly does nothing, even after cacheing the command
Hi!
Please no html posts.
I don't really know how powersave is setup but I presume if I just
call s2ram manually from the console that this does not run any
scripts or anything on resume right? But when I try s2ram manually it
still takes ~30 seconds to get me back to X windows.
Hi Rafael,
Should the patch you gave me work against a normal 2.6.18-rc3 tree?
The patch command is telling me it can't find the file to patch at
input line 9 (which does not seem to point to a file). Sorry if I'm
being dense but I don't know the expected syntax of the patch file. I
ran 'patch
Hi
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:50:33 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh... right solution here would be to make them fix their BIOS.
Hmm, I just tried two latest and it says stem manufacturer instead of
System manufacturer, what a great improvement.
Or you could submit a patch to add
Hi!
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh... right solution here would be to make them fix their BIOS.
Hmm, I just tried two latest and it says stem manufacturer instead of
System manufacturer, what a great improvement.
Or you could submit a patch to add required fields to
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The fix was for AMD/NVidia IDE, but Alan vetoed it on the basis that it should
be done at the general level. Everyone agreed, but I don't know if anyone
took care of that. Jason?
I redid the patch at the general IDE level.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
We got the report (twice :-).
The only other notes I have is that:
1) This is a desktop PC (ASUS A7V600, AMD Barton 2800+, ATI X700 Pro
AGP, 2 GB DDR 400)
...but desktop PCs are little trickier to whitelist :-(.
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 01:54:50PM +0200, Martin Sack wrote:
Hello
I'm using s2ram integrated within powersaved on an Acer TravelMate
801LCi which has been recognized as a TravelMate 800. Its graphics
adapter is a Radeon M9 which suffers from the usual radeon chip
problems. To get s2ram
Hi,
I got a bug report in the debian BTS which is beyond my knowledge.
Could one of you shed some light on the issue?
Thanks,
Tim
Forwarded message:
Machine: IBM Thinkpad R50p
I recognized following issues concerning s2ram/s2disk/s2both:
- calling s2ram works fine, resuming from RAM
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I got a bug report in the debian BTS which is beyond my knowledge.
Could one of you shed some light on the issue?
Hopefully.
I ran across exactly the same on a T42p today.
Machine: IBM Thinkpad R50p
I recognized
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:31:59 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, plus huge comment saying what stupid manufacturer did this
:-). Assuming there's only one i***t making notebooks, it will
actually work okay.
I didn't say it's notebook :-). It's desktop computer. And as I can see
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:27:13PM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
suspending so I couldn't test this.
Maybe. Which ide driver are you using? There's plenty of other stuff in
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
With the libc6-dev in current debian sid, I need to include linux/fs.h
to compile. Else gcc will complain
swsusp.h:141: error: SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE undeclared
This problem was hidden by the fact that that constant
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 18:27, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
suspending so I couldn't test this.
There is a general suspend failure related to the block IO in -rc3-mm2.
I'm
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 15:15, Jason Lunz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The fix was for AMD/NVidia IDE, but Alan vetoed it on the basis that it
should
be done at the general level. Everyone agreed, but I don't know if anyone
took care of
On 8/9/06, Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:31:59 +0200
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, plus huge comment saying what stupid manufacturer did this
:-). Assuming there's only one i***t making notebooks, it will
actually work okay.
I didn't say it's
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 17:06, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I got a bug report in the debian BTS which is beyond my knowledge.
Could one of you shed some light on the issue?
Thanks,
Tim
Forwarded message:
Machine: IBM Thinkpad R50p
I recognized following issues concerning
On 8/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After having disabled the so called IBM Predesktop Area in the BIOS
everything works (in the BIOS setup: Security - IBM Predesktop Area -
Current Setting: Disabled).
As far as I know this IBM Predesktop Area is located in a HPA.
Which
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 23:28, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
On 8/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After having disabled the so called IBM Predesktop Area in the BIOS
everything works (in the BIOS setup: Security - IBM Predesktop Area -
Current Setting: Disabled).
As far
Sorry to say that it doesn't seem to help much on my laptop. I
installed 2.6.18-rc3 with your patch (I even checked the code to see
that the patch got implemented) and tried s2ram from the console and
suspend still took noticably long. Moreover, when I got back a prompt
I tried and 'ls' and the
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:54:19AM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
Is this a similar problem to what you were having on your laptop
before the patch? Would you expect your patch to work for me or do
you think its an unrelated problem? Whatever it is I definately have
an issue with the disk
26 matches
Mail list logo
