Re: [Suspend-devel] gericom bellagio not in whitelist

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:50:06AM +0200, Einon wrote: Hi! My machine is not recognised by default, but works fine with s2ram -f, so here is a small report: Gericom Bellagio 1540 misato:~# s2ram Machine is unknown. This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = Gericom

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram report

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 09:18:47PM +0200, Philip Frei wrote: Hi, I've got an Asus S5200N notebook: This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = ASUSTeK Computer Inc. sys_product = S5N sys_version = 1.0 bios_version = 0213 I followed the

Re: [Suspend-devel] Problem with suspend to ram on nforce4

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:38:12AM +0300, sir_j wrote: hi Stefan. I can't configure suspend to ram Here is output of tool s2ram sirj:/home/sir_j# s2ram Machine is unknown. This machine can be identified

Re: [Suspend-devel] Suspend with cryptsetup encrypted swap?

2006-10-30 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:15:15 + (UTC) Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason Lunz scripst: Yes, it works just fine. I've been running a laptop with dm-crypt on swap and root for months now - only /boot is unencrypted. That's cool -- more I am thinking about that more I don't

Re: [Suspend-devel] gericom bellagio not in whitelist

2006-10-30 Thread Einon
Hi! I checked what you asked. Rebooted my notebook in text-only (single) mode, and tried the s2ram with all the parameter variations shown on the documentation page. The result was the same every time: suspended into ram successfully, but when I pressed a key on the keyboad (my bios does not

Re: [Suspend-devel] gericom bellagio not in whitelist

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Einon wrote: Hi! I checked what you asked. Rebooted my notebook in text-only (single) mode, and tried the s2ram with all the parameter variations shown on the documentation page. The result was the same every time: suspended into ram successfully,

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Avoid modifying file access time after creating the image

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:36:46AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:20:50 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately in its current form s2disk causes the access time of the resume device special file to be updated after the suspend image has been

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Avoid modifying file access time after creating the image

2006-10-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 30 October 2006 09:37, Stefan Seyfried wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:20:50AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, Unfortunately in its current form s2disk causes the access time of the resume device special file to be updated after the suspend image has been created,

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Avoid modifying file access time after creating the image

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 30 October 2006 09:37, Stefan Seyfried wrote: On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:20:50AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, Unfortunately in its current form s2disk causes the access time of the resume

Re: [Suspend-devel] Suspend with cryptsetup encrypted swap?

2006-10-30 Thread Matej Cepl
Tim Dijkstra scripst: is something like that possible. Suspend writes to (then encrypted with /dev/urandom key) image of the frozen memory, so how can resume decrypt Random key? Why not for swap? OK, except that suspend cannot work :-). Does it mean that I should switch to inserting password

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] Avoid modifying file access time after creating the image

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:26:55PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Well, but if some data structures are different than the tmpfs driver thinks they are, the kernel could oops/panic at umount, couldn't it? Yes, it could, but they won't be. After a successful resume the tmpfs will be in