Hi.
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 09:10 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:41:52PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:39 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So if somebody submits a patch that implements a reset_signature
program,
i'll include
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:28:08PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Since you mentioned it, what's they point to using these ugly, looong
uuids? /dev/hda2 is so much simpler and easier to read for mere humans.
Try updating a system using, say, the piix driver for the harddisk to the
new libata
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
But this engineer should also know if he depends on the UUID of the swap
partition to find it. If he does not, he can simply do a mkswap to reset
the signature.
Since you mentioned it, what's they point to using these ugly, looong
uuids? /dev/hda2 is so much
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:41:52PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:39 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So if somebody submits a patch that implements a reset_signature program,
i'll include that in the suspend package.
I don't know if you care (you might not
Hi.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:39 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So if somebody submits a patch that implements a reset_signature program,
i'll include that in the suspend package.
I don't know if you care (you might not want to support Suspend2), but
for Suspend2 enabled kernels, you can just
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Ugh, no it's not. You really want the UUID on the swap area to remain
the same.
--
Peter
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Ugh, no it's not. You really want
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 15:00 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
Ugh, no it's not. You really want the UUID on the swap area to remain
the same.
Why?
[not questioning your reasoning, this is coming from someone who knows
very little about swap structure and what the UUID is used for]
Daniel
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, I wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Ugh, no it's not. You really want the UUID on
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:17:47PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, I wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about this text in Documentation/power/swsusp.txt:
* If you touch anything on disk between suspend and resume...
*...kiss your data goodbye.
It's obvious that this is a bad idea but I'm
2006/11/28, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 10:43:51AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about this text in Documentation/power/swsusp.txt:
* If you touch anything on disk between suspend and
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
He just has to look at the end of the first page of the swap partition
for the signature :-)
So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do mkswap on the swap
partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:06:03PM +0100, Emilio Scalise wrote:
In suspend2 (now I will get flamed...) there is a nice feature that
warns that you are trying to resume with a wrong kernel, that lets you
reboot the machine without losing anything
I won't flame you. It just does not help if
14 matches
Mail list logo
