Mike Use the BCC (Blind Carbon Copy) function for all but the first name-D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: MK DuPree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:43:42 -0600
Reply-To:
Mike Use the BCC (Blind Carbon Copy) function for all but the
first name-D
Mailman doesn't like that either: Message has implicit destination
it says, and stops it pending authorisation. But that's okay, just as
long as nobody minds a bit of waiting. With BCC the other recipients
are
http://www.plotkin.com/blog-archives/2007/02/the_strange_cas.html
February 06, 2007
The Strange Case of Dr. Rusi Taleyarkhan
Like many others, I was intrigued when Science magazine published a
controversial paper in 2002 by Dr. Rusi Taleyarkhan, then a scientist at the
Oak Ridge National
Thank you Dawee and Keith...I'm still confused, however. I checked the link on
your first post, Keith, regarding this issue and in the archives only the post
appears. So that's great. As I mentioned in my post to Wendell, I still don't
understand what happened since I didn't use the CC
Hello to All,
Keith's post Virgin, the Dynamo, and the Prize ( 2/19/07) made it
apparent that the idea of carbon sequestration (as CO2) was not going to just
go away.
I seem to have lost touch with the thinking/logic of our times and wonder
if a little kowledge of natural carbon
it inevitably
will increase the emission of carbon dioxide and so hasten the buildup of
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, thus causing irreversible climate change.
This in my opinion is without a doubt the greatest con ever perpetuated on
mankind. I started to write an article called
Hello all
Does anybody know offhand (or even onhand) what changes with ASTM
D6751-7 as opposed to the original D6751? The original is here:
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds
I guess I should update it. I know there have been changes dealing
with calcium and magnesium
Thank you Dawee and Keith...I'm still confused, however. I checked
the link on your first post, Keith, regarding this issue and in the
archives only the post appears. So that's great. As I mentioned in
my post to Wendell, I still don't understand what happened since I
didn't use the CC
Sigh...
Well John, you keep saying this and similar things, and other list
members respond but you ignore them.
But ignoring other list members' responses to your posts is not an option.
It says in the List rules (which you were referred to when you joined):
If someone questions you, don't
I don't think you are going to find much agreement around here. I'd be
willing to bet that a lot of the members of this list might not only
disagree but find your comments somewhat offensive. I know I do.
Joe
John Wilson wrote:
This in my opinion is without a doubt the greatest con ever
John,
I apologize John. In a previous post (Chicken Little Strikes Again!
2/5/07)
you wrote:
Doing an article to rebut this CO2 nonsense. It is so easy to refute. Anyone
ever tell you people who are for this chicken little theory that C02 causes
global warming that heat rises. The co2
Keith quoted a USA Today article:
WASHINGTON - It may be cold comfort during a frigid February, but
last month was by far the hottest January ever for the planet.
Here in New York State (US) we had temps in the 60s (F) and even
reached 73F during Dec and January. I had built a small ice
I think that Bcc is what you want. I've done that where I send an email to
20 or 30 people, and I put them all in the Bcc field so they can't see each
other (plus there isn't a mile long header on it either).
On 2/20/07, Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wendell
Dear M K,
You
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2274486.ece
22 February 2007 04:29
PM's nuclear power consultation was a sham, court rules
By Colin Brown, Deputy Political Editor
Published: 16 February 2007
Tony Blair's plans for a new generation of nuclear power stations
have been thrown
Oil sands emissions could be curbed for $1 a barrel: study
Byline: BY DENNIS BUECKERT
OTTAWA (CP) _ The oil sands could be brought
into compliance with Kyoto emissions-cutting targets
at a cost of about $1 per barrel of oil produced, a
Commons committee was told Tuesday.
The estimate, contained in
Fund new technology to curb climate change: oil executive
New technology, not punitive measures, is the best
way to help oil and gas companies in Canada reduce
pollution, an Alberta oil executive told a special
legislative committee on Tuesday.
Gordon Lambert, vice-president, sustainable
Winnipeg group wins national award for environmentally friendly house
WINNIPEG (CP) _ A Winnipeg group has won a
national award for designing a house that will
generate as much electricity over the course of a year
as it consumes.
T he project was principally designed by a team from
Prairie
Darryl McMahon quoted an article that included:
Fund new technology to curb climate change: oil executive
New technology, not punitive measures, is the best
way to help oil and gas companies in Canada reduce
pollution, an Alberta oil executive told a special
legislative committee on Tuesday.
Besides, the American way of life is a blessed one.
robert and benita rabello wrote:
Darryl McMahon quoted an article that included:
Fund new technology to curb climate change: oil executive
New technology, not punitive measures, is the best
way to help oil and gas companies in Canada
Biodiesel start-up hauls in $214 million
By Caroline McCarthy, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CNET News.com
Published on ZDNet News: http://news.zdnet.com/2001-1_22.html February
21, 2007, 12:30 PM PT
*Seattle-based biodiesel maker Imperium Renewables announced on
Wednesday that its Series B
John,
I apologize John. In a previous post (Chicken Little Strikes Again!
2/5/07)
you wrote:
Doing an article to rebut this CO2 nonsense. It is so easy to refute. Anyone
ever tell you people who are for this chicken little theory that C02 causes
global warming that heat rises. The co2
I don't think you are going to find much agreement around here. I'd be
willing to bet that a lot of the members of this list might not only
disagree but find your comments somewhat offensive. I know I do.
Joe
Sorry if the truth offends Joe! But I don't believe in living a lie!
Yours truly
If you're questioned again this time, don't ignore it.
By the way, I object to the change you made to the title: Re:
[Biofuel] Global Warming: It's All About Energy (Keith Addison).
Didn't make any changes keith Just cut and paste same as I did this time. See i
didn't ignore it!
Yours truly
From: John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Global Warming: It's All About Energy (Keith
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:48:25 -0400
If you're questioned again this time, don't ignore it.
By the way, I object to the change you made to the title: Re:
How much of the biodiesel that Imperium Renewables makes with this
scale of operation will be renewable? Industrial monocrops don't
qualify as renewable, it's not renewable if the production system
isn't sustainable, and theirs isn't. Or even clean-burning - at the
tailpipe maybe, but the
I'd like to see what it looks like. The problem with most of these projects is
that they are in the wrong place, i.e. normal motor-vehicle-based, low-density,
single-land-use, dormitory suburbs. What does 'duplex' mean in Canada? It's one
of those terms that mean different things in different
Why am I getting the impression that Industry is bending over backwards to
discredit the whole biofuel idea by applying it in the worst possible way? Are
they preparing the ground for getting it banned?
It is how they've operated before. Just look at catalytic converters and
platinum
27 matches
Mail list logo
